Formulation of Place Criticism in Terms of Political Economy; Scrutinizing the "Urban-Relational"

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, The School of Architecture and Environmental Design/ University of Science and Technology of Iran

2 Ph.D. Student , The School of Architecture and Environmental Design/ Iran University of Science Technology, Tehran , Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Place is an intermediate layer or level as the urban-relational. This ontological conception of place which has a capacity for encountering complicated relationships and and contentions requires critical scrutiny for more elaboration. That aspect of critical urbanism is needed that embeds the redefined ontology in political and socioeconomic realities and explain place as a concrete abstraction.. Political economy is an approach to this achievement through a critique of the mode of place production and also related productive forces and relations.  In this way, lessons in Critical Theory could be as contributions to better understanding.  Based on this and the examination of the evolution of the political economy concept, some essential ideas can be proposed in the critique's framework of the political economy of urban places. An effort will be made to analyze the spatial manifestation of the main productive forces in eight sectors under the capitalist mode of production and to investigate the relationships between them, which have specific consequences on urban places.
Methodology: The research paradigm focuses on an integrative post-positivist and interpretations schemata and analyses social realities, following normative values of the place and mediating political and socioeconomic relations.The current study adopts a normative-critical epistemology and applies a deductive strategy and a qualitative method to peruse a coherent critical formation of place concept through the review of library documents and the description, analysis, and extension of various theoretical ideas and approaches.
Results: Critique of political economy within  an urban context includes eight rubrics: place as commodity and use value versus exchange value; consumption, spectacle, and commodity fetishism (a two-way conflict between use value and exchange value and the conquest of the latter over the former that occurred because of  the commodification of the city's real estate and collective consumption); private property versus the commons in urban places (a place that has a balanced content as an intermediary layer, and the micro level has a balanced role against the pressures from the macro level, can be a place for the establishment of shared ownership); capital accumulation, right to the city and inequality (The role-playing of the place as the urban-relational between the macro and micro levels leads to a conflict between the stronger and weaker subjects of these two levels. The balance or imbalance between these two levels of role-playing is directly related to the right to the city, the increase or decrease of inequality, and the stratification of the urban society.); state versus private sector; academy and market; and finally, dialectical nature of the place (Place as the urban-relational is in its essence a synthetic phenomenon and a product of the dialectical relationship between distant and close order).
Discussion: The scrutinizing of place as the "urban-relational " is the main goal of this research, and in this direction, the main challenge is to examine the most important concepts arising from the previous efforts of the authors by passing through the sieve of political economy as a critical approach. For this purpose, an effort is made to calculate the intersection of various and multiple aspects in view of the most advanced thinkers and commentators on political economy and its urbanized version. The review of the literature in political economy in order to find out what this concept is and then the examination of its evolution from the time of its creation in the late 18th century until today revealed its content orientations and trends in different periods. Then, with the help of the formed theoretical framework, and by taking advantage of a comprehensive review of the opinions of some of the most prominent urban scientists, an attempt is made to establish a connection between the theoretical framework and urban issues and to provide a relatively comprehensive analysis of the issues affecting urban places from the perspective of political economy in the sections emerging from the theoretical framework.
Conclusion:It should be acknowledged that the "urban-relational" can only have an active mediation in order to improve the level of placeness in cities when it can have an effective function in the production method that governs it, which is associated with specific production forces and relationships. Place as the urban-relational rests on productive forces and relations by which a mode of production is explained and elaborated. The efficient function of place as the urban-relational within the influential mode of production is conditioned by some potentialities and impotentialities interfering in the scrutinization of place.

Keywords

References

References
Adorno, T. (1991). The culture industry reconsidered. In Adorno, T. The Culture Industry, London: Routledge, 85–92.
Adorno, Theodor. (2009). Against Idealism (Translated by Morad Farhadpour), Gam-E-No Publication, 2th edition. (in persian)
Agamben, G. (1999). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen, Stanford University Press
Akhoundi, Abbas. (2019). Urban Regeneration and avoindance of city purchasing as only solution of rescuing citities, Speech in forum of urban planning commissions of Islamic Councils of states centers, 14th November. (in persian)
Anikin, Andreĭ Vladimirovich. (1979). A Science in Its Youth: Pre Marxian-Political Economy (Translated by Naser Gilani). Tehran: Tirang publication. 1th edition. (in persian) 
Antoniadis, P., & Apostol, I. (2014). The right(s) to the hybrid city and the role of DIY networking. The Journal of Community Informatics, 10(3).
Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy, Public Culture, 2(2), 1–24.
Azadarmaki, Taghi. (2009). Thories of sociology, Tehran: Soroush publication, 6th edition. (in persian)
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–31.
Barzegar, Sepideh & Habibi, Mitra. (2020). Exploring rhythm of daily life in organization of urban space consumption, journal of Urban Planning Knowledge 4(1). 49-71.  (in persian) 
Bashiriyeh, Hossein. (2020). A History of Political thought in twentieth century Volume 1, Tehran, Nashr-e-Nay, 16th edition. (in persian)
Basiri Mozhdehi, Reza. Daneshpour, Abolhadi & Alalhesabi, Mehran. (2020). Redefining the ontology of place as the urban-relational process. Bagh-e Nazar, 17(90), 5-20. (in persian)
Bayani, Farhad., Golabi, Fatemeh. & Alipour, Parvin. (2015). Lifeworld or System? Lifeworld and System? In Jürgen Habermas thought; Rahbord journal, 24(77). (in persian)
Binandeh, Masod, Mahmoodi, Jahingir, & Sanaee, Ali. (2020). Urban Spatial Policies and the Right to the City: Institutional Ethnography of subalterns Urban Neighborhoods, journal of Sociology of Culture and Art, 2(3). (in persian)
Blackmar, E. (2005). Appropriating ‘the Commons’: The Tragedy of Property Rights Discourse. In Low, S. and Smith, N. (Eds.) the Politics of Public Space, New York: Routledge.
Boano C, Garcia Lamarca M and Wade A. (2014). Deconstructing and recalibrating urban design in the global south, in Explorations in Urban Design Edited by Marrhew Carmona, Routledge
Bottomore, T. (1983). A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Oxford: Blackwell
Brenner, N (2009). What is critical urban theory?, City: analysis of urbantrends, culture, theory, policy, action, 13:2-3, 198-207
Brenner, Neil. (2017). What is critical urban theory? (Translated by Aidin Torkameh), space and dialectic journal, 5. (in persian)‌‌
Bronner. S Eric. (1994).  Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists,1st Edition–London: Basil Blackwell
Burnet, John. (2005). Early Greek Philosophy. 3rd. A & C Black. London
Caporaso, James & Levine. David .(2008). Theories of political economy (Translated by Mahmoud Abdollahzadeh). Tehran: Sales publication. 1th edition. (in persian)
Carmona, M. et.al. (2000). Value of Urban Design, Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
Cassirer. E. (1944). An Essay on Man, An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture, Yale University Press
Castells, M.  (1983). The City and the Grassroots, a Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social, University of California Press
Castells, M. (1972) [1977]. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach, The MIT Press
Castells, M. (1978). City, Class and Power. London; New York, MacMillan; St. Martins Press
Castells, Manuel. (2006). The Information age; The rise of the network society (Translated by Ahmad Aligholian & Afshin Khakbaz). Tehran: Tarh-e-no publication, 2th edition, (in persian)
Chardronnet, E. (2003). The History of Unitary Urbanism and Psychogeography at the Turn of the Sixties, lecture notes for a conference in Riga Art + Communication Festival, May 2003
Chilcote, Ronald H. (2017). Theories of comparative politics: the search for a paradigm reconsidered (Translated by Vahid Bozorgi & Alireza Tib). Tehran: Rasa publication, 6th edition. (in persian)
Clark, Barry. (2017). Political economy: a comparative approach (Translated by Abbas Hatami). Tehran: Kavir publication. 3th edition. (in persian)
Craib, Ian. (2014). Modern social theory: from parsons to Habermas (Translated by Abbas Mokhber). Tehran: Agah publication. 1th edition. (in persian)
Creswell, John W. (2016). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Translated by Alireza Kiamanesh & Maryam Danay Tous). Tehran: Jahad daneshgahi publication, 4th edition. (in persian)
Cuff, D. (2003). Immanent domain – pervasive computing and the public realm, Journal of Architectural Education, 57(1): 43–49.
Cuthbert, A. (2003). Designing Cities: Critical Readings in Urban Design, Wiley
Cuthbert, A. (2006). The Form of Cities: Political Economy and Urban Design, Wiley
Cuthbert, A. (2011). Understanding Cities Method in Urban Design, Routledge
Cuthbert, A. (2014). Alphaville and Masdar: The future of urban space and form Design, in Emergent Urbansim edited by tigran Haas & KristEr Olsson, Ashgate Publishing limited
Cuthbert, A.(1995). The right to the citysurveillance, private interest and the public domain in Hong Kong, Cities, 12(5): 293–310.
Dadashpour, H., & Yazdanian, A. (2019). How to Read the Space? From Phenomenological to the Critical Reading of Space. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(2), 1-14. (in persian)
Debord, G. (1967) [2004].  The Society of the Spectacle, translated by Ken Knabb, Rebel Press 
Debord, Guy. (2016). The Society of the Spectacle (Translated by Behrouz safdari). Tehran: Agah publication, 3th edition. (in persian)
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, translated by Brian Massumi, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dovey K (1999). Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form, London, Routledge
Edel, Matthew. (1997). Urban and Regional Economics—Marxist Perspectives (Translated by Fariborz Raisdana), Tehran: Ghatreh publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Ehsani.Kaveh. (2019). The Built Urban Environment and the Formation of the Industrial Working Class (Translated by Maral Latifi). Tehran: Shirazeh publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Florida, R. (2003). The Rise of the Creative Class, Melbourne: Pluto
Ghanbarlou, abdollah. (2019). Criticism of neoliberalism from the perspective of the Frankfurt School, Basic western studies journal, 10(1). (in persian)
Ghorbani, Mohammadreza. (1979). Popular Political Economy. Tehran: Peyvand publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Goonewardenaو Kanishka. (2005). The urban sensorium: Space, ideology and the aestheticization of politics, Antipode, 37, 1, Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc. p.p 46-71
Gordon, D. 1977. Capitalism and the Roots of the Urban Crisis. In Alcally and Mermelstein 1977
Gottdiener, Mark. (2020). The social production of urban space (Translated by Aidin Torkameh). Tehran: TEHRAN URBAN RESEARCH AND PLANNING CENTER publication. 1th edition. (in persian)
Habibi, S. M., Ameli, S. R., & Ashtari, D. (2019). The Space of the Flows and the Space of the Places, From Contrast to Interaction: Exploring the Effects of the New Technologies on the Characteristics of the Urban Space. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(1), 109-124. (in persian)
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. In Baden, J. and Noonan, D. (Eds.) Managing the Commons, Indianapolis, IN: University of Indiana Press.
Hardt, M and Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Harvey D (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism, Geografiska Annaler Series B, 71(1): 3–17.
Harvey, D. (1979). Social Justice and the City, London: Edwin Arnold.
Harvey, D. (1982). The Limits to Capital, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital, John Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography, Routledge
Harvey, D. (2003). Paris, Capital of Modernity, Routledge
Harvey, D. (2006a). The Spaces of Global Capitalism, London: Verso.
Harvey, D. (2006c). The political economy of public space, In S.Low & N. Smith (Eds). The politics of public space. pp. (17-34) Routledge. LondonHarvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, London: Verso.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, VERSO London • New York
Harvey, D.(2013). On Why Struggles over Urban Space Matter: An Interview with Harvey, by HibaBou Akar and NadaMoumtaz
Harvey, David (2006b): A Critical Reader, Edited by Noel Castree and Derek Gregory, Blackwell
Harvey, David. (2013). The Importance of post-Capitalist Imagination (Translated by Parviz sedaghat), www.pecritique.com. (in persian)
Harvey, David. (2016). The transformation in urban governacance in late capitalism (Translated by Iman Vaghefi), https://meidaan.com/archive/22348. (in persian)
Harvey, David. (2018). Why Marx's Capital Still Matters (Translated by Rahman Bouzari), https://barkhatbook.com/blog/post/57. (in persian)
Harvey, David. (2019). Socialism and Freedom (Translated by Hossein Rahmati), https://pecritique.com/2019/10/12. (in Persian)
Herman, A. (2002). The Scottish Enlightenment –The Scots’ Invention of the Modern World, London: Fourth Estate.
Hess, C. and Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Hosseinali Nozari. (2005). The Critical Theories of The Frankfurt School in social and human sciences. Tehran: Agah publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Hubbard P (1996). Urban design and city regeneration: social representations of entrepreneurial landscapes, Urban Studies, 33(8):1441–62.Javanshir (Mizani, Farajollah). (2016). Political economy; Mode of Production in Capitalism. Tehran: Ferdos publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Judi Gollor, Poya, Zamanian, Rozbeh & Fathi, Hamid. (2015). Tracking the notin of justie in city and urbanizatin theories: critial urban theory and the theory of the right to the city. Haftshahr journal, 49-50. (in persian)
Katznelson, I. (1976). The Crisis of the Capitalist city: Urban Politics and Social control. In W. Hawley et al., eds.s Theoretical Perspectives on Urban Politics. Engelwood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall
Katznelson, I. (1982). City Trenches: Urban Politics And The Patterning Of Class In The United States, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press
Katznelson, I. (1992). Marxism and the City. Oxford University Press.
Knox, P.L. (1982). The social production of the built environment, Ekistics, 49 (295): 291–297.
Kotányi, A. and Vaneigem, R. (1961). Basic Program of the Bureau of Unitary Urbanism, trans. K. Knabb. <http://www.bopsecrets.org/ SI/6.unitaryurb.htm> (accessed 15 March 2009).
Kumic, I. (2008). Revealing the competitive city, spatial political economy and city brands, Doctoral Thesis, Sydney University.
Lefebvre, H. (1968) [1996]. The Right to the City, translated by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas from Writings on Cities, Blackwell Publishers Inc
Lefebvre, H. (1970) [2003]. The Urban Revolution, translated by Robert Bononno, University of Minnesota Press
Lefebvre, H. (1970). Le manifeste différentialiste, Gallimard
Lefebvre, H. (1974) [1991]. The production of space, translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith , Wiley-Blackwell
Lefebvre, H. (1979). space: social product and use value, in j. Freiberg, ed., Critical Sociology: European perspective, New York, Irvington Publishers
Lefebvre, H. (2000). Writings on Cities, Selected, translated and introduced by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas, Blackwell Publishers Inc
Lefebvre, Henri. (2016). The survival of capitalism: reproduction of the relations of production (Translated by Aidin Torkameh). Tehran: Tisa publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
MadaniPour, A. (2014).  Creativity, Diversity and Interaction: Urban Space and Place-Making. in Emergent Urbanism edited by tigran Haas & KristEr Olsson, Ashgate Publishing limited
MalekpourAsl, B. (2019). Rethinking About the Relationship between Urban Design and Planning: A Return to the Roots. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(2), 15-31. (in persian)
Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 13:2-3, 185-197.
Marx, Karl. (2018). The German ideology (Translated by Tirdad Niki). Tehran: Ferdous publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender, Polity Press: Cambridge
Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
Metzger, J. (2014). The Subject of Place: Staying with the Trouble, in Emergent Urbansim edited by tigran Haas & KristEr Olsson, Ashgate Publishing limited
Monbiot, G. (2012). The Gaurdian Weekly. 14 February 2012: 18
Nagel, T. (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nikitin, Petr Ivanovich. (2008). The fundamentals of poliitca economy (Translated by Naser Zarafshan). Tehran: Agah publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Norberg-Shulz, Christian. (2003). Architecture: meaning and place (Translated by Vida Norouz Borazjani. Tehran: Jan-e-Jahan publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Orueta, F.D. and Fainstein, S. )2008(. The new mega-projects; genesis and impacts. International Journal of
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press
Payne, Michael. (2003). A dictionary of cultural and critical theory (Translated by Payam Daneshjoo). Tehran: Markaz Publication, 2th edition. (in persian)
Postone, M. (1993) Time, Labor and Social Domination: A Re-interpretation of Karl Marx's Critical Social Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Postone, M. (1999). Contemporary historical transformations: beyond postindustrial theory and neo-marxism, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 19, 3-53.
Poulantzas, N. (1973). Political Power and social classes. London: New Left Books
Poulantzas, N. (1976). Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: New Left Books
Purcell, M. (2013). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs 36, 141- 254
radicalphilosophy.com/commentary/longing-for-a-greener-present [accessed 28 February 2013].
Rahmani, M., Azizi, M. M., & Nourian, F. (2019). Finding the Roots of the Contemporary Problems of Tehrān Based On the Philosophical Hermeneutic Approach. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(3), 1-20. (in persian)
Rancière J (2001). Ten Theses on Politics, Theory and Event, 5(3): 20.
Ritzer, George. (2012). Contemporary sociological theory (Translated by Mohsen Salasi). Tehran: elmi publication. 17th edition. (in persian)
Sadeghi Fasayi, Soheyla & Erfanmanesh, Iman. (2015). Documentary  Research Method in Social Scinence; strategy culture journal, 8(29), 61-941. (in persian)
Salehi Amiri, Seyd reza. (2007). Cultural Concepts and Theories, Tehran: Ghoghnous publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Saunders, Peter. (2012). Social theory and the urban question (Translated by Mahmoud Sharepour). Tehran: Tisa, 1th edition. (in persian)
Schmitt, Carl. (1932). The Concept of the Political (Translated by Yashar Jobrani & Rasoul Namazi). Tehran: Ghoghnous publication, 2th edition. (in persian)
Serres, M. )1995.( Genesis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
Sharifzadegan, M. H., & Hosseinabadi, M. (2020). The Role of Market and State in Spatial Urban Planning: From Confrontation toward Engagement in New Institutionalism. Urban Planning Knowledge, 4(3), 1-18. (in persian)
Sharifzadegan, Mohammad Hossein, Nedayi Tousi, Sahar. (2015). Qualitative Research Methods in Development Planning; Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Sklair, L. (2005). The transnational capitalist class and contemporary architecture in globalizing cities, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(3): 485–500.
Slater, Don & Tonkiss, Fran . (2001). Market Society: Markets and Modern Social Theory (Translated by Hossein Ghazian), Tehran: Ney publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Smith, Robin. (2009). Aristotle’s theory of demonstration. In A Companion to Aristotle, edited by Anagnostopoulos. Blackwell.
Soja. E. (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso Press,
Soja. E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places, Blackwell, 1 edition
Soja. E. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell,
Soja. E. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice, University of Minnesota Press
Tafazzoli, Ferydoun. (1996). A Hostoty of Economic beliefs. Tehran: Nashr-e-Nay, 2th edition. (in persian)
Tavakol, M. (1990). Sociology of Knowledge: Theoretical Problems. New Delhi: Sterling.
Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial Formations. London: Sage Publications Urban and Regional Research. 32 (4), 759–67.
Zali, N., Abizadeh, S., & Bagherinia, A. (2013). New urbanism and urban design: Tools for changing behavioral patterns of the citizens. International Journal of Natural & Engineering Sciences, 7(1), 31-36.
Zali, N., Ebrahimzadeh, I., Zamani-Poor, M., & Arghash, A. (2014). City Branding Evaluation and Analysis of Cultural Capabilities of Isfahan City. European Spatial Research and Policy, 21(2), 213-234
Zieleniec, Andrzej. (2017). Space and social theory (Translated by Aidin Torkameh). Tehran: elmi o Frahangi publication, 1th edition. (in persian)
Zukin, S. (1996). The Culture of Cities, Cambridge MA: Blackwell.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 11 May 2021
  • Revise Date: 10 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 23 October 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics