imagination of the scenario based on the alternative futures of the city of Tehran using the method of "four general alternative futures"

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Governance Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Futures Studies, Faculty of Governance, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22124/upk.2024.27153.1936

Abstract

Introduction: It is very difficult to think and make decisions about the future of the city as a combination of complex and uncertain systems. This complexity increases significantly when it comes to the long-term future of urban environments. Such challenges highlight the necessity of future-thinking and alternative thinking in the process of urban management and planning and show the need for a deeper understanding of alternative futures for the effective management of urban environments. The aim of this article is to identify and explain the alternative futures of Tehran; for this purpose, we have tried to study alternative future images of Tehran in an archetypal form of "growth, collapse, disciplined society and transformed society" using "Dator’s Four Generic Alternative Futures" method.
Methodology: This study employs the "Four Generic Alternative Futures" method to identify and elaborate on alternative futures for the city of Tehran. This method involves developing scenarios based on the identification of key trends and drivers impacting future of Tehran. The developed scenarios include "Capital Business Center", "Crossing the fate of Ray", "Tehran Family" and "Tehran investigators ". Each scenario has a unique narrative that outlines a distinct vision for the city's future
Results: Among the 87 trends and factors identified in the research process, 14 factors were selected by experts as the key variables of the future scenarios of Tehran city. In the meantime, citizens' trust in governing institutions will have the greatest impact on the future governance of Tehran. Each of the four scenarios, depending on its specific context, shows different states of key trends and reveals the consequences of realizing the desired future.
Discussion: The use of future-oriented approaches by managers and urban planners in the era of rapid changes, with growing complexity and increasing uncertainty, can lead to the achievement of coherent, comprehensive and integrated decision-making systems. These systems focus on greater stakeholder participation and sustainability of solutions. At the same time, future-oriented approaches can provide a suitable field for management and collaborative planning. The collaborative process of future research increases the possibility of successful implementation of these solutions by helping to develop successful solutions and the sense of ownership of the citizens towards the proposed solutions. Also, using these approaches through facilitating communication between key stakeholders and networking of knowledge resources increases the possibility of achieving preferred perspectives related to urban futures.
It is reminded that many futurists try to build a vision of the future by challenging the official futures and common trends, as well as identifying and promoting some normative issues by using normative approaches. The focus of normative approaches on predetermined values ​​has caused many examples of preferred futures to be created without paying enough attention to alternative futures. This inadequacy of the normative approaches has caused the Manawa school to use the method of "four general alternative futures" as a precursor to the development of preferred futures. Based on this approach, the current research has tried to develop diverse images in the form of four relevant scenarios, without falling into the trap of uncalculated idealism, each of which can be a basis for forward-looking design, policy making, and strategizing.
Conclusion: This research emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamics of the contemporary world and the double complexities of metropolitan areas. By considering different scenarios and adopting a holistic approach, we can hope for better and more effective governance and overcome the complexities of development. The use of scenario-based approaches by urban managers and planners in metropolises such as Tehran facilitates facing complexities and makes it more possible to achieve good governance. Achieving the images of the future of Tehran city, while identifying the most important challenges and opportunities hidden in alternative futures, provides a basis for policy making in the field of urban governance and optimal administration of Tehran city. This forward-looking approach is essential to address the multifaceted issues facing cities with changing landscapes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adl, Sh., Ourcad, B., Sarvghad Moghadam, A., Sidi, A., & Vosoughi, F. (1996). Tehran, a two-hundred-year-old capital. Tehran: Engineering and Technical Consulting Organization of Tehran Municipality & French Institute of Iranian Studies. . (in Persian)
Akhundi, A. A., Borkpour, N., Asadi, I., Basirat, M., & Taherkhani, H. (2008). Pathology of the urban management model in Iran. Geographical Research, (63), 135-156. (in Persian)
Amin nayeri, B., Zali, N., & Motavaf, S. (2019). Identification of regional development drivers by scenario Planning. International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability, 1(2), 67-80. doi: 10.22034/IJUMES.2017.06.15.016. . (in Persian)
Banister, D, and R Hickman. 2013 "Transportfutures:thinkingtheunthinkable." Transport Policy 29: 283–293.
Bell, w. 2003. Foundations of Futures Studies: History, Purposes and Knowledge, vol. 1. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
Bishop, A, and A Hinze. 2006. Thinking About the Future. Washington: Social Technologies, .
Borkpour, N. (2002). Transition from urban government to urban governance in Iran (Doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran. . (in Persian)
Borkpour, N., & Asadi, I. (2011). Urban management and governance. Tehran: University of Art. . (in Persian)
Borkpour, N., & Motahari, M. (2018). A comparison of the mayoral selection methods in Iran and seven European countries. Urban Management Studies Quarterly, 10(34), 61-75. . (in Persian)
cameron, laura, and cathrine potvin . 2016. Characterizing desired futures o fCanadian communities.” futures82 :37-51.
Comprehensive Plan of Tehran City. (2012). Tehran City Studies and Planning Center. (in Persian)
Daffara, P. (2011). Rethinking tomorrow’s cities: Emerging issues on city foresight.futures, 43, 680–689.
Dator, Jim. 1996. "Futures Studies in Applied Knowledge." In New Thinking for a New Millennium, by Richard Slaughter, 105-115. London: Routledge.
Dator, Jim. 2002. "Introduction: the Future Lies Behind." In In Advancing Futures: FuturesStudies in Higher Education,, by Jim Dator, 1-30. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
Dator, jim. 2009. "Alternative Futures at the Manoa School." Journal of Futures Studies 14 (2): 1-18.
Hicks, David, and Cathie Holden. 2007. "Remembering the Future: What Do ChildrenThink?" ” Environmental Education Research, 13 (4): 501-521.
Inayatullah, Sohail. 2009. "Questioning Scenarios." Journal of Futures Studies 13 (3): 75-80.
Inayatullah, Sohail. 2011. " City futures in transformation: Emerging issues and case studies."Futures ,43: 654-661.
Marzban, E., Rezayan, A., & rezayan, A. H. (2023). The Futures of the Faculty Promotion Regulations in Iran: a scenario approach. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 29(1), 207-233. doi: 10.61838/irphe.29.1.9. (in Persian)
Mohammadzadeh, A., Pourezzat, A., Rezayan Ghayehbashi, A., & Pirannejad, A. (2020). Imaginary of Citizen           Participation with the Aim of Improving Urban Governance (Case Study: Tehran). Urban Planning Knowledge, 4(4),        117-135. doi: 10.22124/upk.2020.16986.1507. (in Persian)     
Moriarty, Patrick, and honnery Damon. 2015. "Future cities in a warming world." futures 66: 43-52.
Mortezavi, M. (2013). Local management and urban governance. Tehran: Tehran City Studies and Planning Center.      (in Persian)
Ortegon-Sanchez, Adriana and Nick Tyler.2016. Constructing a Vision for an ‘Ideal’ Future City:a conceptual model for Transformative Urban Planning. Transportation Research Procedia 13: 6 –17
Polak, F. 1973. The Image of the Future. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing.
Priester, Roland, Montserrat Miramontes, and Gebhard Wulfhorst. 2014. "A generic code of urban mobility: how can cities drive future." Transportation Research Procedia 4: 90 – 102.
Rahmani, A., Nazari, V., & Shirkhani, M. (2015). Examination of the direct mayoral selection model in Europe and America and evaluation of its implementation in Iran. International Conference on New Achievements in Civil Engineering, Architecture, Environment, and Urban Management.
Ratcliffe, J, and L Sirr. 2003. "The prospective process through scenario thinking for the built and human environment: a tool for exploring urban futures." Futures Academy.
Ratcliffe, john, and ela crawczyk. 2011. "Imagineering city futures: The use of prospective through scenarios." futures 642-653.
Rezayan Ghayehbashi A, Marzban E. (2020) Identification of driving forces, uncertainties and future scenarios of Iran's environment. ijhe; 12 (4) :531-554. (in Persian)
Saritas, Ozcan, and Jack E. Smith. 2011. "The Big Picture – trends, drivers, wild cards, discontinuities and." Futures 43: 292–312.
Son, Hyeonju. 2012. "THE FUTURE OF SOUTH KOREA: ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS FOR 2030." UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘ 17.
Son, Hyeonju. 2013. " Alternative future scenarios for South Korea in 2030." futures 52: 27-41
Taghvai, A., & Tajdar, R. (2009). An introduction to good urban governance: An analytical approach. Urban Management Biannual Journal, 7(23), 45-58.(in Persian)
Wuellner, Cynthia Frewen. 2011. "Beyond economic and value wars: Mythic images of future cities." futures 43: 662-672.
Zali, N., & Sarmast, B. (2010). The Spatial Layout of the Urban Networks and Demographic Planning in the 2022 Prospective, the Case of Azerbaijan. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 13(48), 59-89. (in Persian)
Zali,N, & Zamanuipour, M.(2016)Preseting and Implementing a new model for scenario building in regional plannings. Case study: Mazandaran Province. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 6(18),1-23.SID. (in Persian)
Urban Planning Knowledge
Volume 8, Issue 1
March 2024
Pages 110-129

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 April 2024
  • Revise Date: 04 May 2024
  • Accept Date: 01 June 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics