Identifying the informal settlements’ physical development principles as a context-based pattern using the Meta-synthesis method

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidtae, Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: Deliberation of generated knowledge about informal settlements leads to the identification of two critical theoretical gaps. firstly, although contextualism has entered into urban planning discussions, its place as an independent theoretical framework for explaining the development process of informal settlements seems vacant. Secondly, the theoretical literature of urbanism lacks a comprehensive framework obtained by contextual analysis of the physical development pattern of these settlements.
Objectives: The study aims to analyze the context to explain the physical development of informal settlements using a contextualism perspective. In other words, this study attempts to formulate a coherent theoretical framework of the informal settlement’s physical development planning principles in a contextual interpretation.
Method: The study used the meta-synthesis method with Sandlosky and Barros seven-step model. Firstly, 422 articles were obtained through a systematic search. Finally, 27 articles were selected for inclusion through the screening process using rayyan.ai. Then the selected papers were inductively coded using MAXQDA 2020 based on the research questions, and the next steps were devoted to analyzing and synthesizing the concepts extracted.
Result: The extraction process led to the identification of 1092 codes. The combination process of the codes resulted in the designation of one lateral category; articles’ descriptive information, and five main categories; macro context, local context, the function of context, the response to the context, and interventionist factors. The next part of the outcomes were four sorts of principles related to the physical development of informal settlements includes; process, product, management, and regulations.
Conclusion: Firstly, informal settlements are a context-based phenomenon consequently, to understand the logic governing them, it is necessary to analyze the context at macro and local scales. Secondly, the development principles of informal settlements are evolving and upgrading cyclically, and continuously. Therefore, these settlements have the potential dynamics necessary to adapt incrementally to the changing needs and conditions and operate resilient, affordable, and sustainable.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References
Abedijafari, A., & Amiri, M. (2019). Meta-Synthesis as a Method for Synthesizing Qualitative Researches. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(99), 73-87. (in Persian)
Abubakar, A., Romice, O., & Salama, A. M. (2017). Defining slums using multidimensional and relational properties: A dynamic framework for intervention. Archnet-IJAR, 11(2), 34-54.
Aguirre, T. R., & Bolton, K. W. (2014). Qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis in social work research: Uncharted territory. Journal of Social Work, 14(3), 279-294.
Ahern, T., Byrne, P. J., & Leavy, B. (2016). Root Metaphors for the Management of Projects: Toward a Knowledge-Based View. Project Management Journal, 47(3), 109-123.
Alnaim, M. M. (2020). The Hierarchical Order of Spaces in Arab Traditional Towns: The Case of Najd, Saudi Arabia. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 08(03), 347-366.
Alnaim, M. M. (2022). Discovering the Integrative Spatial and Physical Order in Traditional Arab Towns: A Study of Five Traditional Najdi Settlements of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Architecture and Planning - King Saud University, 34(2), 223-238.
AlSayyad, N. (1993). Informal housing in a comparative perspective: On Squatting, Culture, and Development in a Latin American and a Middle Eastern Context. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 5(1), 3-18.
AlSayyad, N. (2004). Urban informality as a “new” way of life. In A. Roy & N. Alsayyad (Eds.), Urban Informality: Transnational Persectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia (pp. 7-30). Lexington Books.
Arefi, M. (2011). Order in informal settlements: A case study of Pinar, Istanbul. Built Environment, 37(1), 42-56.
Banihashemi, M. A. (2018). Evaluation of Infill Development in Urban Neighborhoods Using Contextual Approach to Increasing Interactions of Residents (Case Study: Danesh Alley, Tabriz City). Urban Planning Knowledge, 2(2), 79-93. (in Persian)
Ben-Hamouche, M. (2011). Fractal Geometrry in Muslim Cities: How Succession Law Shaped Morphology. Nexus Network Journal, 13(1), 235-251.
Birtchnell, T., Gill, N., & Sultana, R. (2019). Sleeper cells for urban green infrastructure: Harnessing latent competence in greening Dhaka’s slums. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 40(December 2017), 93-104.
Calogero, P. A. (2011). Planning Kabul: The politics of urbanization in Afghanistan (Unpublished PhD thesis, UC Berkelely).
Calogero, P. A., Day, J., & Dangol, N. (2019). How urban regimes produce and manage informality: Insights from three cases of informal housing. In A Research Agenda for Housing (pp. 84-97). Edward Elgar.
Cambridge. (2022). Context [Definaion]. Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/context
Campbell, L. (2018). Whats Missing? Adding context to the urban response toolbox. ALNAP STUDY.
Castells, M. (1979). The Urban Question, A Marxist Approach. In The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. MIT Press.
Chitengi, H. S. (2018). Regulations and housing informality in African cities: appropriating regulatory frameworks to factors that influence resilience. Housing and Society, 45(1), 14-41.
Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. In New Left Books (1th ed.). London, New York: VERSO.
De Soto, H. (1989). The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. HarperCollins.
Dener, A. (2012). The right to inhabit in the city: Yeni Sahra squatter settlement in Istanbul. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 9(1), 86-103.
Devlin, R. T. (2018). Asking ‘Third World questions’ of First World informality: Using Southern theory to parse needs from desires in an analysis of informal urbanism of the global North. Planning Theory, 17(4), 568-587.
Dovey, K. (2012). Informal urbanism and complex adaptive assemblage. International Development Planning Review, 34(4), 349-368.
Dovey, K., & King, R. (2011). Forms of informality: Morphology and visibility of informal settlements. Built Environment, 37(1), 11-29.
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 186-200.
Fadaei, A. (2018). Formal-informal nexus in academic debates. A literature review. Territorio, 84, 167-174.
Fallatah, A., Jones, S., Mitchell, D., & Kohli, D. (2019). Mapping informal settlement indicators using object-oriented analysis in the Middle East. International Journal of Digital Earth, 12(7).
Faludi, A. (1973). Planning Theory (1st ed.). United Kingdom: Pergamon Press.
Fitchett, A. (2014). Adaptive Co-management in the Context of Informal Settlements. Urban Forum, 25(3), 355-374.
Fox, E. J. (2006). Constructing a pragmatic science of learning and instruction with functional contextualism. Eeducational Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 5-36.
Fox, E. J. (2008). Contextualistic Perspectives. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 55-66). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goel, N. (2010). Squatter Settlements: the Urban Vernacular? I.P. Extn.; Patparganj, 106(Stokes 1962).
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
Gwaleba, M. J., & Chigbu, U. E. (2020). Participation in property formation: Insights from land-use planning in an informal urban settlement in Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 92(March 2019), 104482.
Hart, K. (1973). Informal Income Urban Ghana Opportunities and. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 11(1), 61-89.
Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939-941.
Hasgül, E. (2016). Incremental housing: A participation process solution for informal housing. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 13(1), 15-27.
Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: a review of Stephen C. Pepper's world hypotheses: A study in evidence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1(1), 97-111.
Jones, P. (2012). Searching for a little bit of utopia - understanding the growth of squatter and informal settlements in Pacific towns and cities. Australian Planner, 49(4), 327-338.
Jones, P. (2019). The shaping of form and structure in informal settlements: A case study of order and rules in lebak siliwangi, Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 30(1), 43-61.
Kamalipour, H. (2016). Forms of informality and adaptations in informal settlements. Archnet-IJAR, 10(3), 60-75.
Kellett, P. (2011). Contemporary Vernaculars: Informal housing processes and vernacular theory. International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements, 2(1), 2-12.
Kohli, D., Sliuzas, R., Kerle, N., & Stein, A. (2012). An ontology of slums for image-based classification. Computers environment and urban system, 36(2), 154-163.
Lejano, R. P., & Del Bianco, C. (2018). The logic of informality: Pattern and process in a São Paulo favela. Geoforum, 91(March), 195-205.
Lombard, M., & Huxley, M. (2011). Self-Made Cities: Ordinary Informality? Planning Theory & Practice, 12(1), 120-125.
Lueder, C. (2018). Urban villages and informal settlements as protagonists of urban futures oa. Urban Design International, 23(1), 4-21.
Mahabir, R., Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., & Agouris, P. (2016). The study of slums as social and physical constructs: Challenges and emerging research opportunities. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1).
Major, C. H., & Savin-Baden, M. (2010). An Introduction to Qualitative Research Synthesis (1st ed.). Routledge.
Marshall, S. (2009). Cities, Design, and Evolution. London: Routledge.
McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking Informality: Politics, Crisis, and the City. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(1), 89-108.
Mehrabi, Z. M. (2013). Empowerment experiences in Iran’s spontaneous. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(11), 1853-1861.
Mesgar, M., Ramirez-Lovering, D., & El-Sioufi, M. (2021). Tension, conflict, and negotiability of land for infrastructure retrofit practices in informal settlements. Land, 10(12).
Michelutti, E., & Smith, H. C. (2014). The realpolitik of informal city governance. The interplay of powers in Mumbai’s un-recognized settlements. Habitat International, 44, 367-374.
Mould, O. (2014). Tactical urbanism: The new vernacular of the creative city. Geography Compass, 8(8), 529-539.
Mukhija, V., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2015). Reading the Informal City: Why and How to Deepen Planners’ Understanding of Informality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(4), 444-454.
Nadeem, G. F. (2018). A review of the evolution of the concept of low-income housing in the theoretical literature of urban planning and urban management. Andishe: Scientific-Research Quarterly of Harat University, 18(2), 33-44. (in Persian)
NEJATI, N., Sarrafi, M., & Najafzadeh, R. (2021). Explanation of the Role of Power-knowledge in the Spatial Planning with Emphasis on Disciplinary Power and Bio-Power. Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(2), 133-151. (in Persian)
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1-10.
Oviedo, D., Okyere, S. A., Nieto, M., Kita, M., Kusi, L. F., Yusuf, Y., & Koroma, B. (2021). Walking off the beaten path: Everyday walking environment and practices in informal settlements in Freetown. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 40(June 2020).
Oxford. (2022). Context [Definition]. Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/academic/context?q=context
Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information and Management, 52(2), 183-199.
Patel, A., Koizumi, N., & Crooks, A. (2014). Measuring slum severity in Mumbai and Kolkata: A household-based approach. Habitat International, 41, 300-306.
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. University of California press.
Perold, R., Donaldson, R., & Devisch, O. (2019). Architecture in Southern African informal settlements: A contextually appropriate intervention. Urbani Izziv, 30, 96-111.
Pojani, D. (2019). The self-built city: theorizing urban design of informal settlements. Archnet-IJAR, 13(2), 294-313.
Quintana Vigiola, G. (2022). Informal housing and residents’ well-being in Caracas and Sydney: a comparative study of residents’ experiences. Global Discourse, 12(2), 289-308.
Rahman, M. (2011). Sustainable squatter housing in the developing world: Changing conceptualization. Archnet-IJAR, 5(1), 143-159.
Rapoport, A. (1988). Spontaneous Settlements as Vernacular Design. In C. V. Patton (Ed.), Spontaneous Shelter: International Perspectives and Prospects (pp. 51-77). Temple university press.
Rapoport, A. (1999). A Framework for studying vernacular design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 16(1), 52-64.
Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147-158.
Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76-87.
Roy, A. (2012). Urban informality, the production of space and practice of planning. In R. Crane & R. Weber (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning (pp. 691-705). Oxford University Press.
Saffar Sabzevar, F., Daneshvar, M., Hanaee, T., & Seyedolhosseini, S. M. (2020). Identification of the urban self-organization's dimensions and components using the meta-synthesis method. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(4), 53-71. (in Persian)
Samper, J. (2014). Toward an Epistemology of the Form of the Informal City: Mapping the Process of Informal City Making. Informal Settlement Research ISR, 1–21.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer.
Sibyan, I. A. (2020). Rethinking slum planning: A comparative study of slum upgrading projects. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 31(1), 1-11.
Slaev, A. D., Cozzolino, S., Nozharova, B., & Ilieva, J. (2022). The spontaneous rules of spontaneous development. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 0(0), 1-17.
Smit, S., Musango, J. K., Kovacic, Z., & Brent, A. C. (2017). Conceptualising slum in an urban African context. Cities, 62, 107-119.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(August), 333-339.
Soilemezi, D., & Linceviciute, S. (2018). Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Reflections and Lessons Learnt by Two New Reviewers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1-14.
Soliman, A. M. (2021). The Paradigm of Urban Informality: Laws, Norms, and Practices. In A. M. Soliman (Ed.), Urban Informality (pp. 121-156). Springer International Publishing.
Streule, M., Karaman, O., Sawyer, L., & Schmid, C. (2020). Popular Urbanization: Conceptualizing Urbanization Processes Beyond Informality. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(4), 652-672.
Tavallaei, N. (2001). Contexualism in Urban Planning. Memari-Va-Shahrsazi (Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba), 34(10), 34-63. (in Persian)
Tsenkova, S. (2010). Informal settlements in post-communist cities: Diversity factors and patterns. Urbani Izziv, 21(2), 73-84.
Uddin, N. (2018). Assessing urban sustainability of slum settlements in Bangladesh: Evidence from Chittagong city. Journal of Urban Management, 7(1), 32-42.
UN-Habitat. (2004). Urban Indicators Guidelines – UN-Habitat (Issue August).
Venerandi, A., Iovene, M., & Fusco, G. (2021). Exploring the similarities between informal and medieval settlements: A methodology and an application. Cities, 115(May), 103211.
Verniz, D., & Duarte, J. P. (2021). Santa Marta Urban Grammar: Unraveling the spontaneous occupation of Brazilian informal settlements. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(4), 810-827.
Vuksanović-Macura, Z., & Miščević, I. (2021). Excluded communities and participatory land-use planning: experience from informal Roma settlements in Serbia. Environment and Urbanization, 33(2), 456-477.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 August 2022
  • Revise Date: 30 March 2023
  • Accept Date: 26 May 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics