Developing a Theoretical and Conceptual Framework Explaining the Role of Land Property Rights in Urban Spatial Planning

Document Type : Theoretical Articles

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Conflicts between the rights of private landowners and the public interest and balancing between the two has always been one of the most important challenges of spatial planning. The increasing expansion of cities and insufficient supply of developable land have made right to use and develop, the most valuable resources and the ambiguity in defining and determining the owners of these rights has led to unproductive competition between landowners, developers and government agents, the conflicts of interests and increased spatial inequality. This trend has made the need to pay attention to institutional requirements in spatial planning more necessary.
Objectives: Therefore, the aim of this article is to explore what the land property rights and its components are and to explain the relationship and interaction between spatial planning and property rights institutions.
Methodology: This research is fundamental based on purpose, and qualitative in nature, and by adopting an explanatory-exploratory approach, it reviews and analyzes sources and texts systematically. Critical realism has been chosen as the philosophical position and retroduction as the logic of reasoning and strategy of the research.
Results: By Using the new institutionalist and property rights approach and applying institutional analysis, this article in addition to a theoretical framework, develops a conceptual framework that explain the relationship between spatial planning and land property rights institutions and how these rights are allocated in the city.
Conclusion: What the applied institutional analysis tell us is that the final products of the spatial planning system, such as zoning, regulations, building codes and permits, are a bundle of rights for each plot of land, and resolving the conflict of significant interests in urban land development requires a precise and clear definition of owner of each component of this bundle. Therefore, it is necessary for spatial planners to focus on how to allocate land property rights, optimally and to detemine owner of each right, clearly.

Keywords

References

Alchian, A. A. (1965). Some economics of property rights. Il Politico, 30, 816-829.
Alchian, A. A. (2008). Property rights In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Ed., by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume, Palgrave Macmillan.
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property rights paradigm. Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16–27.
Alexander, E. R. (2007). Planning rights and their Implications. Planning Theory,6(2), 112–126.
Alexander, E. R. (2001a). A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development: Towards the institutional analysis of public planning. Town Planning Review, 72, 45–75.
Alexander, E.R. (1994). The Non-Euclidean Mode of Planning What Is It To Be?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(3), 372-376. DOI: 10.1080/01944369408975594.
Alexander E .R. (1992) A Transaction Cost Theory of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2): 190–200.
Al-Ḥurr al-Āmili, M. (1989). Wasa'il al-Shia. Vol. 5. Qum: Publications of Aal al-Bayt Institute. (in Persian)
Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Blaikie, N. (2016). Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation (10nd Ed.)(Chavoshian, H. Trans.). Tehran: Nashre-Ney. (in Persian) (Original work published 2000)
Blomley, N. (2016) Land use, planning, and the “difficult character of property”, Planning Theory & Practice, DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1179336.
Bowers, J. (1992). The Economics of Planning Gain: a re-appraisal. Urban Studies, 29(8), 1329–1339. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43083446.
Booth, Ph. (2002) From Property Rights to Public Control: The Quest for Public Interest in the Control of Urban Development, Town Planning Review, 73(2), pp. 153-170.
Bromley, Daniel W. (1991). Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Brown, H.J. (1997) Introduction, In H. James Brown (ed.) Land Use and taxation. Applying the insights of Henry George, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Buitelaar, E. (2002). New institutional economics and planning: A different perspective on the market versus government debate in spatial planning. GAP working paper series, Vol. 11. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen School of Management.
Buitelaar, E. (2003). Neither market nor government: Comparing the performance of user rights regimes. Town Planning Review, 74(3), 315-330.
Buitelaar, E. (2007) The Cost of Land Use Decisions. Applying Transaction Cost Economics to Planning & Development. Blackwell Publishing, ISBN: 9781405151238.
Buitelaar, E., & Needham, B. (2007b). Epilogue: Property rights between tools and social values. Town Planning Review, 78(1),119–122.
Buitelaar, E., Needham, B. (2007a) Property rights and private initiatives: an introduction. Town Planning Review, 78(1), 1-8.
Cai, M. Murtazashvili, I. & Murtazashvili, J. (2019). The politics of land property rights. Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(2), 151–167. doi:10.1017/S1744137419000158.
Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296-312.
Carter, A. (1989). The Philosophical Foundations of Property Rights. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf
CEC. (1997). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies, Regional development studies, European Commission, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, ISBN 92-827-9752-X.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(3), 386–405.
Coase, R.H. (1960). The problem of social costs. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
 Cole, D. H., & Grossman, P. Z. (2002). The Meaning of Property Rights: Law versus Economics? Land Economics. 78, 317-330. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146892.
Dadashpoor, H., & Mohsenzadeh, S. (2012). Feasibility of using pattern of transfer development rights to protect agricultural lands and farms in urban area of Babolsar. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 12(25), 7-29. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=262765. (in Persian)
Davy, B. (2012). Land policy: Planning and the spatial consequences of property. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Davy, B. (2016). Land values as the social construction of scarcity. Der öffentliche Sektor - The Public Sector, 42(1), 131-145.
Demsetz, H. (1967). Towards a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 57(2), 347–359.
Fawaz, M. & Moumtaz, N. (2017). Of property and planning: a brief introduction. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(3), 345-350. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2017.1328805.
Fischel, W. A. (1978). A property rights approach to municipal zoning. Land Economics, 54(1), 64-81. DOI:10.2307/3146203.
Fischel, W. A. (2000). Zoning and land use regulation. In B. Boudewijn and G. DeGeest.(ed.) Encyclopedia of law and economics, 403-423. UK: Edward Elgar.
Freund, E. (1904). The Police Power, Public Policy and Constitutional Rights. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.
Gdesz, M. (2007) Protection of property right vs. expropriation of land for the purpose of constructing public roads, Paper presented at the Planning and Law Inaugural Symposium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 7-8 February.
Geuting, E. (2007). Proprietary governance and property development: Using changes in the property-rights regime as a market-based policy tool. Town Planning Review, 78(1), 23-39.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Grotius, Hugo. (1925) [1625]. The Law of War and Peace. Francis W. Kelsey (Trans.), Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Hartmann, Th. & Gerber, J. D. (2018). Land, scarcity, and property rights, In Gerber, J. D., Hartmann Th., Hengstermann A. (eds.), Instruments of land policy: dealing with scarcity of land, 3-7, New York: Routledge.
Havel, M. B. (2009). Property rights regime in land development - analysis of the influence of institutions on land development in terms of property rights theory. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland.
Havel, M. B. (2014). Delineation of property rights as institutional foundations for urban land markets in transition. Land Use Policy, 38, 615–626.
Havel, M. B. (2020). The Effect of Formal Property Rights Regime on Urban Development and Planning Methods in the Context of Post-Socialist Transformation: An Institutional Approach, In Levine-Schnur R.(ed.), Measuring the Effectiveness of Real Estate Regulation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 149-169, Switzerland: Springer.
Healey, P. (1999). Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of planning education and research, 19(2), 111-121.
Hohfeld, W. (1966). Fundamental Legal Conceptions, ed., Yale University Press, New Haven.
Hess, Ch. & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 111-145. 
Indrajit, A., Ploeger, H., Van Loenen B., and Van Oosterom, P., (2018). Designing Open Spatial Information Infrastructure to Support 3D Urban Planning in Jakarta Smart City. 6th International FIG 3D Cadastre Workshop,2-4 October, Delft, The Netherlands.
Jacobs H. M., Paulsen K. (2009). Property rights: The neglected theme of 20th-century American planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(2), 134-141.
Jütting, J. (2003). Institutions and Development: a Critical Review. OECD Development Centre, Working Paper, No.210.
Kheyroddin R, kamyar G, Dalaei Milan E. (2009). Balancing between property right and public interests in urban regeneration measures (from interest conflict to legal balance). Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture, 4(4), 22-39. URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-609-en.html. (in Persian)
Klein, D. & Robinson, J. (2011). Property: A Bundle of Rights? Prologue to the Property Symposium. Econ Journal Watch, 8, 193-204.
Krabben, E. van der. (2009). A Property Rights Approach to Externality Problems: Planning Based on Compensation Rules. Urban Studies, 46(13), 2869-2890. https://doi.org /10.1177/0042098009345537.  
Krueckeberg, D. A. (1995). The Difficult Character of Property: To Whom Do Things Belong?, Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), 301-309. DOI: 10.1080/01944369508975644.
Lai, L. W. C. (1994). The economics of land-use zoning: A literature review and analysis of the work of Coase. Town Planning Review, 65(1), 77–98.
Lai, L. W. C. (1997). Property rights justification for planning and a theory of zoning. Progress in Planning, 48, 161–246.
Lee SS, Webster CJ, Melián G, Calzada G, Carr R. (2013). A property rights analysis of urban planning in Spain and UK. Eur Plan Stud, 2(10):1475–1490.
Libecap, G. D. (1986). Property rights in economic history: Implications for research. Explorations in Economic History, 23(3), 227–252.
Libecap, G. D. (1989, 2003). Contracting for property rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lueck, D., & Miceli, T. J. )Eds.(. (2007). Property law. In: A. Polinsky & S. Shavell. Handbook of Law and Economics, 1, 183- 257.
Maleki, GH. (2013). Planning by development rights market. Tehran: IRSCE. (in Persian)
Meyer, N. (2012). Introduction to property rights: a historical perspective. University of Illinois Extension, available at https://web.extension.illinois.edu/lcr/propertyrights.cfm.
Motevaseli, M. (2004). Economic Development: Concepts, Theoretical Foundations, Institutionalist Approach and Methodology. Tehran: Sa’mt. (in Persian)
Mumford, L. (1931). The Brown Decades: a Study o f the Arts in America, 1865-1895. Dover Publications.
Nedae Tousi, S., Kazemian, G., Hardani, B. (2020). Institutional Causes and Obstacles of Converting Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Approach to Urban Development Policy (Case Study: District 9 of Isfahan Municipality). Physical Sacial Planning, 7(2), 11-32. doi: 10.30473/psp.2020.7004. (in Persian)
Needham, B. (2006). Planning, Law and Economics: The Rules We Make for Using Land. London: Routledge
Needham, B. (2015). Property Rights and Urban Planning. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Ed., 19, 184–189.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.
North, D. C. (1992). Transaction costs, institutions, and economic performance, International Center for Economic Growth Publication, San Francisco: ICS Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-40599-8.
Pawson, R. (1989). A Measure for Measures: A Manifesto for Empirical Sociology. London and New York: Routledge.
Rajaei, M. (2002). Property Rights and its stabilization strategies. Ma’rifat Journal, 11(53), 31-41. (in Persian)
Renard, V. (2007). Property Rights and the “Transfer of Development Rights”: Questions of Efficiency and Equity. The Town Planning Review, 78(1), 41–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40112701 .
Shahab, S. & Azizi, M. (2012). The Use of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) as an Implementation Mechanism of Urban Development Plans (Case Study: Kashan City, Iran). Motaleate Shahri, 1(4), 41-54. (in Persian)
Shahi Ardakani, M. & Jaberi Moghaddam, H. (2021). Requirements and challenges of imposing taxes from increasing the value and compensation of damages resulting from the implementation of urban development plans in Tehran. Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 10(35), 69-86. URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-1295-en.html. (in Persian)
Shin S. Lee, Christopher J. Webster, Gonzalo Melián, Gabriel Calzada & Richard Carr (2013) A Property Rights Analysis of Urban Planning in Spain and UK, European Planning Studies, 21(10),  475-1490, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722950.
Sorensen André. (2017(. New Institutionalism and Planning Theory. in ‘The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory’, Routledge.
Talebi, M. (2014). Introduction to philosophy of the right. Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
Tavana, M. (2015). The Paradigm of Critical Realism: Approach to an Interdisciplinary Methodology. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 7(1), 27-56. doi:10.7508/isih .2015.25.002. (in Persian)
Vandergert, P. M., (2005). Property Rights Dimensions of Forest Management and Control: Case Studies in the Solomon Islands and British Columbia, Canada. Unpublished doctoral thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England.
Verma, N. (ed.), (2007). Institutions and Planning. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Webster CH., (2005). The New Institutional Economics and the evolution of modern urban planning: Insights, issues and lessons. Town Planning Review, 76(4), 455-502.
Webster, CH. (2007). Property rights, public space and urban design. Town Planning Review, 78(1), 81–101.
Webster, CH., & Lai, L. W. C. (2003). Property rights, planning and markets: Managing spontaneous cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Urban Planning Knowledge
Volume 5, Issue 4
December 2021
Pages 189-211

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 September 2021
  • Revise Date: 12 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 09 January 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics