شناسایی تعارض منافع ساکنین و گردشگران در مسیرهای گردشگری بافت‌های تاریخی (نمونه موردی: گذر صدر تبریز)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار و عضو هئیت علمی گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد مرمت و احیای بناها و بافتهای تاریخی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد طراحی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

4 کارشناسی شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

10.22124/upk.2025.27260.1943

چکیده

بیان مسئله: رهاشدگی، افول پویایی و افت حیات در بافت‌های شهری- تاریخی و مسکونی از مسائلی هستند که همواره حضور گردشگران شهری به عنوان راه‌حلی برای رفع آنها یاد می‌شود. اهداف، اولویت‌ها و خواسته‌های متفاوت میان دو قشر ساکنین و گردشگران و بروز مشکلات و وجود مزایای متفاوت برای هر یک از طرفین، می‌تواند منجر به بروز تضادها و تعارض‌ منافع مابین آنها شود. ازاین‌رو با توجه به ضرورت توجه به خواسته‌های ساکنین و نیز نیازهای گردشگران، تعارض منافع این دو قشر در محدوده‌ی گذر تاریخی صدر شهر تبریز مورد شناسایی قرار می‌گیرد.
هدف: در این پژوهش، هدف درک صحیحی از سازوکار تعارض منافع ساکنین و گردشگران و دستیابی به اهداف هم‌راستا بین نیازهای گردشگران و ساکنان و کاربست آن در طرح‌های بازآفرینی و توسعه گردشگری از منظر کالبدی است.
روش: روش پژوهش ترکیبی بوده و با راهبرد پس‌کاوی انجام یافته است. تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات به صورت تحلیل عامل اکتشافی و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS Ver 22 صورت گرفته است.
یافته‌ها: عوامل شناسایی شده شامل چهار مورد بودند؛ عامل اول شامل حضور گردشگران و شادابی و نشاط محله، استقبال از گردشگران و پذیرش آن‌ها، کاهش هزینه‌های گردشگران، کاربری‌های ویژه تفریحی گردشگری، شلوغی معبر به منظور افزایش امنیت گردشگران؛ عامل دوم شامل مراکز اقامتی گردشگری، زیرساخت‌های گردشگری، کسب‌وکارهای گردشگری، تنوع و دامنه‌ی فعالیت‌ها و آزادی انتخاب گردشگران در انتخاب فعالیت‌ها؛ عامل سوم شامل دید و منظرهای مناسب، راحتی تردد پیاده و دوچرخه، دسترسی به حمل‌ونقل عمومی، بهداشت محیطی و فضای سبز؛ و عامل چهارم شامل باززنده‌سازی مراسمات ملی و مذهبی.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان می‌دهد که تعارض منافعی بین ساکنان و گردشگران در گذر تاریخی صدر وجود ندارد و ساکنان و گردشگران در یک نظام متعادل از منافع با جذب امکانات متنوع و متفاوت، ضمن ایجاد بستری مناسب می‌توانند موجب ایجاد تعادل منافع در این گذر تاریخی شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identify the Conflict Between Residents’ and Tourists’ Interests in Tourist Routes of Historical Urban Contexts (Case Study: Sadr Alley in Tabriz)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamed Beyti 1
  • Bagher Pourjavadasl 2
  • Mahya Hassani Marand 3
  • Mohammad Gholipour 4
1 Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Master of Restoration & Rehabilitation of Monuments and Historical Fabric, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Shadid Beheshti University (SBU)
3 Master of Urban Design, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
4 Bachelor of Urban Engineering, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: Abandonment, decline of dynamism, and loss of life in urban-historical and residential contexts are issues for which, the presence of tourists is always considered as a solution. Differing goals, priorities, and desires between the two groups of residents and tourists, as well as occurrence of problems and existence of different advantages for each group, can lead to conflict between them. Therefore, considering the necessity of paying attention to the demands of residents, as well as demands of tourists, the conflict between these two groups are examined within the historical Sadr alley of Tabriz city.
Objectives: The main objective of the current research was to understand the conflict of interests and achieving aligned goals between the demands of tourists and the desires of residents.
Method: The research method has been a combination of qualitative and exploratory strategy. The data analysis was conducted using exploratory factor analysis and the SPSS Ver. 22 software.
Results: The identified factors included four main aspects: the first factor includes “the presence of tourists and the vibrancy and liveliness of the neighborhood, welcoming and acceptance of tourists, reduction of tourists' expenses, special tourism entertainment land uses, and the congestion of alley in order to enhance tourists' safety; the second factor includes tourist accommodation facilities, tourism infrastructures, tourism-oriented businesses, diversity and range of activities, and tourists' freedom of choice in selecting activities; the third factor includes appropriate views and landscapes, ease of pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access to public transportation, environmental hygiene, and green spaces; and the fourth factor included the revival of national and religious ceremonies.
Conclusion: The results indicate that there is no conflict between residents and tourists in the historical area, and residents and tourists can create a balanced system of benefits by embracing diverse and different amenities, while creating a suitable infrastructure, thereby fostering a balance of interests in the historical Sadr alley.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Conflict of Interests
  • Urban Tourism
  • Historical Contexts
  • Sadr

مراجع

Afzali, R. (2021). Political-Social Crises of Earthquakes in Iran. University of Tehran Press.[In Persian]
Alimohammadi, H., Bakhshi, A., & Yekrangnia, M. (2024). Seismic risk assessment of Tehran masonry school buildings and prioritizing them for seismic retrofitting using reliability methods. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06666-2
Antonioni, G., SpadoniI, G., & Cozzani, V. (2007). A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 147(1–2), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.043
Aven, T. (2015). Implications of black swans to the foundations and practice of risk assessment and management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 134, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.004
Barquet, K., Englund, M., Inga, K., André, K., & Segnestam, L. (2024). Conceptualising multiple hazards and cascading effects on critical infrastructures. Disasters, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12591
Carpenter, S. R., Bennett, E. M., & Peterson, G. D. (2006). Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview. Ecology and Society, 11(1). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26267787
Del Gaudio, C., Ricci, P., Verderame, G. M., & Manfredi, G. (2016). Observed and predicted earthquake damage scenarios: the case study of Pettino (L’Aquila) after the 6th April 2009 event. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(10), 2643–2678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9919-2
Firuzi, E., Ansari, A., Amini Hosseini, K., & Rashidabadi, M. (2019). Probabilistic earthquake loss model for residential buildings in Tehran, Iran to quantify annualized earthquake loss. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17(5), 2383–2406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00561-z
Ghafari Nasab, Esfandiar, & Iman, Mohammad Taqi. (2013). Philosophical foundations of complex systems theory. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19(76), 41-59. [In Persian]
Gill, J. C., & Malamud, B. D. (2014). Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(4), 680–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000445
Glade, T., Kappes, M., Frigerio, S., & Malet, J. (2012). MULTI-HAZARD EXPOSURE ANALYSES WITH MULTIRISK-A PLATFORM FOR USER-FRIENDLY ANALYSES. www.interpraevent.at
Glenn, J. C. (2009). The futures wheel. Futures Research Methodology—Version, 3, 19.
Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2009). Futures research methodology: version 3.0. Millennium Project Washington, DC.
Gong, S., Ye, Y., Gao, X., Chen, L., & Wang, T. (2023). Empirical patterns of interdependencies among critical infrastructures in cascading disasters: Evidence from a comprehensive multi-case analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 95, 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103862
Hajimirrahimi, S. D., Värnik, R., Eftekhari, E., Petrescu, D. C., Petrescu-Mag, R. M., Pour, M., & Azadi, H. (2024). Towards the institutionalization of ethics: agricultural experts’ knowledge of planning effective management of passive defense in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04534-4
Hill, E. M., McCaughey, J. W., Switzer, A. D., Lallemant, D., Wang, Y., & Sathiakumar, S. (2024). Human amplification of secondary earthquake hazards through environmental modifications. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 5(6), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00551-z
Hochrainer, S., & Mechler, R. (2011). Natural disaster risk in Asian megacities. Cities, 28(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.001
Huang, X., & Wang, N. (2024). Post-disaster restoration planning of interdependent infrastructure Systems: A framework to balance social and economic impacts. Structural Safety, 107, 102408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102408
Jahangiri, K., Eivazi, M.-R., & Sayah Mofazali, A. (2017). The role of Foresight in avoiding systematic failure of natural disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 21, 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.008
JICA. (2001). Final Report of the Microzonation Project of Greater Tehran.[In Persian]
Kalantari, M., Firuzi, E., Ahmadipour, M., & Sorooshian, S. (2023). Estimating annualized earthquake loss for residential buildings in Tehran, Iran. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 21(4), 2259–2280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01604-8
Kamranzad, F., Memarian, H., & Zare, M. (2020). Earthquake Risk Assessment for Tehran, Iran. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070430
Kappes, M. S., Keiler, M., von Elverfeldt, K., & Glade, T. (2012). Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: A review. In Natural Hazards (Vol. 64, Issue 2, pp. 1925–1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0294-2
Karimi, A., & Tolui far, A. (2024). Improving software quality assurance by using common global standards. Passive Defense. https://pd.ihu.ac.ir/article_209339.html
Kheirizadeh Arouq, M., Esmaeilpour, M., & Sarvar, H. (2020). Vulnerability assessment of cities to earthquake based on the catastrophe theory: a case study of Tabriz city, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79(14), 354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09103-2
Kirsch, M. T. D., Leidman, M. E., Weiss, D. W., & Doocy, P. S. (2012). The impact of the earthquake and humanitarian assistance on household economies and livelihoods of earthquake-affected populations in Haiti. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 7(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2012.0084
Kumasaki, M., King, M., Arai, M., & Yang, L. (2016). Anatomy of cascading natural disasters in Japan: main modes and linkages. Natural Hazards, 80(3), 1425–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2028-8
Kunreuther, H. (1996). Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12(2–3), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055792
Kuosa, T. (2011). Evolution of futures studies. Futures, 43(3), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.001
Luesink, M., Wolbers, J., Duin, M. van, & Kuipers, S. (2024). Scenario planning to enable foresight in crisis management. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4093097
Marciano, C., Peresan, A., Pirni, A., Pittore, M., Tocchi, G., & Zaccaria, A. M. (2024). A participatory foresight approach in disaster risk management: The multi-risk storylines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 114, 104972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104972
Maskrey, A., Jain, G., & Lavell, A. (2023). The social construction of systemic risk: towards an actionable framework for risk governance. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 32(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-07-2022-0155
Mavrouli, M., Mavroulis, S., Lekkas, E., & Tsakris, A. (2023). An Emerging Health Crisis in Turkey and Syria after the Earthquake Disaster on 6 February 2023: Risk Factors, Prevention and Management of Infectious Diseases. Healthcare, 11(7), 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11071022
May, F. (2007). Cascading disaster models in postburn flash flood. The Fire Environment—Innovations, Management, and Policy, 443–464.
Mitra, A., & Shaw, R. (2023). Systemic risk from a disaster management perspective: A review of current research. Environmental Science & Policy, 140, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.022
Mosadeghrad, A. M., Dehnavi, H., & Darrudi, A. (2024). Equity in distribution of hospital beds in Tehran province. Payesh (Health Monitor) Journal, 23(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.61186/payesh.23.2.171
Mozaffari, Z., & Ghasemi, M. (2024). Identifying the key drivers of the sustainable development of rural tourism with a foresight approach (Case study: Neyshabur county). Program and Development Research, 5(1), 41-77. doi: 10.22034/pbr.2024.429826.1394 [In Persian]
NGUYEN, J. (2024). Systemic Risk vs. Systematic Risk: What’s the Difference?
Nola, I. A. (2018). Earthquakes and their environmental, medical and public health impacts. Salud Pública de México, 60(Supl.1), 16. https://doi.org/10.21149/9212
Nomura, S., Parsons, A. J. Q., Hirabayashi, M., Kinoshita, R., Liao, Y., & Hodgson, S. (2016). Social determinants of mid- to long-term disaster impacts on health: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 16, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.01.013
Paté‐Cornell, E. (2012). On “Black Swans” and “Perfect Storms”: Risk Analysis and Management When Statistics Are Not Enough. Risk Analysis, 32(11), 1823–1833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01787.x
Paul, S. (2016). The Perception of Risk. In Scientists Making a Difference (pp. 179–182). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316422250.040
Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2015). A definition of cascading disasters and cascading effects: Going beyond the “toppling dominos” metaphor. Planet@ Risk, 3(1), 58–67.
Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2018). Understanding Compound, Interconnected, Interacting, and Cascading Risks: A Holistic Framework. Risk Analysis, 38(11), 2245–2257. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13128
Phraknoi, N., Sutanto, J., Hu, Y., Goh, Y. S., & Lee, C. E. C. (2023). Older people’s needs in urban disaster response: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 96, 103809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103809
Polese, M. (2015). Improving emergency preparedness with simulation of cascading events scenarios. Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2015 Conference, Kristiansand.
Poudel, A., Argyroudis, S., & Pitilakis, K. (2024). Systemic seismic risk assessment of urban healthcare system considering interdependencies to critical infrastructures. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 103, 104304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104304
Pourezzat, A. (2011). Era-based Strategic Management. Imam Sadeq University(AS). Iran. [In Persian]
Schweizer, P.-J., & Renn, O. (2019). Systemische Risiken und Transformationsprozesse auf dem Weg zu einer nachhaltigen Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftsentwicklung. In Nachhaltiges Management (pp. 211–227). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57693-9_11
Sulfikkar Ahamed, M., Sarmah, T., Dabral, A., Chatterjee, R., & Shaw, R. (2023). Unpacking systemic, cascading, and compound risks: A case based analysis of Asia Pacific. Progress in Disaster Science, 18, 100285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100285
Sun, Z., Tavakoli, S., Khalilpour, K., Voinov, A., & Marshall, J. P. (2024). Barriers to Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Networks: A Multi-Dimensional PESTLE Analysis. Sustainability, 16(4), 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041517
Tagliacozzo, S., Guadagno, L., & Ayeb-Karlsson, S. (2022). How do population movements fit within the framework of systemic risk? Progress in Disaster Science, 16, 100256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100256
Tan, X., Zhong, Y., Vivian, A., Geng, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhao, D. (2024). Towards an era of multi-source uncertainty: A systematic and bibliometric analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103411
Tanaka, Y. (2012). Disaster Policy and Education Changes over 15 Years in Japan. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 14(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2012.687623
Terzi, S., Torresan, S., Schneiderbauer, S., Critto, A., Zebisch, M., & Marcomini, A. (2019). Multi-risk assessment in mountain regions: A review of modelling approaches for climate change adaptation. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.100
UNISDR. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 - 2030.
USTA, P., & ONAT, Ö. (2023). An Overview of Temporary Housing Management after the Earthquakes in Turkey in terms of Disaster Management. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 7(1), 1460–1468. https://doi.org/10.56554/jtom.1204406
van ‘t Klooster, S. A., Cramer, T., & van Asselt, M. B. A. (2024). Foresight in action: A longitudinal study based on a 25-year journey in the world of policy-oriented foresight. Futures, 155, 103294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103294
Wang, J., He, Z., & Weng, W. (2020). A review of the research into the relations between hazards in multi-hazard risk analysis. Natural Hazards, 104(3), 2003–2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04259-3
Yaghmaei, N. (2020). Human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years, 2000-2019. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
Zhang, Y., Weng, W. G., & Huang, Z. L. (2018). A scenario-based model for earthquake emergency management effectiveness evaluation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.001
Zuccaro, G., De Gregorio, D., & Leone, M. F. (2018). Theoretical model for cascading effects analyses. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 30, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.019
دانش شهرسازی
دوره 8، شماره 4
1403
صفحه 43-60

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 10 فروردین 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 01 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 10 آبان 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار