Investigating the Status of Participatory Urban Development Planning and its Challenges in the Institutionalist School of Thought

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: In the context of public policy and planning of recent decades, public participation has been regarded as an absolute goodness or a common belief practice (common critical practice) which is rarely questioned. However, there is little evidence showed the long-term effectiveness of applicability the participatory approaches to improve the physical conditions of the most vulnerable groups or their success in creating social change. Meanwhile, as the related issues of participation concept are highly affected by neo-institutionalism theories, and the participatory processes are formed and regulated by institutional regulations, identifying the barriers and challenges of the participatory planning in different institutional levels and the affected institutional rules of these barriers is necessary to get out of them.
Objectives: Investigating the failure reasons of the participatory approaches to access their primary goals as a problem in the collective action through detecting the causes and  the factors of non-cooperative behaviors in the participatory processes leading to failure, and recommending an institutional framework for the participatory processes to overcome this problem.
Methodology: The present study with an explanatory-exploratory approach in the framework of interrogative research strategy, uses various techniques e.g. systematic content analysis and qualitative deductive text analysis to answer the research questions.
Results: After identifying the main institutional challenges of participation in the theoretical domain, emphasizing the content critiques on the application of participatory approaches, the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD)  framework introduced by Elinor Ostrom is used in this study to identify the seven-fold institutional rules governing participatory processes in the field of urban development planning, and finally, the conceptual model of the "Institutional Analysis Framework for Participatory Urban Development" is elaborated.
Conclusion: The analysis framework introduced in this study would be applicable in future applied research, in three levels namely: operational level, for generating practical outcomes of participatory planning, policymaking level for decision-making and policy making within the constraints and rules of collective choice affecting the structure of participatory planning action situations, and expandable and operational at the legal level for determining the participants for policy making and its determining rules.

Highlights

This research identifies the institutional challenges of the participation context in the theoretical field and emphasizes the content critiques in the application of participatory approaches.

The framework for Institutional Analysis of Participatory Urban Development Planning as the main finding of this study, can be developed and exploited in the future applied research, at three levels, namely operational level to produce practical participatory planning outcomes, policy level for decision-making and policy-making within the framework of limitations and collective choice rules affecting the structure of planning action situations, and the legal level, to determine the composition of the relevant policymakers and the determinant rules in this regard.

Keywords

References

Abdi Daneshpour, Z. (2008). An Introduction to Planning Theories with Special Reference to Urban Planning Theories. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. (in Persian)
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, C. (2013). The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development (M. Naeimipour, Trans.). Political & Economic Ettelaat, 293, 90-109. (Original work published 2010). (in Persian)
Alipour, P., Zahedi, M. J., & Shiani, M. (2009). Trust and Participation: A Study of the Relationship between Trust and Social Participation in Tehran. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 10 (2), 109-135. (in Persian)
Asgari, A. (2012). Institutionalism and Planning. In P. Ejlali, M. Rafieian, & A. Asgari, Planning Theory: Traditional and New Perspectives. Tehran: Agah Publishers. (in Persian)
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Books.
Biggs, S. (1995). Participatory Technology Development: A Critique of the New Orthodoxy. Durban: Olive Information Service (AVOCADO series 06/95).
Blackstock, K. L., Kelly, G. J., & Horsey, B. L. (2007). Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological economics, 60 (4), 726-742.
Blaikie, N. (2013). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation (H. Chavoshian, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (Original work published 2000). (in Persian)
Brett, E. A. (1996). The participatory principle in development projects: the costs and benefits of cooperation. Public Administration & Development (1986-1998), 16 (1), 5-19.
Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22 (7), 953-969.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP).
Cleaver, F. (1999). Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of international development, 11 (4), 597.
Cleaver, F. (2000). Moral ecological rationality: institutions and the management of common property resources. Development and Change, 31 (2), 361-383.
Cleaver, F. (2004). The limits of participation in development. The Sahel, 5, 67.
Cleaver, F. and Kaare, B. (1998). Social embeddedness and project practice: a gendered analysis of promotion and participation in the Hesawa programme. Tanzania: University of Bradford for SIDA, June.
Coenen, F. H. J. M. (Ed.). (2009). Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions: The Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-making. Springer.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? New York & London: Zed Books.
Cornwall, A. (2003). Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World development, 31 (8), 1325-1342.
Creighton, J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement. John Wiley & Sons.
Edrisi, A., & Shojaie, M. (2013). Examination of the factors affecting the inhabitants social participation in urban development projects: A case study of building pedestrian ways in the historical texture of Tehran (Region 12),  Social Development and Welfare Planning,4 (13),115-158.(in Persian)
Eyburn, R., & Ladbury, S. (1995). Popular participation in aid assisted projects: why more in theory than in practice? In N. Nelson, & R. Wright (Eds.), Power and Participatory Development. London: IT Publications, Ch. 17.
Friedmann, J., & Kuester, C. (1994). Planning education for the late twentieth century: an initial inquiry. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14 (1), 55-64.
Givi, M., Alipour, S., Nazari, S., & Eghamati Ghashti, R. (2015). A Study of Factors Affecting Citizens' Participation in Sustainable Urban Development (Case Study: Bandar Abbas). Social Sciences Quarterly, Islamic Azad University, Shushtar Branch, 9 (4), 167-190. (in Persian)
Goebel, A. (1998). Process, perception and power: Notes from ‘participatory’ research in a Zimbabwean resettlement area. Development and Change, 29 (2), 277-305.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis. Acta sociologica, 35 (1), 3-11.
Healey, P. (2007). The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning. In N. Verma, Institutions and Planning. Oxford: Elsevier.
Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jessop, B., Amin, A., & Hausner, J. (1997). Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity. Cheltenham, UK & Lyme, NH: E. Elgar.
Hosseini, S.H., Ghodrati, H., & Javadian, S.H. (2012). An Analysis of Citizens' Participation in Sustainable Urban Development (Case Study: Sabzevar City). Proceedings of the National Conference on Urban Planning and Management, Mashhad. (in Persian)
Huitema, D. (2009). A Comparison of Participatory and Non-participatory Approaches to Hazardous Waste Siting. In F. H. J. M. Coenen (Ed.), Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions: The Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-making. Springer.
Juarez, J. A., & Brown, K. D. (2008). Extracting or empowering? A critique of participatory methods for marginalized populations. Landscape Journal, 27 (2), 190-204.
Jütting, J. (2003). Institutions and development: a critical review (Vol. 11). OECD Publishing.
Klok, P-J., & Denters, B. (2005). Urban leadership and community involvement: An institutional analysis. In M. Haus, H. Heinelt, & M. Stewart (Eds.). Urban governance and democracy: Leadership and community involvement. London & New York: Routledge.
Klok, P. J., Coenen, F., & Denters, B. (2006). Institutional conditions for complementarities between urban leadership and community involvement. In H. Heinelt, D. Sweeting, & P. Getimis (Eds.), Legitimacy and urban governance, a cross-national comparative study. London: Routledge, 265-285.
Lane, M. B. (2005). Public participation in planning: an intellectual history. Australian Geographer, 36(3), 283-299.
Long, N. (1992). From paradigm lost to paradigm regained? The case for an actor orientated sociology of development. In N. Long, & A. Long (Eds.), Battlefields of Knowledge: The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development. London: Routledge, 16-43.
Mitlin, D., & Thompson, J. (1995). Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or reinforcing the status quo? Environment and urbanization, 7 (1), 231-250.
Mosse, D. (2003). The making and marketing of participatory development. In P.V. Ufford, & A. Kumar Giri, A moral critique of development: in search of global responsibilities, (pp.43-75). London & New York: Routledge.
Motevasseli, M. (2013). Economic Development: Concepts, Theoretical Foundations, Institutionalist Approach and Methodology. Tehran: Samat. (in Persian)
Motevasseli, M., Samiee Nasab, M., & Nikoonesbati, A. (Eds. & Trans.). (2014). Institutions and Development (Articles Collection). Tehran: Imam Sadegh University Press. (in Persian)
Nelson, N., & Wright, S. (1995). Power and participatory development: theory and practice. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP).
North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American economic review, 84 (3), 359-368.
Ostrom, E. (2005a). Understanding institutional diversity (Vol. 241). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005b). Doing institutional analysis digging deeper than markets and hierarchies. In C. Ménard, & M. M. Shirley,Handbook of new institutional economics. Dordrecht: Springer, 819-848.
Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1), 7-27.
Ostrom, E. (2015). Understanding Institutional Diversity, (S. J., Mohseni Zanozi, Trans.). Tehran: Imam Sadegh University Press. (Original work published 2005). (in Persian)
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games and Common-Pool Resources, Ann Arbor. MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Peelle, E., Schweitzer, M., Munro, J., Carnes, S., & Wolfe, A. (1996). Factors favorable to public participation success. Report for U.S. Department of Energy. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Pretty, J., Guijt, I., Thompson, J., & Scoones, I. (1995). Participatory learning and action: A trainer's guide. IED.
Rabbani, R., Ghasemi, V., & Abbaszade, M. (2009). The Relationship between Social Welfare and Citizens Participation in Urban Affairs. Social Welfare Quarterly, 8 (32), 91-108. (in Persian)
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological conservation, 141 (10), 2417-2431.
Safaeipour, Z. (2017). A Study of Factors Affecting Public Participation in Urban Development (Case Study: Ilam). Journal of Urban Development Studies,1)1(, 140-111. (in Persian)
Scott, J. (1998). Address to the Seventh Annual Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Vancouver, 10-14 June.
Sharafi, M., Barkapour, N. (2012). Techniques of Citizens' Participation in Urban Planning and Management: Theoretical Theory and Practical Application. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publications. (in Persian)
Stimson, R. J., Stough, R., & Salazar, M. (2018). Leadership and institutions in regional endogenous development (M. Sharifzadegan, & B. MalekpourAsl, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (Original work published 2010). (in Persian)
Taleb M., Mirzaei, H., & Naderi, A. (2012). Evaluation of the role of public participation in rural development projects (Case study: combining plans in rural areas). Journal of Community Development (Rural and Urban Communities),4 (1), 1-18. (in Persian)
Uphoff, N. (1992). Monitoring and evaluating popular participation in World Bank assisted projects. In B. Bhatnagar, & A. Williams, Participatory Development and the World Bank, Discussion Papers Series No. 183. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Van Tatenhove, J. P., & Leroy, P. (2003). Environment and participation in a context of political modernisation. Environmental values, 12 (2), 155-174.
Verma, N. (2007). Institutions and planning: an analogical inquiry. in N. Verma (Ed.), Institutions and planning (pp. 1-16). Elsevier.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead, The Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (3), 595-613.
Yazdanpanah, L. (2007). Barriers to Social Participation of Tehran Citizens, Social Welfare, 7 (26), 105-130. (in Persian)
Urban Planning Knowledge
Volume 4, Issue 4
January 2021
Pages 37-62

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 25 April 2020
  • Revise Date: 01 July 2020
  • Accept Date: 15 August 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics