تببین عوامل مؤثر بر شهر هوشمند با تأکید بر اجتماع دانشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، واحد آیت اله آملی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آمل، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه معماری و شهرسازی، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد آیت الله آملی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آمل، ایران.

10.22124/upk.2024.25444.1882

چکیده

بیان مسئله: با ترکیب دانش(شهروندان) و تکنولوژی هوشمند، می‌توان شهرها را به مکان‌هایی تبدیل کرد که از خدمات بهتری برخوردار باشند، محیط زیست را حفظ کنند، اقتصاد را ترقی دهند و توانمندی‌های اجتماعی و فرهنگی جامعه را بهبود بخشند. این تبیین نقش مهمی در ساختاردهی شهرهای آینده و بهبود کیفیت زندگی شهروندان ایفا می‌کند.
هدف: این مقاله در پی آن است با مرور مطالعات انجام شده در خصوص شهر هوشمند و اجتماع دانشی( 72 مقاله) به مقایسه و تحلیل متغیرها و روش‌ها در مقیاس‌ها و رویکردهای به کار گرفته شده بپردازد.
روش: روش تحقیق به کار رفته در این پژوهش "روش فراترکیب " بوده است. این روش در راستای دستیابی هدف بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر خلق شهر هوشمند با تأکید بر اجتماع دانشی به کار گرفته شده است.
یافته‌ها: نتایـج نشـان می‌دهد؛ چارچـوب نظـری و تحلیــل هوشمند دانشی، مفهومــی چندرشــته‌ای اســت کــه پایه‌های مفهــوم و بســط نظــری آن، از حوزه‌های مطالعاتــی تحــت ســیطره شهر هوشمند، شهر دانش پایه، اجتماع دانشی، جامعه اطلاعاتی، شهر یادگیری، مکان دانشی منتــج شــده اســت. تحلیل مقالات بین سال‌های 2000 تا 2023 در این حوزه انتشار یافته‌اند، نشان داد مطالعات صورت گرفته عمدتا در قالب 5 مولفه به موضوع " شهر هوشمند با تاکید بر اجتماع دانشی" پرداخته‌اند: حکمرانی، اقتصاد، محیط، فرهنگ و فناوری.
نتیجه‌گیری: از ارزیابـی یکپارچـه یافته‌های پژوهـش می‌توان اسـتنباط کـرد کـه نـه تنهـا درک مفهـوم شهر هوشمند دانشی در پژوهش‌های داخلــی بــه کفایــت رخ نــداده اســت، بلکــه به‌واسطه مطالعــات ســطحی و عــدم درک مناســب از مفاهیــم بنیادیــن از اجتماع دانشی، نیــاز بــه مطالعــه عمیق‌تر در ایــن حـوزه وجـود دارد. در پایان چارچوب نظری شهر هوشمند با تاکید بر اجتماع دانشی برگرفته از یک بررسی یکپارچه آورده شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Factors Influencing Smart Cities with Emphasis on Knowledge Society

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohammad Elmi 1
  • Ali Shamsoddini 2
  • saba jahangir 3
1 Ph.D. Student in Urban Planning, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background: By combining knowledge (citizens) and smart technology, cities can transform into places that offer better services, preserve the environment, promote economic growth, and enhance the social and cultural capabilities of the community.
Objectives: This paper aims to compare and analyze variables, scales, and approaches used in studies related to smart cities and knowledge societies (72 articles).
Methodology: The research method used in this study is the "meta-analysis" method, which is employed to examine the factors influencing the creation of smart cities with an emphasis on knowledge societies.
Findings: The results indicate that the theoretical framework and analysis of smart knowledge are multidimensional concepts that draw upon various theoretical foundations from the fields of smart cities, knowledge-based cities, knowledge societies, information society, learning cities, and knowledge places. The analysis of articles published between 2000 and 2023 in this field shows that the studies mainly focus on five components related to "smart cities with an emphasis on knowledge societies": governance, economy, environment, culture, and technology.
Conclusion: From the comprehensive evaluation of research findings, it can be inferred that not only is the understanding of the concept of smart knowledge cities insufficient in domestic research, but also due to superficial studies and an inadequate understanding of fundamental concepts of knowledge societies, there is a need for deeper studies in this field. Finally, a theoretical framework for smart cities with an emphasis on knowledge societies is derived from this comprehensive review.
Background: By combining knowledge (citizens) and smart technology, cities can transform into places that offer better services, preserve the environment, promote economic growth, and enhance the social and cultural capabilities of the community.
Objectives: This paper aims to compare and analyze variables, scales, and approaches used in studies related to smart cities and knowledge societies (72 articles).
• Based on the conducted reviews, the concepts of economy, culture, governance, environment, and technology are the most frequently repeated within the fields of smart city and knowledge society.
• The opinions of three thinkers, "Iği̇t Kanlar, VanLo, and Alğar," have been crucial in designing the

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Fundamental Knowledge City
  • Smart City
  • Knowledge Society
  • Knowledge Workers
  • امیدی شاه‌آباد، امید؛ بدری، سید علی؛ رضوانی، محمدرضا و زالی، نادر. (1398). تحلیل عوامل کلیدی موثر بر شکل‌دهی الگوی آمایش فضاهای روستایی با رویکرد آینده‌نگاری) مورد مطالعه: استان لرستان . پژوهشهای روستائی، 10(2)، 113-92.

    زالی، نادر. (1398). آینده‌نگاری منطقه‌ای بازتعریف آینده‌پژوهانه از فرایند برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای. آینده پژوهی ایران، 263-288، 4(1).

    زالی، نادر. (1379). درجه بندی توسعه منطقه‌ای، مطالعه موردی استان آذربایجان شرقی (پایان‌نامه دکتری، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده هنر و معماری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه شیراز).

    احمدپور، احمد؛ زیاری، کرامت‌اله؛ حاتمی‌نژاد، حسین و پارسا، شهرام. (1397). شهر هوشمند: تبیین ضرورت‌ها و الزامات شهر تهران برای هوشمندی. نگرش‌های نو در جغرافیای انسانی، 10(2)، 1-22.

    ربانی ارشد، حمید؛ اصغری صارم، علی؛ اسلامبولچی، علیرضا و سعیدی، مهدی. (1399). شناسایی و تفسیر الگوهای ذهنی مدیران شهری نسبت به شهر هوشمند با روش‌شناسی کیو (مورد مطالعه: شهر همدان). مدیریت دولتی، 12(3)، 494-527.

    کمانداری، محسن؛ رهنما، محمد رحیم. (1396). ارزیابی شاخص‌های شهر هوشمند در چهار منطقه شهر کرمان. فضای جغرافیایی، 17(58)، 209-226.

    پوراحمد، احمد؛ زیاری، کرامت اله؛ حاتمی نژاد، حسین و پارسا پشاه‌آبادی، شهرام. (1397). مفهوم و ویژگی‌های شهر هوشمند. باغ نظر، 15(58)، 5-26.

    محمدی، جلیل؛ محمدی، علیرضا؛ غفاری گیلانده، عطا و یزدانی، محمد حسن. (1400). سنجش تأثیرپذیری شهر از نماگرهای شهر هوشمند (مطالعۀ موردی: شهر زنجان). پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی، 53(2)، 521-543.

    مرادی، شیما. (1398). بررسی سیر موضوعی مطالعات حوزه شهر هوشمند. پژوهش نامه علم سنجی، 5(1)، 139-160.

    مهدی زاده، معین. (1398). بررسی رابطه بین شهر هوشمند و توسعه پایدار و چالش‌های دستیابی به شهر هوشمند پایدار. شباک، 5(7) ، 119-128.

    پورجوان، خسرو. (1398). تبیین شهر هوشمند و راهکارهای حمل ونقل هوشمند شهری. کارافن، 16(1)، 15-34.

    References

    • Alraout, A. (2006). Knowledge Cities: Examining the discourse smart villages, internet cities or creativity engines, Planning Malaysia, 4(1).21837/pm.v4i1.52
    • Aditya, T., Ningrum, S., Nurasa, H., & Irawati, I. (2023). Community needs for the digital divide on the smart city policy. Heliyon, 9(8). doi: 1016/j.scs.2020.102394.
    • Ahmadpour, A., Ziyari, K. A., Hataminiajad, H., Parsa, S. (2018). Smart City: Explaining the Necessities and Requirements of Tehran for Smartness. New Perspectives in Human Geography, 10(2), 1-22.
    • Ale-eshagh, Parisa; Hodavand, Mehdi. (2013). Investigation of new sources of revenue for municipalities. Comparative Law Research of Iran and International, 6 (22), 1-28. doi:30495/JUPM.2022.5534 (In Persian)
    • Alilyyani, B., Almalki, M., Alghashmari, M., Alotaibi, M., Albogami, A., Alharthi, M., . . . Khandaker, M. U. (2023). Assessing the knowledge of staff nurses about epilepsy in Taif City of Saudi Arabia: A descriptive study. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 16(3), 100610. doi:https://doi.org/1016/j.jrras.2023.100610
    • Allam, Z., & Newman, P. (2018). Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance. Smart Cities, 1(1), 4-25. doi:10.3390/smartcities1010002
    • Ana Cristina Fachinelli, Fernanda Pauletto D’Arrigo & Karl Joachim Breunig (2018) The value context in knowledge-based development: revealing the context factors in the development of Southern Brazils Vale dos Vinhedos region, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16:1, 32-41, DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2017.1405143
    • Antwi-Afari, P., Owusu-Manu, D.-G., Ng, S. T., & Asumadu, G. (2021). Modeling the smartness or smart development levels of developing countries’ cities. Journal of Urban Management, 10(4), 369-381. doi:10.1016/j.jum.2021.06.005
    • Araral, E. (2020). Why do cities adopt smart technologies? Contingency theory and evidence from the United States. Cities, 106, 102873. doi:1016/j.cities.2020.102873
    • Bashirpour Bonab, A., Bellini, F., & Rudko, I. (2023). Theoretical and analytical assessment of smart green cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 137315. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137315
    • Bastidas, V., Reychav, I., & Helfert, M. (2023). Design Principles for Strategic Alignment in Smart City Enterprise Architectures (SCEA). Procedia Computer Science, 219, 848-855. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.359
    • Batchelor, s., Smith, j. (2014). Tools for improving decentralized governance of energy. Renewable energy and decentralization. DOI:10.13140/2.1.2780.4484
    • Beck, D., Ferasso, M., Storopoli, J., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2023). Achieving the sustainable development goals through stakeholder value creation: Building up smart sustainable cities and communities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 399, 136501. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136501
    • Benites, A. J., & Simões, A. F. (2021). Assessing the urban sustainable development strategy: An application of a smart city services sustainability taxonomy. Ecological Indicators, 127, 107734. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107734
    • Bidram, rasool. (2011). investigating areas of rent seeking in the budget structure of municipalities and its relation to efficiency; Case study: Metropolitan municipalities. Urban Management Journal. Spring and Summer 2011, Volume 9. doi:https://sid.ir/paper/384038/fa(In Persian)
    • Blaikie, Daniel (2010). An Interview with Charles Taylor on Faith, Philosophy, and Politics. Gnosis 11 (1):1-14.
    • Bloom, E., Sunseri, A., & Leonard, A. (2007). Measuring and Strengthening Local Governance Capacity: The Local Governance Barometer. DOI:10.4000/metropoles.4297.
    • Borraz, O., & Le Galès, P. (2010). Urban governance in Europe: the government of what? Pôle Sud, (1), 137-151.
    • Bubelíny, O., & Kubina, M. (2021). Impact of the concept Smart City on public transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 55, 1361-1367. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.120
    • Cai, M., Kassens-Noor, E., Zhao, Z., & Colbry, D. (2023). Are smart cities more sustainable? An exploratory study of 103 U.S. cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 137986. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137986
    • Capuno, J. J. (2000). GOFORDEV Index: Advocating good governance for local development. Issues & Letters, 9(5-6).
    • Capuno, J. J., Garcia, M. M. S., & Sardalla, J. S. (2001). Promoting local development through good governance: A partial assessment of the GOFORDEV Index. Issues & Letters, 10(3), 1016/j.jum.2018.12.009.
    • Caratù, M., Pigliautile, I., Piselli, C., & Fabiani, C. (2023). A perspective on managing cities and citizens' well-being through smart sensing data. Environmental Science & Policy, 147, 169-176. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.012
    • Carrillo, D., Plosila, J., & Nardelli, P. H. Ullah, M., Kakakhel, S. R. U., Westerlund, T., Wolff, A., (2020). Iot protocol selection for smart grid applications: Merging qualitative and quantitative metrics. In 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO) (pp. 993-998). IEEE. doi:10.23919/MIPRO48935.2020.9245238
    • Clement, J., Ruysschaert, B., & Crutzen, N. (2023). Smart city strategies – A driver for the localization of the sustainable development goals? Ecological Economics, 213, 107941. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107941
    • Cohen, G. L. Han, H., Kim, J., Jeong, C.,(2017). Attainable and Relevant Moral Exemplars Are More Effective than Extraordinary Exemplars in Promoting Voluntary Service Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 283.3389/fpsyg.2017.00283
    • Dameri, R.P. (2017). Smart City Definition, Goals and Performance. In: Smart City Implementation. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45766-6_1
    • Dameri, R.P.Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (2019). Public Value, Governance Models and Co-Creation in Smart Cities. In: Rodriguez Bolivar, M.P. (eds) Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 35. Springer, Cham.1007/978-3-319-98953-2_11
    • Dashkevych, O., & Portnov, B. A. (2023). Does city smartness improve urban environment and reduce income disparity? Evidence from an empirical analysis of major cities worldwide. Sustainable Cities and Society, 96, 104711. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104711
    • De Marco, A., & Mangano, G. (2021). Evolutionary trends in smart city initiatives. Sustainable Futures, 3, 100052. doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2021.100052
    • Deng, G., & Fei, S. (2023). Exploring the factors influencing online civic engagement in a smart city: The mediating roles of ICT self-efficacy and commitment to community. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107682. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107682
    • Desdemoustier, J., Crutzen, N., Cools, M., & Teller, J. (2019). Smart City appropriation by local actors: An instrument in the making. Cities, 92, 175-186. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.021
    • Edge, S., Boluk, K., Groulx, M., & Quick, M. (2020). Exploring diverse lived experiences in the Smart City through Creative Analytic Practice. Cities, 96, 102478. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102478
    • Edge, Y., Otoum, S., & Ridhawi, I. A. (2020). Trustworthy and sustainable smart city services at the edge. Sustainable Cities and Society, 62, 102394. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102394
    • Elena, C. (2015). The making of Knowledge Cities in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 534-541. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01429-X
    • Elkhidir, E., Mannakkara, S., Henning, T. F. P., & Wilkinson, S. (2023). A pathway towards resilient cities: National resilience knowledge networks. Cities, 136, 104243. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2023.104243
    • Elkhidir, E., Mannakkara, S., Henning, T. F. P., & Wilkinson, S. (2022). Knowledge types and knowledge transfer mechanisms for effective resilience knowledge-sharing between cities – A case study of New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 70, 102790. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102790
    • Ergazakis, K., Metaxiotis, K. and Psarras, J. (2006), "Knowledge cities: the answer to the needs of knowledge‐based development", VINE, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 67-84.1108/03055720610667381
    • Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Guaralda, M. (2020). Conceptual frameworks of innovation district place quality: An opinion paper. Land Use Policy, 90, 104166. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104166
    • Grossi, G., & Trunova, O. (2021). Are UN SDGs useful for capturing multiple values of smart city? Cities, 114, 103193. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103193
    • Huston, Simon and Warren, Clive.(2012), Risk, Resilience and the 'Knowledge City' (May 14, 2012).
    • Israilidis, J., Odusanya, K., & Mazhar, M. U. (2021). Exploring knowledge management perspectives in smart city research: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 101989. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.015
    • Kamandari, M., Rahnama, M. R. (2017). Evaluation of Smart City Indicators in Four Areas of Kerman City. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 17(58), 209-226.
    • Kanlar, J., Lee, J.-M., & Kang, J. (2023). Smart cities and disaster risk reduction in South Korea by 2022: The case of Daegu. Heliyon, 9(8), e18794. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18794
    • Karimikia, H., Bradshaw, R., Singh, H., Ojo, A., Donnellan, B., & Guerin, M. (2022). An emergent taxonomy of boundary spanning in the smart city context – The case of smart Dublin. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122100. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122100
    • Kawyitri, N., & Shekhar, A. (2021). Assessing vulnerability and capacity of Bhubaneswar as a progressive smart-city: An empirical case study of Fani cyclone impact on the city. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 56, 101986. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101986
    • Kim, C., & Kim, J. (2023). Spatial spillovers of sport industry clusters and community resilience: Bridging a spatial lens to building a smart tourism city. Information Processing & Management, 60(3). doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103266
    • Laurini, R. (2021). A primer of knowledge management for smart city governance. Land Use Policy, 111, 104832. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104832
    • Lim, T. C., Wilson, B., Grohs, J. R., & Pingel, T. J. (2022). Community-engaged heat resilience planning: Lessons from a youth smart city STEM program. Landscape and Urban Planning, 226, 104497. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104497
    • Mabon, L. (2023). At the margins of the international community, but inside global knowledge and policy flows? How cities in Taiwan and Scotland position themselves within intergovernmental rhetoric on nature-based solutions. Nature-Based Solutions, 4, 100086. doi:10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100086
    • Mahdizadeh, M. (2019). Investigating the Relationship between Smart City and Sustainable Development and Challenges of Achieving Sustainable Smart City. Shabak, 5(7), 119-128. (In Persian)
    • Marchesani, F., Masciarelli, F., & Doan, H. Q. (2022). Innovation in cities a driving force for knowledge flows: Exploring the relationship between high-tech firms, student mobility, and the role of youth entrepreneurship. Cities, 130, 103852. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.103852
    • Marimuthu, M., D'Souza, C., & Shukla, Y. (2022). Integrating community value into the adoption framework: A systematic review of conceptual research on participatory smart city applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121779. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121779
    • Mohammadi, J., Mohammadi, A., Ghaffari Gilande, A., Yazdani, M. H. (2021). Measuring the City's Susceptibility to Smart City Elements (Case Study: Zanjan City). Human Geography Research, 53(2), 521-543. doi:10.22059/JHGR.2020.287972.1008000 (In Persian)
    • Mora, L., Gerli, P., Ardito, L., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2023). Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda. Technovation, 123, 102717. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717
    • Moradi, S. (2019). A Review of the Thematic Trend of Smart City Studies. Scientific Information Journal, 5(1), 139-160. (In Persian)
    • Muna Sarimin, Tan Yigitcanlar, Rachel Parker. (2010) Towards a comprehensive and integrated knowledge-based urban development model: status quo and directions. International Journal of Knowledge-Based DevelopmentVol. 3, No. 2. doi:10.22034/JSC.2021.279668.1440(In Persian)
    • Nakano, S., & Washizu, A. (2021). Will smart cities enhance the social capital of residents? The importance of smart neighborhood management. Cities, 115, 103244. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103244
    • Nakano, S., & Washizu, A. (2021). Will smart cities enhance the social capital of residents? The importance of smart neighborhood management. Cities, 115, 103244. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103244
    • Nayeri, B., Zali, N., & Motavaf, S. H. (2019). Identification of regional development drivers by scenario Planning. Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability, 1(2), 34-47. doi:10.22034/IJUMES.2017.06.15.016
    • Nederhand, J., Avelino, F., Awad, I., De Jong, P., Duijn, M., Edelenbos, J., Van Stapele, N. (2023). Reclaiming the city from an urban vitalism perspective: critically reflecting smart, inclusive, resilient and sustainable just city labels. Cities, 137, 104257. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2023.104257
    • Neuman, Yair ; Cohen, Yohai ; Bekerman, Zvi & Nave, Ophir (2013). A generic method for measuring the potential number of structure‐preserving transformations. Complexity 18 (1):26-37.
    • Nicolas, C., Kim, J., & Chi, S. (2021). Natural language processing-based characterization of top-down communication in smart cities for enhancing citizen alignment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, 102674. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102674
    • Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda, (2016). "Towards an urban quality framework: determining critical measures for different geographical scales to attract and retain talent in cities," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 290-312. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2016.078556
    • Nour, M. O., Natto, H. A., Sinky, T. H., Alfaifi, M. S., Alharbi, M. F. J., Allahyani, A. M. K., . . . Al-Zahrani, A. A. D. (2023). Infection transmission via mobile phones in a mass gathering setting: Public knowledge, attitudes and practices in Makkah city, Saudi Arabia. Heliyon, 9(3), e13894. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13894
    • Nunes, S. A. S., Ferreira, F. A. F., Govindan, K., & Pereira, L. F. (2021). “Cities go smart!”: A system dynamics-based approach to smart city conceptualization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127683. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127683
    • Obschonka, M., Tavassoli, S., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2023). Innovation and inter-city knowledge spillovers: Social, geographical, and technological connectedness and psychological openness. Research Policy, 52(8), 104849. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104849
    • Omidishahabadi, A., Badri, S., Razavani, M., Zali, N. (2019). Analysis of Key Factors Affecting the Formation of Rural Space Development Pattern Using Futures Studies Approach (Case Study: Lorestan Province). Rural Research, 10(2), 92-113. doi:10.22059/jrur.2018.217086.993 (In Persian)
    • Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2019). Place making for innovation and knowledge-intensive activities: The Australian experience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 616-625. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.014
    • Pandiyan, P., Saravanan, S., Usha, K., Kannadasan, R., Alsharif, M. H., & Kim, M.-K. (2023). Technological advancements toward smart energy management in smart cities. Energy Reports, 10, 648-677. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.021
    • Pareti, S., Flores, D., Gonzalez, V., & Pareti, M. (2022). Networks, smart city governance and community rituals as mechanisms for reducing the vulnerability of cities. The case of the Chilota “minga”, Chiloé, Chile. Procedia Computer Science, 201, 72-78. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.03.012
    • Pawar, L., Bajaj, R., Singh, J., & Yadav, V. (2019). Smart city IoT: Smart architectural solution for networking, congestion and heterogeneity. In 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICCS) (pp. 124-129). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICCS45141.2019.9065688.
    • Penco, L., Ivaldi, E., Bruzzi, C., & Musso, E. (2020). Knowledge-based urban environments and entrepreneurship: Inside EU cities. Cities, 96, 102443. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102443
    • Phillis, Y. A., Kouikoglou, V. S., & Verdugo, C. (2017). Urban sustainability assessment and ranking of cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 254-265. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.002
    • Pinochet, L.H.C., Romani, G.F., de Souza, C.A. and Rodríguez-Abitia, G. (2019), "Intention to live in a smart city based on its characteristics in the perception by the young public", Revista de Gestão, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 73-92. doi:1108/REGE-06-2018-0077
    • Pliatsios, A., Kotis, K., & Goumopoulos, C. (2023). A systematic review on semantic interoperability in the IoE-enabled smart cities. Internet of Things, 22, 100754. doi:10.1016/j.iot.2023.100754
    • Pourahmad, A., Ziyari, K. A., Hataminiajad, H., Parsapashabadi, S. (2018). The Concept and Characteristics of a Smart City. Bagh-e Nazar, 15(58), 5-26. (In Persian)
    • Pourmohammadi, M. R., & Zali, N. (2004). Human Development, Challenges and Prospects (with an Analytical Look at Human Development Indicators in Iran). Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tabriz, 10(15), 44-52. (In Persian)
    • Purjavan, K. (2019). Explaining Smart City and Strategies for Urban Smart Transportation. Karafan, 16(45), 15-34.(In Persian)
    • Rabani Arshad, H., Asghari Sarem, A., Eslambolchi, A., Saeedi, M. (2020). Identification and Interpretation of Mental Models of Urban Managers Regarding Smart City Using Q Methodology (Case Study: Hamedan City). Public Management, 12(3), 494-527. doi: 10.22059/JIPA.2020.301347.2736 (In Persian)
    • Rp, J., K, R., A, A., & K, L. N. (2021). IoT in smart cities: A contemporary survey. Global Transitions Proceedings, 2(2), 187-193. doi:10.1016/j.gltp.2021.08.069
    • Sarimin, Muna & Yigitcanlar, Tan (2012) Towards a comprehensive and integrated knowledge-based urban development model: status quo and directions. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 3(2), pp. 175-192. DOI:10.1504/IJKBD.2012.047035
    • Sarmast, B., Zali, N. (2010). Spatial order of urban network and demographic planning 1400 horizon; case study: Azerbaijan, Quarterly journal of strategic studies, 13(2(47)). DOI: 20.1001.1.17350727.1389.13.48.3.2
    • Shayan, S., & Kim, K. P. (2023). Understanding correlations between social risks and sociodemographic factors in smart city development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, 104320. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.104320
    • Silva, B. N., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38(February), 697–713. DOI:1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
    • Söderström, O., Blake, E., & Odendaal, N. (2021). More-than-local, more-than-mobile: The smart city effect in South Africa. Geoforum, 122, 103-117. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.03.017
    • Spicer, Z., Goodman, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2023). How ‘smart’ are smart cities? Resident attitudes towards smart city design. Cities, 141, 104442. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2023.104442
    • Sun, H., Fu, L., & Yang, S. (2023). What contributes to the government-citizen knowledge sharing: Analysis of 293 cities in China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100362. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100362
    • van der Wouden, F. (2022). Are Chinese cities getting smarter in terms of knowledge and technology they produce? World Development, 150, 105729. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105729
    • Vesela, D., & Klimova, K. (2015). Creative industries and their relation to translation/interpreting practice and to innovation. Global Journal of Computer Sciences: Theory and Research, 5(1), 19–23.18844/gjcs.v5i1.28
    • Wall, R. U., Jayasinghe, G. Y., Halwatura, R. U., & Rupasinghe, H. T. (2017). The impact of urban green infrastructure as a sustainable approach towards tropical micro-climatic changes and human thermal comfort. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.05.008
    • Yigitcanlar, T., Edvardsson, I. R., Johannesson, H., Kamruzzaman, M., Ioppolo, G., & Pancholi, S. (2017). Knowledge-based development dynamics in less favoured regions: insights from Australian and Icelandic university towns. European Planning Studies, 25(12), 2272-2292. DOI:1080/09654313.2017.1358699
    • Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys, L., Ioppolo, G., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E. M., & Yun, J. J. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, 145-160. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003
    • Yigitcanlar, T., O’Connor, K., & Westerman, C. (2008). The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience. Cities, 25(2), 63-72. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2008.01.001
    • Zali Nader & Ebrahimzadeh Issa & Zamani-Poor Masoud & Arghash Amin, 2014. "City Branding Evaluation and Analysis of Cultural Capabilities of Isfahan City," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(2), pages 213-234, December. DOI: 10.1515/esrp-2015-0013
    • Zali Nader & Ebrahimzadeh Issa & Zamani-Poor Masoud & Arghash Amin. (2014) "City Branding Evaluation and Analysis of Cultural Capabilities of Isfahan City," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(2), pages 213-234, December. DOI: 10.1515/esrp-2015-0013
    • Zali, N. (2000). Regional Development Classification, A Case Study of East Azerbaijan Province (Doctoral dissertation, Master's thesis, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Urban Planning Department, University of Shiraz). (In Persian)
    • Zali, N. (2000). Regional Development Grading, Case Study of East Azarbaijan Province (Doctoral dissertation, MSc Thesis, Faculty of Art and Architecture. Department of Urban Planning. Shiraz University. (In Persian).
    • Zali, N. (2019). Regional Futures Studies Redefining the Future-Oriented Process of Regional Planning. Future Studies of Iran, 4(1), 263-288. DOI: 10.30479/JFS.2019.9822.1033 (In Persian)
    • Zali, N., & Ghanbari Haft-Cheshmeh, A. (2004). Analysis of geographic attitude in regional development and adopte with East Azarbayejan province properties. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciemces Faculty of Tabriz University (Special Issue of Geography), 10(15), 77-98.
    • Zali, N., & Mansouri Birjandi, S. (2015). Analysis of Key Factors Affecting the Development of Sustainable Transport in the Horizon of Tehran Metropolis 1404 (Structural Analysis Method). Spatial Planning and Planning,19(2), 1-31.
    • Zali, N., Ahmadi, H., & Faroughi, S. M. (2013). Aa Analysis of regional disparities situation in the east Azarbaijan Province. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, 7(1), 183–194.
    • Zali,N. Hashemzadeh Ghal'ejough,F. Yaghoub Esmailzadeh, Y(2016) Analyzing urban sprawl of Tehran metropolis in Iran(During 1965-2011). Anuário do Instituto de Geociências. Vol 39, No 3.P. 55-62. DOI: 11137/2016_3_55_62
    • Zenker, S., Eggers, F., & Farsky, M. (2013). Putting a price tag on cities: Insights into the competitive environment of places. Cities, 30, 133-139. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.02.002.