Sociability and vitality of urban public spaces: Evidence from the perspective of experts and users in Valiasr St., Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Mohaghegh Ardabili University

2 Professor, Department of Geography and urban Planning, Faculty of Humanity Science, University of Mohagheg Ardebili, Aedebil, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz

4 PhD in Geography and urban planning, university of Tehran

Abstract

Today, with the increasing trend of privatization of public spaces and its control in various ways; Sociability of public space, which is one of the pillars of urban vitality; Has been challenged.
On the other hand, lack of attention to the social dimension of vitality is observed in most studies. This study seeks to identify the most important indicators of sociability to achieve vitality in Valiasr St., Tehran from the perspective of experts and street users.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the two concepts of sociability and vitality in Valiasr Street, Tehran to use the results in urban public space planning.
Method:
In this regard, a comparative analysis is performed based on the views of experts on Valiasr Street and the users of this street. By adopting a combined approach with a sequential exploratory research design and using three methods of unstructured interview, observation committee and field observation, research data were collected.
Result:
A total of 7 main criteria were identified by experts, but 3 of these 7 criteria were not approved by users. The results were then discussed in two areas. First, it was found that, contrary to experts' views, criteria that are more collectivist are less preferred by users. There were also fundamental differences in the views of the two groups. So that the experts had a scientific but idealistic attitude towards the issues and issues of public spaces. While users' point of view is a simple, minimal but realistic view of their preferences and desires from a public space, which is based on their lived experience of public spaces.
Conclusion:
Finally, the realization of the sociability of public spaces depended on a series of requirements and underlying conditions that can be sought in the field of macro-political, institutional and social structures.

Keywords

References

 
Alikhah, F., & Shad Manfat, M. (2016). Lovers and the city; A study about youth and public spaces in
Rasht. Iranian Cultural Research, 9(1), 149-176. (In persian)
Andersson, C. (2016). Public space and the new urban agenda. The Journal of Public Space, 1(1), 5-10.
Bajçinovci, B. Q., Gjinolli, I., & Beqiri, R. (2018). Measuring Vitality of the Ottoman Public Space in
Kosovo Cities. Journal of Science, Humanities and Arts-JOSHA, 5(4), 10-11.
Buijs, A. E., Elands, B. H., & Langers, F. (2009). No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in
images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and urban Planning, 91(3), 113-123.
Carmona, M., De Magalhaes, C., & Hammond, L. (2008). Public space: the management dimension.
London: Routledge.
Carr, S., Stephen, C., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public Space (Cambridge
Series in Environment and Behavior). Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods approach. Sage publications.
Fakuhi, N. (2012). Wandering the city as a cultural thing. Herfeyeh Honarmand, 41, 1-7. (in persian)
Garvin, A. (2016). What makes a great city. Island Press.
Gehl, J. (2007). Public spaces for a changing public life. In C. W. Thompson & P. Travlou (Eds.), Open
space: People space (pp. 23-30). Taylor & Francis.
Gillenitz, A. (2007). Space and Social Theory (M. Shoorcheh, trans.). Tehran: Parhamnoghsh
Publications. (in persian)
Helmreich, W. B. (2013). The New York nobody knows. Princeton University Press.
Hubbard, P., & Lyon, D. (2018). Introduction: Streetlife–the shifting sociologies of the street. The
Sociological Review, 66(5), 937-951.
Johnson, P. (2001). Philosophy Hannah Arendt (K. Deihimi, Trans.). Tehran: new design. (in persian)
Kayden, J. S. (2000). Privately owned public space: the New York City experience. John Wiley & Sons.
Kazemi, A. (2013). Wandering and Iranian daily life. Tehran: Farhang Javid Publications. (in persian)
Lang, J. (1987). Creation of architectural theory; The role of behavioral sciences in environmental
design (A. Aeinifar, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (in persian)
Langstraat, F., & Van Melik, R. (2013). Challenging the ‘end of public space’: A comparative analysis
of publicness in British and Dutch urban spaces. Journal of Urban Design, 18(3), 429-448.
Lawson, B. (2007). Language of space. Routledge.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Lofland, L. H. (2017). The public realm: Exploring the city's quintessential social territory. Routledge.
Low, S., Taplin, D., & Scheld, S. (2009). Rethinking urban parks: Public space and cultural diversity.
University of Texas Press.
Lu, S., Huang, Y., Shi, C., & Yang, X. (2019). Exploring the associations between urban form and
neighborhood vibrancy: A case study of Chengdu, China. ISPRS International Journal of GeoInformation, 8(4), 165.
Madnipour, A. (1998). Tehran The Rise of a Metropolis (H. Zarazvand, Trans.). Tehran: Urban Planning
and Processing Publications. (in persian)
Madnipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city (F. Nourian, Trans.). Tehran: Urban
Processing and Planning Company. (in persian)
Moeini, M. (2012). Social streets, a place to linger and stay. Tehran: Tehran City Beautification
Organization. (in persian)
Mohammadpour, A. (2010). Fararosh Philosophical and Practical Foundations of Combined Research
Methods in Social and Behavioral Sciences. Tehran: Jamehshenasan Publications. (in persian)
Montgomery, J. (1995). Editorial urban vitality and the culture of cities. Planning Practice & Research,
10(2), 101-110.
Mortaz Mehrabani, A., Mansoori, S., & Javadi, S. (2017). Landscape approach in creating vitality of
Valiasr Street with emphasis on creating a sense of place, case study: Valiasr Street. Bagh-e Nazar,
14(55), 5-16. (in persian)
Pakzad, J. (2019). An Inquiry into the Concept and Status of Vitality. Journal of Urban Design
Discourse, Tarbiat Modares University, 1(1) 45-53. (in persian)
Park, K., Ewing, R., Sabouri, S., & Larsen, J. (2019). Street life and the built environment in an autooriented US region. Cities, 88, 243-251.
Paumier, C. (2007). Creating a Vibrant City Center. (ULI) Urban Land Institute Washingtin DC.
Peters, K., & De Haan, H. (2011). Everyday spaces of inter-ethnic interaction: the meaning of urban
public spaces in the Netherlands. Leisure/Loisir, 35(2), 169-190.
PPS Organization. (2009). What Makes a Successful Place? [WebSite]. Retrieved 2017, Nov. 12, from
https://www.pps.org/reference/grplacefeat/
Rastegar, N., Ahmadi, M., & Malek, M. (2014). Factors affecting the vitality of streets in downtown
Johor Bahru city. Indian Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 361-374.
Rezaeinia, H. (2018). Explaining the mechanisms of social production of public spaces in Tehran
(Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran). (in persian)
Sepe, M. (2017). The Role of Public Space to Achieve Urban Happiness. International Journal of
Sustainable Development and Planning, 2(4), 724-733.
Tahmasebi, F., Nazmafar, H., Ghanbari, A., & Rezaeinia, H. (2020). Evaluation and Analysis of Urban
Vitality Criteria Preferences in Valiasr St., Tehran. Shahr Paydar Journal, 3(1), 41-58. (in persian)
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral
research. SAGE publications.
Varna, G., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing the publicness of public space: The star model of
publicness. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 575-598.
Whyte, W. (1980). Social life of small urban space. Project for Public Spaces, US nonprofit
organization for creating and sustaining public places
 
Urban Planning Knowledge
Volume 6, Issue 2
2022
Pages 131-148

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 July 2021
  • Revise Date: 16 October 2021
  • Accept Date: 22 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics