Towards an institutionalist conceptual model on the management of disasters and natural disasters with emphasis on urban floods

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Crisis and natural disasters are one of the basic fields in decision-making and public policy, which has significant connections with the planning and management system in cities. The importance of this area lies in the need to establish the stability and resilience of cities before and after the occurrence of natural disasters. Iran has always been vulnerable to crises, especially natural disasters. Phenomena such as floods and their types in cities have multiple and multifaceted unpredictable characteristics, and the optimal management patterns require specific and comprehensive analytical models in this field.
Research in disasters shows that although these disasters affect all countries around the world; However, the set of natural and social risk factors in different countries depends strongly on the set of differences in the social and political systems of these nations in different. This citation shows a very prominent and very effective factor in regulating the structure and process of disaster and natural disaster management in all countries of the world called "institutions".
 According to this problem, the knowledge of crisis management based on the set of successful and unsuccessful practical experiences is constantly looking for the improvement of the set of theoretical and practical models effective in the efficient management of natural disasters in order to establish a faster and more favorable normal life cycle in times of crisis, especially after the occurrence of a crisis.
Therefore, with the help of this critical approach and the use of the current accumulated achievements of knowledge, such as the links between planning theory and institutionalism, it is possible to expand the capacities of institutionalism in the knowledge of urban planning and aspects of crisis management and urban safety.
Nowadays the institutional aspects of crisis management have gradually opened their place in the scientific and professional structure of natural disaster management; however, it lacks form comprehensive necessary guiding structures of the capacities of institutionalism in disaster and natural disaster management.Specifically, from the perspective of Iran, considering the challenges of management and policy-making in crisis and disaster management, such as the gaps in the existing crisis management laws and its noticeable weaknesses failure to consider all Hazards in disaster management and planning. Paying a lot of attention to disasters such as earthquakes and ignoring other disasters such as floods, not fully adopting an institutional approach to disaster management, lack of innovative and creative institutional structuring. It emphasizes the necessity of gradually approaching the application of new institutionalism and the connection between the dimensions of new institutionalism and the management of disasters and natural hazards, including the management of urban floods in the geography of Iran.
Methodology: The approach of research is Qualitative and is based on the technique of secondary analysis of theoretically available texts in  planning, planning theory, and crisis management from the perspective of institutionalism and documentary research methods.
Results : By integrating the capacities of neo-institutionalism in the knowledge of urbanism; presented an institutionalist conceptual model in crisis management specifically; in which the three building blocks of "institutional conceptual network", "institutional damages and pitfalls" and "institutional analytical and evaluation models" can be displayed together, the research has filled the gaps on current knowledge in this field, especially among domestic texts.
Discussion: The rich theoretical capacity of disaster and natural disaster management shows the possibility of synergizing this platform with the conceptual and operational models of institutionalism and accordingly previous gaps can be solved with new readings with the help of versatile mediators such as "planning theory" and thus, the common levels of these two scientific streams could be closer to each other
Conclusion: First, the introduced model shows the wide capacities of institutionalism in natural disaster management, including complex disasters such as urban floods, and second, it shows the deep theoretical and practical capabilities of institutionalism in  natural disaster management, and third, the model shows the possibility of synergizing the capacities and capabilities of institutionalism in natural disaster management. Finally, it can be said the current proposed model is one models in common between institutionalism and the natural disaster management field, besides  the possibility of raising theoretical studies in crisis management; It can be oriented for applied studies in the field of disaster management like flood management in various technical, managerial and decision-making sub-fields.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References
Abebe, Y. A., Ghorbani, A., Nikolic, I., Vojinovic, Z., & Sanchez, A. (2019). A coupled flood-agent-institution Modelling (CLAIM) framework for urban flood risk management. Environ. Model. Softw., 111, 483-492.
Albrechts, L. (2003). Reconstructing decision-making: Planning versus politics. Planning theory, 2(3), 249-268.
Alexander, E. R. (1992). A transaction cost theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2), 190-200.
Alexander, E. R. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning theory, 4(3), 209-223.
Amin, A. (1998). An institutional perspective on regional development. In Economic Geography Research Group Seminar, ‘Institutions and Governance (Vol. 3).
Ardalan, D., Davoudpour, Z., & Ziari, K. (2020). Analysis of Institutional resilience structure for transition from crisis management to urban management resilience against earthquake (Case Study: Qazvin City). Motaleate Shahri, 9(36), 69-84. (In Persian)
Baird, J. & R. Plummer. 2020. Water Resilience: Management and Governance in Times of Change. Springer Nature.
Beauregard, R. (2022). The documents of re-zoning: planning aspirations in New York City. In Regulation and Planning (pp. 15-26). Routledge.
Bergsma, E. (2018). From Flood Safety to Spatial Management: Expert-Policy Interactions in Dutch and US Flood Governance. Cham: Springer.
Brown, R. R. (2008). Local institutional development and organizational change for advancing sustainable urban water futures. Environmental management, 41(2), 221-233.
Cheema, A. R., Mehmood, A., & Imran, M. (2016). Learning from the past: Analysis of disaster management structures, policies and institutions in Pakistan. Disaster Prevention and Management, 25(4), 449-463.
Clement, F. (2010). Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences, 43(2), 129-156.
Cohen, J. M. (1994). Capacity building, methodology and the language of discourse in development studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Institute for International Development.
Cole, D., G. Epstein & M. McGinnis (2019). Combining the IAD and SES frameworks. International Journal of the Commons, 13, 1-32.
Cole, D. H., Epstein, G., & McGinnis, M. D. (2014). Toward a New Institutional Analysis of Social-Ecological Systems (NIASES): Combining Elinor Ostrom's IAD and SES Frameworks. Indiana legal studies research paper, (299).
Commons. J. R .(1389). "Institutional Economics"", in Compilation and Translation    by  Motevaseli, M., Mashoudi Ahmad, M., Niconesbati, A., Samii Nasab, M." Institutional crisis, institutional pioneers who revolutionized economics", Tehran: Imam Sadegh University Press, first edition. (In Persian)
De Bruijn, K. M., Green, C., Johnson, C., & McFadden, L. (2007). Evolving concepts in flood risk management: searching for a common language. In Flood risk management in Europe (pp. 61-75). Springer, Dordrecht.
Dehghani, M., Haghighatnaeini, G., & Zebardast, E. (2021). Institutional Capacity Analysis of Isfahan Knowledge-Based Urban Development. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 13(31), 5-22. (In Persian)
Emami, P. (2021). Rethinking Flood Risk Management. Unpublished PhD Thesis in Social and Ecological Sustainability (Water), University of Waterloo.
Erlich, M. (2007). OSIRIS–an example of citizen-oriented technology development in the area of dissemination of information on flood risk management. In Flood Risk Management in Europe (pp. 43-60). Springer, Dordrecht.
Faraji Rad, Kh. & Kazemian, Gh. (2011). Local and regional development from the perspective of institutional approach, Tehran: Academic Jahad Publishing Organization, first edition. (In Persian)
Farajirad, K., Kazemian, G., & Rokneddin Eftekhari, A. (2013). Pathology of Regional Development Policies in Iran: An Institutional Approach. Management and Development Process, 26(2), 27-58. (In Persian)
Frimpong Boamah, E. (2022). Planning as polycentric: Institutionalist lessons for communicative and collaborative planning in Global South contexts. Planning Theory, 14730952221115871.
Fuchs, S. (2009). Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria –Paradigms of vulnerability revisited. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9 (2), 337–52.
Ghasemzadeh, B., Zarabadi, Z. S. S., Majedi, H., Behzadfar, M., & Sharifi, A. (2021). A framework for urban flood resilience assessment with emphasis on social, economic and institutional dimensions: A qualitative study. Sustainability, 13(14), 7852.
Ghashghaeezadeh, N., Moradi, A., Malekian, A., Holisaz, A., & Mahdavi, R. (2018). Urban Water Challenge and Urban Runoff Management Scenarios (Case study: Parts of Bandar Abbas City). Urban Planning Knowledge, 2(3), 71-83. (In Persian)
Gibbs, D. C., Jonas, A. E., Reimer, S., & Spooner, D. J. (2001). Governance, institutional capacity and partnerships in local economic development: theoretical issues and empirical evidence from the Humber Sub‐region. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 103-119.
Givehchi, Saeed (2009). Urban planning in order to prevent and reduce the effect of Crisis, first edition, Tehran: Hilal Institute of Higher Scientific and Applied Education of Iran. (In Persian)
Hamilton, Walton (1389). "Institutional Approach to Economic Theory", in Compilation and Translation    by  Motevaseli, M., Mashoudi Ahmad, M., Niconesbati, A., Samii Nasab, M." Institutional crisis, institutional pioneers who revolutionized economics", Tehran: Imam Sadegh University Press, first edition. (In Persian)
Handmer, J.; Dovers, S. (2007). The Handbook of Disaster and Emergency Policies and Institutions, Sterling: Earthscan.
Hataminejad, H., Latifi, O., Farhadi, E., & Abbasi, M. (2021). An Analysis of Economic and Institutional Resilience Against Floods in Izeh Neighborhoods. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 11(40), 131-158. (In Persian)
Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and planning A, 30 (9), 1531-1546.
Healey, P. (2005). On the project of ‘institutional transformation ‘in the planning field: Commentary on the contributions. Planning Theory, 4(3), 301-310.
Healey, P (2007), The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning, In Niraj, Verma (ed). Institutions and Planning, Elsevier, New York.
Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2001). Neo-Marshallian nodes, institutional thickness, and Britain's ‘Motor Sport Valley’: thick or thin? Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1169-1183.
Heshmati Jadid, M., Soleimani Mehranjani, M., Zanganeh, A., Prizadi, T. (2019). Explaining the role of institutional capacity in promoting urban resilience in environmental crises, Defense Policy Journal, 28 (111): 1-28.(In Persian)
Heydari Nejat, A .(2018). Government and coping with natural disasters in the past one hundred and ten years, policymaking and crisis management in natural disasters from 1397-1287, Tehran: New Note, first edition. (In Persian)
Hilhorst, D. (2003). Unlocking disaster paradigms: an actor-oriented focus on disaster response. Abstract submitted for Session, 3.
Hill, M. (2005). The public policy processes. Pearson Education Limited.
Hochrainer, S. (2006). Macroeconomic risk management against natural disasters: Analysis focused on governments in developing countries. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
Hodgson, G. M .(2009). "What is the essence of institutional economics", in Compilation and Translation    by  Motevaseli, M., Mashoudi Ahmad, M., Niconesbati, A., Samii Nasab, M." Institutional crisis, institutional pioneers who revolutionized economics", Tehran: Imam Sadegh University Press, first edition. (In Persian)
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koontz, T. M. (2003). An introduction to the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework for forest management research. First Nations and Sustainable Forestry: Institutional Conditions for Success.
Koontz, T. M. (2003). An introduction to the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework for forest management research. First Nations and Sustainable Forestry: Institutional Conditions for Success.
Lebel, L. (2012). Assessing Institutional Capacities for Flood Disaster Risk Reduction.
Lebel, L., & Lebel, P. (2017). Policy narratives help maintain institutional traps in the governance of floods in Thailand. International journal of water resources development, 34(4), 616-631.
Liu, Y. (2013).” Foreword II”, In Peijun Shi, Carlo Jaeger, Qian Ye (Eds). Integrated Risk Governance Science Plan and Case Studies of Large-scale Disasters, Shi, P., Jaeger, C., & Ye, Q. (Eds.). (2013).
Integrated risk governance: Science plan and case studies of large-scale disasters (p. 243). London: Springer.
Maleki, S., Ārvin, M., & Bazrafkan, S. (2019). The role of good urban governance in the realization of the resilient city (A case study of Ahwāz city). Urban Planning Knowledge, 2(4), 1-18. (In Persian)
Maleki, L., Majedi, H., & Zarabadi, Z. S. S. (2021). Analyzing the Role of Urban Approaches in Response to Climate Changes with Emphasis on Biophilic Urbanism, A Case Study: Tonekabon City. Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(1), 147-163. (In Persian)
McEntire, D. A. (2005). Emergency management theory: Issues, barriers, and recommendations for improvement, Journal of Emergency Management, 3(3): 44-54.
Mohibbullah, M., Gain, A. K., & Ahsan, M. N. (2021). Examining local institutional networks for sustainable disaster management: Empirical evidence from the South-West coastal areas in Bangladesh. Environmental Science & Policy, 124, 433-440.
Molenveld, A., & van Buuren, A. (2019). Flood risk and resilience in the Netherlands: In search of an adaptive governance approach. Water, 11(12), 2563.
Moroni, S. (2010). An evolutionary theory of institutions and a dynamic approach to reform. Planning Theory, 9(4), 275-297.
Motevaseli, Mahmoud. (1400). Economic development, concepts, theoretical foundations, institutional approach and methodology, Tehran: Samt Publications, 12th edition. (In Persian)
Motvaseli, M., Beigi, E., & Farmahini Farahani, B. (2020). Application of Elinor Ostrom's Institutionalism in Development Planning. Program and Development Research, 1(3), 10-35. (In Persian)
Naeb,S. (2016 ). The features of Explanation In the Theoretical System of Modern Institutionalism. Journal of Iranian Economic Issues, 3(1), 61-83. (In Persian)
 North, D.C (2000). The structure of transformation in economic history, translated by Gholamreza Azad eramaki, Tehran: Ney Publishing House, first edition. (In Persian)
North, D. C. (2015). Institutions, institutional changes and economic performance, translated by Mohammad Reza Moini, Tehran: Organization of Management and Planning of the country, second edition(In Persian).
North, D.C (2018). Understanding the process of economic transformation, translated by Mir Saeed Mohajerani, Zahra Farzizadeh, Tehran: Institutional Publications, third edition. (In Persian)
National report of floods (2018). The National Report of the Special Committee on Floods, the final volume: narration, analysis, lessons learned and Recommendations. (In Persian)
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton university press
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan press.
Papathoma-Köhle, M. A. R. I. A., & Thaler, T. (2018). “Institutional vulnerability” In “Vulnerability And Resilience To Natural Hazards”, SVEN FUCHS, THOMAS THALER (Eds)”.(pp. 98-124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paul, B. K. (2011). Environmental hazards and disasters–context, perspectives and management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Putra, D. I., & Matsuyuki, M. (2019). Disaster management following decentralization in Indonesia: Regulation, institutional establishment, planning, and budgeting. Journal of Disaster Research, 14(1), 173-187.
Rafiyan, M., Asgari, A., Ejjali, P , (2019). Planning theory, traditional and new perspectives, Tehran: Agah Publishing House, 8th edition. (In Persian)
Ran, A., Fan, J., Zhou, L., & Zhang, C. (2020). Geo-Disaster Governance under the IAD Framework: The Case Study of Chongqing’s Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Sustainability, 12(14), 5517.
Raeis Dana, F . (2004). Approach and method in economics, Tehran: Aghah publication, first edition. (In Persian)
Restrepo-Mieth, A. (2023). Examining the Dynamics Between Formal and Informal Institutions in Progressive City Planning. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 99-132.
Rutherford, Malcolm. (2009). "Institutional economics past and present""", in Compilation and Translation    by  Motevaseli, M., Mashoudi Ahmad, M., Niconesbati, A., Samii Nasab, M." Institutional crisis, institutional pioneers who revolutionized economics", Tehran: Imam Sadegh University Press, first edition. (In Persian) 
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). The need for better theories. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 3-17). Colorado: Westview Press.
Salet, W. G. (2002). Evolving institutions: an international exploration into planning and law. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(1), 26-35.
Sanyal, B. (2007). Déjà-vu. Planning theory, 6(3), 327-331.
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). The need for better theories. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 3-17). Colorado: Westview Press.
Schlager, E., Siddiki, S., & Cox, M. (2021). Methods for Analyzing Social Dilemmas and Institutional Arrangements within the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In Methods of the Policy Process (pp. 208-232). Routledge.
Schumann, A. H., & Nijssen, D. (2011). Application of scenarios and multi-criteria decision-making tools in flood polder planning. In Flood risk assessment and management (pp. 249-275). Springer, Dordrecht.
Sharifzadegan, M., & MalekpourAsl, B. (2016). An Institutional Approach to Local Endogenous Development Planning (in Persian). The Journal of Planning and Budgeting , 20(4), 155-184.‎ (In Persian)
Sharifzadegan, M. H., & Ghanouni, H. (2019). Analysis and Typology of Institutionalist Approach in Urban Planning. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 24(2), 5-18. (In Persian)
Sorensen, A. (2018). “New institutionalism and planning theory” In Gunder, M., Madanipour, A., & Watson, V. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of planning theory. London: Routledge, pp:250-263.
Stein, H. (2008), Beyond the World Bank Agenda – An Institutional Approach to Development, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Waugh Jr, W. L. (2004). The “all-hazards” approach must be continued. Journal of Emergency Management, 2(1), 11-12.
Taghaddosi, R., & Sharifzadegan, M. H. (2020). Investigating the Status of Participatory Urban Development Planning and its Challenges in the Institutionalist School of Thought. Urban Planning Knowledge, 4(4), 37-62. (In Persian)
Teitz, M.B. (2007). Planning and the New Institutionalisms, In Verma, N., & Tiesdell, S. (Eds.). Institutions and planning, Current Research in Urban and Regional Studies. Elsevier, pp: 17-35.
Veisi, F., Ahmadi, K. (2018). Comprehensive crisis management with a community-oriented and forward-looking approach, first edition, Tehran: Bazargani Publishing Company. (In Persian)
Verma, N. (2007). " Institutions and Planning: An Analogical Inquiry", In Verma, N., & Tiesdell, S. (Eds.). Institutions and planning (Vol. 2). Elsevier.
Verma, N., & Tiesdell, S. (Eds.). (2007). Institutions and planning, Current Research in Urban and Regional Studies. Elsevier.
Vitale, C., & Meijerink, S. (2021). Flood risk policies in Italy: a longitudinal institutional analysis of continuity and change. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 1-25.
Wegner, D.L. (2018).” Foreword”, In “Managing Flood Risk, Innovative Approaches from Big Floodplain Rivers and Urban Streams”, Anna Serra-Llobet, G. Mathias Kondolf, Kathleen Schaefer, Scott Nicholson
Webster, C. J. (2009). Are some planning transactions intrinsically sovereign? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(4), 476-490.
Serra-Llobet, A., Kondolf, G. M., Schaefer, K., & Nicholson, S. (Eds.). (2018). Managing flood risk: innovative approaches from big floodplain rivers and urban streams. Springer.
Willems, S., & Baumert, K. (2003). Institutional capacity and climate actions. Paris: OECD.
Zali, N., Molaei Hashjin, N., & Taghizadeh, S. (2022). Regional Planning Approach to Protect Surrounding Towns and Villages in the Event of Dam Break: Case Study of AchChay Dam (vol 52, pg 313, 2021). Natural Hazards Review, 23(1).
Zhang, T. (2006). Planning theory as an institutional innovation: Diverse approaches and nonlinear trajectory of the evolution of planning theory. City planning review, 30(8), 9-18.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of economic literature, 38(3), 595-613.
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 January 2023
  • Revise Date: 29 January 2023
  • Accept Date: 07 March 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics