تبیین فرایند طراحی شهری همکارانه با بهره گیری از رهیافت تفکر طراحی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه شهرسازی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

بیان مسئله: لازمه‌ی طراحی شهری نوعی همکاری است که کنشگران در آن بتوانند ضمن ایجاد درک مشترکی از فعالیت‌هایشان در یک فرایند یکپارچه‌ی منطقی، به ماهیت نوآورانه راه‌حل‌های طراحی پاسخ دهند. این مهم عمدتاً با تعارضاتی مواجه است، زیرا علیرغم کاربرد روش‍های علمی و همکارانه قبل از مرحله تولید طرح، بخش طراحی غالباً به صورت بخشی و مجزا، از سوی طراحان و بدون همکاری معنادار سایر کنشگران انجام می‌شود. به گونه‌ای که محصول طراحی با حداقل تعامل و با رویکرد "دانای کل" و  "جعبه سیاه  طراحی" به وجود می‌آید.
هدف: هدف از این تحقیق ارائه چارچوب مفهومی برای عملیاتی کردن فرایند طراحی شهری همکارانه در مرحله تولید طرح با تعامل کنشگران است.
روش: این موضوع با واکاوی دو رهیافت عقلانیت همکارانه و تفکر طراحی انجام شده است که مورد دوم کمتر در طراحی شهری و بیشتر در سایر حوزه‌های طراحی مورد توجه بوده است.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های این تحقیق که در قالب گام‌های هشتگانه تبیین شده است، نشان می‌دهد مرحله طراحی، خود فرایندی چندی بعدی، چند سطحی و چند عاملی است که نیازمند چرخه‌ای متوالی از مفهوم‌سازی، ساخت و پردازش ایده، ارائه راه‌حل‌ها و ارزیابی آنهاست.
نتیجه­ گیری: فرایند طراحی همکارانه بر پایه یادگیری، شبکه‌ای از تعامل و تصمیم گیری را بین کنشگران شامل مدیران و متولیان، متخصصین و تهیه کنندگان طرح اعم از طراح شهری و یا سایر حوزه های مرتبط، سرمایه گذاران، و کاربران به‌وجود می‌آورد که با استفاده از مهارت‌های اجتماعی و فنآورانه، چالش بین استفاده از روش‌های علمی و کشف و شهودی را در طراحی شهری به حداقل رسانده و بستر  مشارکت خلاقانه‌ای را در طراحی شهری (در مرحله تولید طرح) فراهم می‍کند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploring the Collaborative Urban Design Process based on Design Thinking

نویسندگان [English]

  • Behnaz Aminzadeh 1
  • Shohreh Ezzatian 2
1 Professor, Department of Urban Planning , College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 PhD student of urban planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Urban design as an evolutionary, multidimensional, and context-oriented process is the ground of multifaceted interactions of tendencies that shape the relationship between humans and the built environment in the public sphere over time. Also, this field derives the legitimacy of its theories from various intellectual roots and professional practices. Therefore, it is affected by a wide range of constraints, multiplicity of stakeholders, and complexities of making decisions in regard to the process of design. Some find dissatisfaction with the multiplicity of urban design due to its ambiguity, and some see it as a subset of a larger group such as the political economy of space, urban studies, urban planning, landscape design, sustainability, and architecture. Urban design requires a kind of interdisciplinary collaboration that the stakeholders in the position of design professionals, managers, investors, and space users can reach a common understanding of their activities. This common understanding comes about through the integration of science and methods in an integrated process. On the other hand, creativity is an integral part of the plan production process in urban design. Interpersonal creativity in this design process can be realized by creating a platform for the presence of creative people and creating shared creativity in an interactive way. This platform requires a collaborative design process; But currently, the plan production stage in urban design is often done in a partial and separate way by designers and without meaningful collaboration of other stakeholders. Meanwhile, the design production stage is a multi-dimensional, multi-level, and multi-factor stage. Urban design has been defined in the theoretical literature as a collaborative and transdisciplinary process for shaping the physical environment. In practice, however, the stage of the creation of idea and idea generation is led separately and in part only by the designer.  Therefore, no significant interaction with the other stakeholders is done. For example, in the Shahid Nawab Safavid Highway project in Tehran, the urban authority's power in preparing and implementing the plan by relying on municipal support, implementing the plan based on the pre-determined and totally inflexible plan, limited public participation, limited choice, a linear process, and lack of the intervention of the stakeholders shows the insufficient process. Thus, the design product is created with minimal interaction and with the " Elitism " and "design black box" approach. This is while the stage of creating an idea is itself a multi-dimensional, multi-level, and multi-factor stage. The purpose of this research is to provide a conceptual framework for creating a collaborative design process at the idea generation stage in the urban design process. For this purpose, in this research, an attempt is made to answer the question of what components are there in the realization of collaborative urban design in the plan production stage.   Considering the creative nature of design, how can the design production stage in the urban design process be formed with a scientific approach based on the interaction and collaboration between stakeholders? Also, in the case study, according to the nature of collaborative urban design, the question is answered, how the proposed process can be operationalized in a research case study? The purpose of this research is to provide a conceptual framework for the realization of the collaborative design process in the design production stage in urban design.
Methodology: Quantitative and qualitative analysis methods have been used in this research. First, using the qualitative analysis method and the content analysis method in the creative/rational process of urban design, indicators, and components were extracted to compile the framework. These components include: diversity of stakeholders; limiting the number of stakeholders; power networking; validating the conversation; making collaboration meaningful; mutual learning; divergence of the discovery process; convergence of the problem-solving process; interactive learning; toolbox application; test and risk.
Results: The results suggest the collaborative design process as a series of cycles of conceptualization, ideation, solution presentation, and evaluation as a result of the forces of power, which are networked in a spatial relationship with the collaboration of stakeholders. From the overlap of the design thinking process as a creative arm and collaborative rationality as a rational arm, the collaborative design process is formed in 8 steps. Each step of this process has interactive feedback that is revised by asking questions in case of a lack of informed consensus building.
Discussion: In the proposed process Power is formed from the collaboration of interaction and mutual learning (learning through interaction), which can be considered the center of the sphere, which forms the cycle of interaction of stakeholders in one spatial dimension and the production cycle of design in another dimension.  Wherever the power of interaction and learning during the process is stronger on the design production cycle, the product of the design is driven to that superior power.
Conclusion: The proposed collaborative design process is proposed in 8 steps with criteria and sub-criteria. It needs to be implemented in a networked and integrated system in a set of data and hybrid methods and the details can be studied in another study.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Collaborative design
  • Urban design process
  • Idea generation
  • Design thinking
  • Collaborative rationality
منابع
هیلییر، جین، (1388). سایه‌های قدرت. ترجمه کمال پولادی، تهران: انتشارات جامعه مهندسان مشاور ایران
امینی، مرتضی، (1396). گزارش عملکرد سالانه شورای شهر اصفهان، شورای شهر اصفهان، اردیبهشت ماه

گرجی مهلبانی، یوسف، (1386). تفکر طراحی و الگوهای فرایند آن. نشریه صفه، 16(45)، 106-123

مدنی‌پور، علی، (1396). طراحی شهری فضا و جامعه. ترجمه بهناز امین‌زاده گوهرریزی و راضیه رضا بیگی انتشارات دانشگاه تهران
 یزدی، مهدی و امین­زاده، بهناز، (1396). ارزیابى طرح میدان امام حسین (ع) تهران با تأکید بر یادآورهاى شهرى، نشریه هویت شهر، 11(32)، 45-56