دانشگاه گیلان دانش شهرسازی 2645-5412 10 1 2026 03 21 Psychological Effectiveness of Biophilic Design in Urban Space: A Systematic Review تبیین اثربخشی روانشناختی طراحی بایوفیلیک در فضای شهری: یک مرور نظام‌مند 74 99 9667 10.22124/upk.2026.31198.2045 FA فاطمه شاهوران پژوهشگر دکتری شهرسازی-طراحی شهری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران 0000-0002-5510-2309 مریم روستا دانشیار طراحی شهری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران حسن ایزدی دانشیار برنامه‌ریزی شهری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران Journal Article 2025 07 15 Introduction: Biophilic design is known as a nature-friendly design philosophy for sustainable development, which, in combination with psychological effects, can lead to the creation of an urban space with desirable environmental quality. Understanding urban environments through everyday experiences with direct or indirect contact with nature allows urban designers and planners to shape design strategies for the sustainability of a biophilic city based on mental health. It seems that this research gap can be somewhat integrated and improved by a systematic review of the literature in this field. The present study aims to review research related to the field of biophilic design literature and mental health and psychological recovery in the specific field of urban design studies based on a systematic review method and descriptive and qualitative content analysis. Methodology: In order to apply the systematic review method using the Prisma checklist, a structured brainstorming search was first conducted by setting the objectives, research questions, and key concepts of the research field. In the first step, the keywords biophilic, biophilic design, mental health, psychology, and urban space (and in some cases, several similar terms such as public space, urban place, and public place) were searched in the field of urban planning and design studies and in the scientific databases "Science Direct", "Taylor & Francis", "Sage", and "MDPI" and using the search engines "Web of Science" and "PubMed" and in the period from 2014 to 2024 (the last decade of the last century), and 548 articles were found. Also, in order to optimize the article search process, the keywords were used experimentally several times in combination with each other. In the second step, with the aim of examining related topics, less relevant or unrelated articles to the field of urban planning and design were eliminated, and 244 studies were selected, which was reduced to 215 by eliminating duplicate articles. In the third step, 145 articles were selected by eliminating duplicate and inaccessible articles in the field of urban design, and 74 articles were selected in the initial screening based on title review and abstract overview. In the final step, relatively relevant items were eliminated, and 36 completely relevant articles were selected by reviewing the structure and content of the other two types. In this step, after a complete and detailed review of the content, non-applicable articles were eliminated, and in the end, 28 articles were selected as selected articles, which were analyzed in descriptive and qualitative fields of content. In relation to the descriptive analysis of content, the time of publication, research journal, geographical origin, type of study scale, and research method and approach were examined. Results: The results show that the importance of this issue has been considered in the last five years, mainly in European and American countries. Qualitative findings also indicate that the selected studies were mainly place-based with a combined quantitative-qualitative approach. These studies focused on ten cognitive categories in the field of the most important concerns related to biophilic design and mental health and psychological recovery. The psychological effectiveness of biophilic design in urban space can also be realized within the framework of six main fields. The emotional-cognitive categories and green natural landscape are the most research focus areas, and the perceptual-cognitive and environmental fields are among the most practical fields in defining the framework of the psychological effectiveness of biophilic design in urban space. Also, in the content structure of these studies, health and biophilic design have the most connection and relationship with the concepts of restoration or recovery, stress, and urban green space. Discussion: Evidence from the qualitative findings shows that; in general, by considering three areas; environmental aspects, human aspects and human-environment interaction aspects, an urban space can be designed that improves the quality of nature and ensures the mental health of citizens. Therefore, it seems that 1- The psychological effectiveness of biophilic design in urban space can be evaluated and designed or redesigned with a framework consisting of perceptual-cognitive, environmental, physical-visual, social, activity-functional and personality study fields. 2- The most important concepts related to the relationship between biophilic design and mental health are known in the emotional-cognitive categories, green natural landscape, environmental perception and cognitive sciences, water-sensitive landscape, livability, welfare and well-being of citizens, human experience, activity diversity, social sustainability and social groups. Meanwhile, the main focus of studies on emotional-cognitive categories and green natural landscapes can indicate that biophilic design as an environmental approach in sustainable development has a close connection with the psychological process of humans as citizens and users of urban space. 3- It seems that from the perspective of the content challenge, by completing the existing literature and the necessity of re-prioritizing the field of environmental sustainability and its related concepts, the application of this approach can be linked to the research field of urban planning and design with an emphasis on more health-orientedness, which will also be the foundation of the executive field. Conclusion: Despite the volume of studies conducted in the field of biophilic design, the findings of the present study can achieve deeper insight into the psychological effectiveness of this type of nature-friendly design. Also, by providing a theoretical foundation for research and studies related to the literature on nature-friendly and health-oriented design, it can be a guide for future research in various fields of thematic literature, methodology, concerns, and challenges, especially in the context of domestic research studies. بیان مسئله: طراحی بایوفیلیک به‌مثابه یک فلسفه طراحی دوستدار طبیعت در جهت توسعه پایدار شناخته می‌شود که در تطبیق با اثرات روانشناسانه می‌‌تواند به خلق فضای شهری با کیفیت محیطی مطلوب منجر شود. شناخت محیط‌های شهری بواسطه تجربیات روزمره با تماس مستقیم یا غیرمستقیم با طبیعت به طراحان و برنامه‌ریزان شهری این امکان را می‌دهد تا راهبردهای طراحی را در جهت پایداری یک شهر بایوفیلیک مبتنی بر سلامت روان شکل دهند. به نظر می‌رسد این شکاف تحقیقاتی با یک مرور نظام‌یافته می‌تواند تا حدودی ادبیات موضوعی این حوزه را منسجم‌ کرده و بهبود بخشد. هدف: پژوهش پیش‌رو با هدف مرور پژوهش‌های مرتبط با حوزه ادبیات طراحی بایوفیلیک و سلامت روان و بازیابی روانشناختی در زمینه خاص مطالعات طراحی شهری مبتنی بر روش مرور سیستماتیک و تحلیل توصیفی و کیفی محتوا انجام شده است. روش: پس از بررسی پژوهش‌ها در پایگاه‌های علمی داده مرتبط با زمینه طراحی شهری و حذف و پایش مقالات طی فرآیندی مبتنی بر چارچوب پریزما، 28 مطالعه انتخاب شده و زمان انتشار، نشریه، خاستگاه پژوهش، نوع مقیاس مطالعاتی، روش و رویکرد پژوهش، تمرکز اهداف مطالعاتی و یافته‌های پژوهشی آن‌ها مورد بررسی و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. یافته‌ها: یافته‌های پژوهش، بیان‌گر آن است که اثربخشی روانشناختی طراحی بایوفیلیک در فضای شهری با چارچوبی متشکل از زمینه‌های مطالعات ادراکی-شناختی، زیست‌محیطی، کالبدی-بصری، اجتماعی، فعالیتی-عملکردی و شخصیتی می‌تواند مورد ارزیابی قرار گیرد. هم‌چنین مهم‌ترین مفاهیم مرتبط با ارتباط میان طراحی بایوفیلیک و سلامت روان در مقولات احساسی-شناختی، منظر طبیعی سبز، ادراک محیطی و علوم شناختی، منظر حساس به آب، زیست‌پذیری، رفاه و بهزیستی شهروندی، تجربه انسانی، تنوع فعالیتی، پایداری اجتماعی و گروه‌های اجتماعی آمده است. نتیجه گیری: طراحی بایوفیلیک، ضمن کاهش مهم‌ترین چالش‌های سلامت روان یعنی استرس، اضطراب و افسردگی، احساس آرامش، شادی و امنیت را به همراه می‌آورد و در سطوح بالاتر ضمن تأثیر بر فرآیند یادگیری، بر افزایش خلاقیت نیز اثرگذار است. یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر می‌تواند بینش و تحلیل عمیق‌تری در حوزه اثربخشی روانشناختی طراحی دوستدار طبیعت به جامعه پژوهشی ارائه دهد. این دستاوردها هم‌چنین می‌تواند راهنمایی برای پژوهش‌های آتی در این زمینه بوده و در تدوین راهبردها و دستورالعمل‌ها در جامعه حرفه‌ای برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی شهری مورد کاربست قرار گیرد.

https://upk.guilan.ac.ir/article_9667_86607263eeb46ea4366fbed20f50634a.pdf