Identifying and Analyzing the Main Strands of Research on the subject of Ethics in Urban Planning: A Systematic Review of Literature with Thematic Analysis

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art., Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Ethics is related to choice and practical judgment. Since the nature of urban planning is related to the pursuit of community interests through determining appropriate actions for the future during successive choices in complex settings and uncertain conditions, it can be said that ethical considerations are an inseparable part of it and it is inevitable to integrate the philosophy of ethics with the thoughts and professional efforts of planning. In general, addressing the ethical questions of "do's and don'ts" and examining "the nature and meaning of moral values" in planning is always urgent and necessary but challenges raised in the contemporary era, the emphasis of new theoretical positions on attention to contextual differences and conflicts in perceptions and interpretations of values and ethical principles of planning, and ultimately the dispersion and reduction of attention to the area of planning ethics in the recent decades, the necessity of reviewing and rethinking the content of research published in this area has become more prominent. The current research aims to present a comprehensive view of ethics in planning by identifying dominant themes in the literature, specifying existing research gaps, and of course introducing new paths to complete the various dimensions of planning ethics. With answering to the questions like: what are the main priorities of researchers regarding ethics in urban planning? Which subjects and issues have been neglected in the existing researches and what perspectives can be suggested for future researches in this area? This research provides a general view of ethics in planning and its changes over time.
Methodology: This research is a systematic investigation of a specific subject to improve or expand knowledge, it is considered basic research that has been conducted with a qualitative approach (thematic analysis).
Table 1. Methodological design in this research




General stages


Descriptions


Outputs




Review strategy


Explaining the qualitative systematic review using thematic analysis


The review plan




Data collection


Identifying key concepts and searching for primary sources


Finding 224 sources as articles, dissertations, book chapters
110 researches enter the analysis stage as a final data set.




Refinement and selection of the most relevant studies




Analyzing and
synthesizing the
dataset


Descriptive analysis of research


Temporal and geographical distribution and researches focus area




Content analysis in five steps: Reading the full text of documents in the dataset; Selecting textual codes; Extracting basic themes; Synthesizing the basic themes and creating organizing themes; Grouping the organizing themes and generating the global themes.


identifying three global themes: integration of ethical theories with planning theory, ethics in the realm of professional practice, and ethical considerations in the Academic realm.
introducing potential paths for future research.




Results: By analyzing the final data set, we have identified three global themes: integration of ethical theories with planning theory, ethics in the realm of professional practice, and ethical considerations in the academic realm.
Research under the First global theme, integrating ethical theories with planning theory is qualitative and discusses the nature and role of planning based on ethical philosophy. With an extroverted approach, these works focus on normative ethical theories and seek to explain the most basic criteria of rightness and wrongness and do and don'ts in planning. Second global them, ethics in the realm of professional practice is focused on the ethical dimensions and aspects of the planning practice including Ethical attitudes of planners, the complexities of decision-making and ethical judgment in the planning process, ethics in planning techniques, and the direct application of ethical theories in practice. Research under the third global theme, ethics, and ethical considerations in the academic realm of planning is focused on teaching ethics in planning and ethics in planning research.
Discussion: According to the investigations of the present research, the research focused on ethics in planning has been scattered and separated over time and their balance has decreased in different layers (Figure 5). In the 1990s, most of the themes receivedthe attention of researchers, but since the beginning of the 21st century, we have seen a decline in direct attention to this research field at various levels. Of course, a series of themes such as extracting the values of planners, investigating the nature and content of professional codes, and teaching ethics in planning have always been welcomed by researchers. The continuation of attention to these themes shows things like learning from action, determining ethical frameworks through a bottom-up process, and extracting the inner values of planning have always been emphasized by researchers. . Also, the flow of research in the last two decades shows that the context of planning and the importance and impact of contextual differences in the selection, interpretation, and teaching of ethical concepts and ideas have become more prominent.
Conclusion: A general review of the planning ethics literature shows that the concerns related to the ethics and values of planning are largely dominated by normative concerns. The researchers of this field, instead of exploring more deeply the "nature and meaning of ethical values and principles" (meta-ethical field) and how to identify the appropriate solution in each specific situation, focus on the normative Deontological frameworks derived from Western contexts, which put forth universal normative principles and procedures without considering the impact of context and culture on knowledge and behavior.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References

Alexander, E. (2013). Values in Planning and Design: A Process Perspective on Ethics in Forming the Built Environment. In C. Basta & S. Moroni (Eds.), Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment (pp. 3-22). Springer.
Akther, S., & Islam, I. (2020). Ethics and Professionalism in Planning Practice: An Experience from Dhaka. In R. Thakur, A. Dutt, S. Thakur & G. Pomeroy, Urban and Regional Planning and Development: 20th Century Forms and 21st Century Transformations (pp. 389-403). Springer Nature.
Anderson, C. W. (1985). The Place of Principles in Policy Analysis. In M. Wachs (Ed.), Ethics in planning (pp. 193-215). ew Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
Ansaloni, F., & Tedeschi, M. (2015). Ethics and spatial justice:Unfolding non-linear possibilities for planning action. Planning Theory, 15(3), 316-332.
Attili, G. (2009). Ethical Awareness in Advocacy Planning Research. In F. Lo Piccolo & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and Planning Research (pp. 207-218). Farnham: Ashgate.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405.
Banville, M. S., & Torres, J. (2016). On embracing an immanent ethics in urban planning: Pursuing our Body-without-Organs. Planning Theory, 16(3), 255-274.
Beatley, T. (1984). Applying moral principles to growth management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50, 459-469.
Beatley, T. (1989). Environmental ethics and planning theory. Journal of Planning Literature, 4, 1-32.
Beatley, T. (1994). Environmental ethics and the field of planning: Alternative theories and middle-range principles. In H. Thomas (Ed.), Values and Planning (pp. 12-37). Ashgate Publishing.
Beatley, T. (1994). Ethical land use: principles of policy and planning. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Beatley, T. (1995). Teaching Environmental Philosophy to Graduate Planning Students. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning Ethics: A Reader in Planning Theory, Practice, and Education. Center for Urban Policy Research.
Berry, D., & Steiker, G. (1974). The Concept of Justice in Regional Planning: Justice as Fairness. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 40(6), 414-421.
Blanco, H. (1995). Community and the four jewels of planning. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning Ethics: Readings in Planning Theory,Practice and Education (pp. 66-82). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
Blatt, A. J. (2012). Ethics and Privacy Issues in the Use of GIS. Journal of Map And Geography Libraries, 8, 80-84.
Bolan, R. S. (1983). The Structure of Ethical Choice In Planning Practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research , 3(1), 23-34 .
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4).
Campbell, H. (2006). Just Planning: The Art of Situated Ethical Judgment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(92), 92-106.
Campbell, H. (2012). Planning ethics and rediscovering the idea of planning. Planning Theory, 11(4), 379-399.
Campbell, H., & Marshal, R. (1998). Acting on Principle: Dilemmas in Planning Practice. Planning Practice and Research, 13(2), 117-128.
Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (1999). Ethical Frameworks and Planning Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(3), 464–478.
Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2000). Moral Obligations, Planning, and the Public Interest: A Commentary on Current British Practice. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 27(2), 297-312 .
Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002). Values and professional identities in planning practice. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning Futures. New Directions for Planning Theory (pp. 93–109). London: Routledge.
Chan, J. (2016). The ethics of working with wicked urban waste problems: The case ofSingapore’s Semakau Landfill. Landscape and Urban Planning, 154, 123-131.
Chan, J. (2022). Urban planning ethics: Teaching a practice of hope. In R. Jacobs, Educating in ethics across the professions: A compendium of research, theory, practice, and an agenda for the future (pp. 93-114). Age Publishing Inc.
Chang, V. (2021). An ethical framework for big data and smart cities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 165(5).
Cook, A., & Sarkissian, W. (2000). Who Cares?Australian Planners and Ethics. In P. Bishop, Local Government, Public Enterprise and Ethics. Federation Press.
Cussen, K. (2000). ‘Is’ or ‘Ought’ in Planning? Australian Planner, 37(3), 130-132.
Driver, J. (2007). Ethics: The Fundamentals. Blackwell.
Escuin-Rubio, M. (1994). Planners’ ethics, attitudes, and roles: A longitudinal study. University of Wisconsin-Madison in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Esnard, A. M. (1998). Cities, GIS, and Ethics. Journal of Urban Technology, 5(3), 33-45.
Faludi, A. (1989). Procedural rationality and ethical theory. Planning Outlook, 32(1), 55-65.
Faramarz Ghramaleki, A., Derakhshani, L., & Rezaei Sharifabadi, S. (2011). Professional ethics in library and information science. Tehran: samt. (in Persian)
Fischer, F. (1983). Ethical Discourse in Public Administration (M. Wachs, Ed.). Administration & Society, 15(5), 5-42.
Forester , J., & Laws, D. (2009). Toward a Naturalistic Research Ethic: Or how Mediators must Act Well to Learn, if They are to Practice Effectively. In F. Piccolo  & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and Planning Research (pp. 179-190). Farnham: Ashgate.
Forester, J. (1980). Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46, 275-286.
Forester, J. (1994). Political judgement and learning about value in transportation planning: Bridging Habermas and Aristotle. In H. Thomas (Ed.), Values and Planning (pp. 178-204). Ashgate Publishing.
Forester, J. (1999). On the Ethics of Planning: What Profiles of Planners Can Teach Us About Practical Judgment and Moral Improvisation. In J. Forester (Ed.), Multi-Party Dispute Resolution, Democracy and Decision-Making, Volume 2 (pp. 221-241). London: MIT Press.
Frankena, W. K. (1997). Ethics (H. Sadegi, Trans.). Qom: Cultural Institution of Taha. (in Persian)
Galloway, T., & Edwards , T. (1982). Critically Examining the Assumptions of Espoused Theory The Case of City Planning and Management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(2), 184-195.
Goonewardena, K. (2009). Planning Research, Ethical Conduct and Radical Politics. In F. Lo Piccolo & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and Planning Research (pp. 57-70). Farnham: Ashgate.
Gowdy, A., & Hendler, S. (1999). Environmental values and professionalism in planning: a case study. Plan Canada, 39(2), 28-32.
Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
Gupta, S., & Sharma, A. (2022). Evolution of infrastructure as an asset class: a systematic literature review and thematic analysis. Journal of Asset Management, 23, 173-200.
Hanafizadeh, P., & Harati Nik, M. (2020). Configuration of Data Monetization: A Review of Literature with Thematic Analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(1), 17-34.
Harper, T., & Stein, S. (1992). The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 11, 105-116.
Harper, T., & Stein, S. (1993). Normative ethical theory: is it relevant to contemporary planning practice? Plan Canada, 6-12.
Harper, T., & Stein , S. (1995). A Classical Liberal (Libertarian) Approach to Planning Theory. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning ethics: a reader in planning theory, practice, and education (pp. 11-29). Center for Urban Policy Research.
Harper, T., & Stein , S. (1995). Contemporary Procedural Ethical Theory and Planning Theory​. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning ethics : a reader in planning theory, practice, and education (pp. 49-65). New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
Hassan poor, J., & Dehyadegari, M. (2009). Morality and Politics from Critical Theory Point of View. journal of political and international scientific and research quarterly , 1(2), 107-138. (in Persian)
Healey, P. (2009). Researching Planning Practice. In F. Lo Piccolo & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and Planning Research (pp. 161-175). Farnham: Ashgate.
Hendler, S. (1991). Ethics in Planning:The Views of Students and Practitioners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 10(2), 99-106.
Hendler, S. (1994). Feminist planning ethics. Journal of Planning Literature, 9(2), 115–127.
Hendler, S. (1996). On the Use of Models in Planning Ethics. In S. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza & R. Burchell (Eds.), Explorations in planning theory (pp. 400-413). Center for Urban Policy Research.
Hendler, S. (2001). Planning ethics. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 11474–11479). Philadelphia: PA: Elsevier.
Hendler, S. (2005). Towards a Feminist Code of Planning Ethics. Planning Theory & Practice, 6(1), 53-69.
Hoch, C. (1995). Teaching Ethics and Planning Theory. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning Ethics: a reader in planning thcory, practice and cducation (pp. 281-300). New Brunswck: Centre for Urban Policy Research. Rutgers University.
Hoekveld, G., & Needham, B. (2013). Planning Practice between Ethics and the Power Game: Making and Applying an Ethical Code for Planning Agencies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5).
Hosmer, L. (1998). The ethics of management (M. Arabi, & D. Izadi, Trans.) Tehran: iran cultural studies. (in Persian)
Howe, E., & Kaufman, J. (1979). The Ethics of Contemporary American Planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(3), 243-255.
Howe, E. (1980). Role Choices of Urban Planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(4), 398-409.
Howe, E., & Kaufman, J. (1980). Ethics and Professional Practice in Planning and Related Policy Professions. Policy Studies Journal, 9(4), 585–595.
Howe, E. (1990). Normative Ethics in Planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 5(2), 123-150 .
Howe, E., & Kaufman, J. (1981). The Values of Contemporary American Planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47(3), 266-278.
Imrie, R. (2009). The Knowledge Business in Academic Planning Research. In F. Lo Piccolo & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and Planning Research (pp. 71-90). Farnham: Ashgate.
Jacobs, H. (1995). Contemporary environmental philosophy and its challenge to planning theory. In S. Hendler (ed.), Planning Ethics: A Reader in Planning theory, Practice, and Education. New Brunswick New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research
Jacobs, H. (1995). Ethics in Environmental Planning Practice: The Case of Agricultural Land Protection. In S. Hendler (Ed.), A Reader in Planning Theory, Practice, and Education (pp. 154-173). New Brunswick,New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research.
Johnson, B., Peck , M., & Prest, S. (2017). City Managers Have Ethics Too? Comparing Planning and City Management Codes of Ethics. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), 183-201.
Kaufman, J. (1981). Teaching Planning Ethics. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1(1), 29-35.
Kaufman, J. (1985). American and Israeli Planners: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of the American Planning Association, 51(3), 352-363.
Kaufman, J. (1985). Land Planning in an Ethical Perspective. In M. Wachs (Ed.), Ethics in planning (pp. 291-298). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Kaufman, J. (1987). Teaching Planning Students About Strategizing, Boundary Spanning and Ethics: Part of the New Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 6(2), 108-115.
Kaufman, J. (1993). Reflections on Teaching Three Versions of a Planning Ethics Course. Journal ofplanning Education and Research, 12, 107-115.
Kelman, S. (1985). Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental, Safety, and Health Regulation: Ethical and Philosophical Considerations. In M. Wachs (Ed.), Ethics in planning (pp. 233-246). New Brunswick, N.J. : Center for Urban Policy Research.
Khakee, A., & Dahlgren, L. (1990). Ethics and values of Swedish planners: A replication and comparison with an American study. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 7(2), 65-81.
Kilinç, G., Özgür , H., & Neval, G. (2012). The Possible Sources of Ethical Issues in Urban/Physical Planning in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 13(1), 45-65.
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. SAGE.
Kitchen, R. (2016). The Ethics of Smart Cities and Urban Science. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 374, 1-15.
Klosterman, R. (1978). Foundations for normative planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 44(1), 37-46.
Klosterman, R. (1985). Arguments for and against Planning. The Town Planning Review, 56(1), 5-20.
Koller, S. (2013). Architects on Value: Reducing Ethics to Aesthetics? In C. Basta, & S. Moroni (Eds.), Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment (pp. 57-78). Springer.
Krumholz, N., & Forester, J. (1990). Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Kuczynski, T., & Kuczynska, A. (2007). Teaching Ethics for Urban Planners and Architects. Coimbra, Portugal: International Conference on Engineering Education – ICEE 2007.
Lang, R. (1995). An Equity-Based Approach to Waste Management Facility Siting. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning ethics: a reader in planning theory, practice, and education (pp. 174-194). Center for Urban Policy Research.
Lang, R., & Hendler, S. (1990). Environmental Ethics: Ethics and professional planners. In D. MacNiven (Ed.), Moral Expertise: Studies in Practical and Professional Ethics. Routledge.
Lauria, M., & Long, M. (2017). Planning Experience and Planners’ Ethics. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), 202-220.
Lauria, M., & Long, M. (2019). Ethical Dilemmas in Professional Planning Practice in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), 393-404.
Lein, J. (2003). Ethics, Conflict, and Environmental Planning. In J. K. Lein (Ed.), Integrated Environmental Planning (pp. 184-197). Blackwell Publishing.
Lennon, M., & Fox-Rogers, L. (2017). Morality, Power and the Planning Subject. Planning Theory, 16(4), 364-383.
Lieto, L. (2009). Knowledge, Power and Ethics in Extraordinary Times: Learning from the Naples Waste Crisis. In F. Lo Piccolo & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and Planning Research (pp. 191-206). Farnham: Ashgate.
Lo Piccolo, F. (2009). Multiple Roles in Multiple Dramas: Ethical Challenges in Undertaking Participatory Planning Research. In F. Lo Piccolo & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and Planning Research (pp. 233-254). Farnham: Ashgate.
Lo Piccolo, F., & Thomas, H. (2008). Research Ethics in Planning: a Framework for Discussion. Planning Theory, 7(1), 7-23.
Lo Piccolo, F., & Todaro, V. (2021). Landscape of exception: Power inequalities and ethical planning challenges in the landscape transformation of south-eastern Sicily. Planning Theory, 21(1), 1-27.
Low, N. (1994 ). Planning and justice. In H. Thomas (Ed.), Values and Planning. Ashgate Publishing.
Lucy, W. (1988). APA's Ethical Principles Include Simplistic Planning Theories . Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(2), 147-149.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality. NotreDame: Indiana University of Notre Dame Press.
Malekpourasl, B., & Dastvareh, F. (2020). Professional Ethics Codes in Planning. Sustainable development of geographical environment, 2(2), 184-199. (in Persian)
Marcuse , P. (1976). Professional Ethics and Beyond: Values in Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 42(3), 264-274.
Marker Feld, M. (1995). Education Planning: Ethical Dilemmas Arising in Public Policy Decision Making. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning ethics: a reader in planning theory, practice, and education (pp. 221-243). the Center for Urban Policy Research, The State University of New Jersey.
Marlin, R. (1995). Rawlsian Justice and Community Planning. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning ethics : a reader in planning theory, practice, and education (pp. 141-153). Center for Urban Policy Research.
Martens, K. (2012). Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: applying Walzer’s ‘Spheres of Justice’ to the transport sector. Transportation, 39(6), pages1035–1053.
McClymont, K. (2018). Articulating virtue: Planning ethics within and beyond post politics. Planning Theory, 18(3), 282-299.
McConnell, S. (1995). Rawlsian Planning Theory . In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning ethics : a reader in planning theory, practice, and education (pp. 30-48). New Brunswick, N.J. : Center for Urban Policy Research .
Mehdizadeh, J. (2006). Urban development Strategic Planning (The recent experiences of World and Its position in Iran) (2 ed.). Tehran: Tarh va Nashre Payam Sima. (in Persian)
Mesbah Yazdi , M. (2003). The Philosophy of Ethics. Tehran: Nashre Beynolmelal. (in Persian)
Mohamed, A. (2016). Ethics in Town and Country Planning Education in India: Environments and Contexts. In A. Kumar, D. Meshram, & K. Gowda (Eds.), Urban and Regional Planning Education: Learning for India (pp. 203-210). Springer.
Palmer, M. (2009). Moral Problems: A Coursebook for Schools and Colleges. (A. Alebouyeh, Trans.) Qom: Samt. (in Persian)
Partovi, P. (2000). Ethical considerations in architecture and urban planning: Part I - Ethical worldview from Aristotle to Nietzsche. Honarnameh, 8, 133-137. (in Persian)
Partovi, P. (2001). Ethical considerations in architecture and urban planning: Part I - planning and ethical principles. Honarnameh, 9, 129-135. (in Persian)
Partovi, P. (2001). Ethical considerations in architecture and urban planning: Part III - Environmental ethics and sustainable development. Honarnameh, 12, 123-133. (in Persian)
Perkins, T., & Crews, J. (2013). The ethical dilemmas of local government planners in Western. In State of Australian Cities Conference .
Pinto, M. P. (2020). Environmental ethics in the perception of urban planners: A case study of four city councils. Urban Studies, 57(4), 1-18.
Ploger, J. (2004). Ethics in Norwegian planning: legitimacy, ambivalence,rhetoric,. Planning Practice & Research, 19(1), 49-66.
Prakash, P. (2016). Ethics and Planning Education in India. In A. Kumar, D. Meshram, & K. Gowda (Eds.), Urban and Regional Planning Education (pp. 181-192). Springer Singapore.
Richmond, J. (1990). Introducing philosophical theories to urban transportation planning or why all planners should practice bursting bubbles. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 7(1), 47–56 .
Ritzdorf, M. (1995). Feminist contributions to ethics and planning theory. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning Ethics. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research.
Ryan, M., & Gregory, A. (2019). Ethics of Using Smart City AI and Big Data: The Case of Four Large European Cities. ORBIT Journal, 2(2).
Safari, H., Zamani , B., & Rabbani, A. (2021). Analysis of Dimensions and Factors Affecting the Process of Formulating Professional Ethics Guidelines for Urban Planning in Iran. Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 31(4), 43-70. (in Persian)
Sarrafi , ‪., Tavakolinia, ‪., & Chmani Moghaddam, M. (2014). Planners’ Position in the Iranian Urban Planning Process. Motaleate Shahri, 3(12), 19-32. (in Persian)
Schilleci, F. (2009). Environmental Planning Research: Ethical Perspectives in Institutional and Value-Driven Approaches. In F. Lo Piccolo, & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and Planning Research (pp. 119-144). Farnham: Ashgate.
Silva, C. N. (2005). Urban Planning and Ethics. In J. Rabin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy (3 ed., pp. 311–316). New York: Marcel Dekker–Taylor & Francis.
Silva, C. N. (2015). Planning Ethics. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2 ed., Vol. 18, pp. 193-197). Elsevier.
Singer, P. (1996). A general approach to moral philosophy. marifat, 47-50. (in Persian)
Smith, N. (1985). Some characteristics of moral problems in evaluation practice. Evaluation and Program Planning,, 8, 5-11.
Soheili, H., Faghihipour, J., & Mahdavi Nasab, H. (2017). Professional Ethics(Concepts,Definitions and Applications). Tehran: Darolfonoon. (in Persian)
Stein, S. M., & Harper, T. L. (2005). Rawls’s ‘Justice as Fairness’: A Moral Basis for Contemporary Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 4(2), 147-172.
Sullivan, L. (2009). The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Tarhani , H., & Partovi , P. (2018). Realisation Mechanisms for the Public Interest in Successful Urban Development Plans, with An Emphasis on Planning Theories of the Second Half of the 20th Century. Soffeh, 28(3), 91-112. (in Persian)
Taylor, N. (1992). Professional ethics in town planning,What is a code of professional conduct for? TPR,63 (3) 1992, 63(3), 227-241.
Taylor, N. (1998). Urban Planning Theory since 1945 (1 ed.). SAGE.
Taylor, N. (2009). consequentialism and the Ethics of Planning Research. In F. Lo Piccolo , & H. Thomas (Eds.), Ethics and planning research (pp. 13-28). Farnham: Ashgate.
Thacher, D. (2004). The Casuistical Turn in Planning Ethics Lessons from Law and Medicine. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 269-285.
Thomas, H. (2009). Virtue Ethics and Research Ethics. In F. Lo Piccolo , & H. Thomas (Eds.), () Ethics and Planning Research. (pp. 29-40). Farnham: Ashgate.
Throgmorton, J. A. (1995). Ethics, Passion, Reason, and Power: The Rhetorics of Electric Power Planning in Chicago. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning ethics: a reader in planning theory, practice, and education (pp. 195-220). Center for Urban Policy Research.
Upton, R. (2002). Planning praxis : Ethics, values and theory. TPR, 73(3), 253-269.
Wachs, M. (1982). Ethical Dilemmas in Forecasting for Public Policy. Public Administration Review, 42(6), 562-567.
Wachs, . M. (1985). Ethics in Planning. New Brunswick,. New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
Wachs, M. (1995). Foreword. In S. Hendler (Ed.), Planning Ethics: A Reader in Planning Theory, Practice and Education (pp. xiii-xv). New Brunswick, NJ: Centre for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Wachs, M. (2015). The Past, Present, and Future of Professional Ethics in Planning. In S. Fainstein, & J. DeFilippis (Eds.), Readings in Planning Theory (4th ed., pp. 101-119). Wiley-Blackwell.
Watson, V. (2002). The Usefulness of Normative Planning Theories in the Context of Sub-Saharan Africa. Planning Theory, 27-52.
Watson, V. (2003). Conflicting rationalities: implications for planning theory and ethics. Planning Theory & Practice, 395-407.
Watson, V. (2006). Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory, 31-50.
Winkler, T., & Duminy, J. (2016). Planning to change the world? Questioning the normative ethics of planning theories. Planning Theory, 15(2), 111-129.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 December 2022
  • Revise Date: 14 April 2023
  • Accept Date: 30 May 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics