ارزیابی پروژه های مسکن بر اساس شاخص های ساختمان انرژی صفر (مسکن مهر پردیسان شهر قم)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری دانشکده جغرافیا دانشگاه تهران ، تهران ، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری دانشکده جغرافیا دانشگاه تهران ، تهران ، ایران

3 جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری دانشکده جغرافیا دانشگاه تهران ، تهران ، ایران

4 استادیار گروه مطالعات ناحیه ای پژوهشکده محیط زیست جهاد دانشگاهی کشور

چکیده

بیان مسئله: یکی از مفاهیم تقریبا جدید که در ادبیات برنامه ریزی مسکن مطرح شده است ، مفوم مسکن کربن صفر است که بر صرفه جویی در مصرف انرژی و نیز میزان مصرف انرژی تاکید دارد. موضوع مسکن کربن صفر در سال های اخیر مورد توجه پژوهشگران در حوزه مسکن بوده است.
هدف: در این پژوهش که با روش توصیفی – تحلیلی و مبتنی بر روش مطالعات کتابخانه ای و میدانی صورت گرفته است ، هدف بررسی وضعیت محدوده منطقه 8 شهرداری قم از جهت تناسب با شاخص ها و مولفه های مسکن کربن صفر بوده است
روش: برای این منظور پرسشنامه ای تنظیم و در حجم نمونه 386 نفری در محدوده توزیع شده است. در تحلیل یافته ها از آزمون های t تک نمونه ای و آنووا به منظور مقایسه محلات استفاده شده است.
یافته‌ها: نتایج بیانگر این مطلب بود که دراغلب شاخص ها تناسبی مشاهده نمی شود. فقط در سه شاخص  ظرفیت حرارتی جداره با مقدار 2/8  ،مصرف انرژی با مقدار 7/9 و استفاده از انرژی خورشید با مقدار 9/4 وضعیت نسبتا مطلوبی داشته است. همچنین نتایج آزمون آنووا به منظور مقایسه محلات مختلف از حیث تناسب با شاخص های مسکن کربن صفر نیز بیانگر وضعیت محله 1 و وضعیت بد محله شهرک نسبت به سایر محلات دوازده گانه محدوده مورد مطالعه دارد.
نتیجه­ گیری: به طور کلی نتایج علی رغم تفاوت های محسوس میان محلات مختلف بیانگر وضعیت مطلوب از حیث شاخص های مدیریت بهینه انرژی بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Housing Projects Based on Zero Energy Building Indicators (Mehr Pardisan Housing, Qom City)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Zanganeh Shahraki 1
  • mostafa tavakoli 2
  • Amin Mahmoodi Azar 3
  • Habib Mahmoodi chenari 4
1 assistant professor, Department of Urban Planing, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran , Tehran, iran
2 2. Doctoral Student, Department of Urban Planing, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran , Tehran, iran
3 3. Doctoral Student, Department of Urban Planing, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran , Tehran, iran
4 1Department of Regional Studies, Environmental Research Institute, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research)ACECR(, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Urbanization is widely recognized as one of the most prominent phenomena of the contemporary era, to the extent that the present age is often referred to as the era of urbanization. According to United Nations projections, by 2050, nearly 70% of the world's population will reside in urban areas. The rapid growth of cities has generated major developmental challenges in many countries around the world. Among these challenges, various forms of environmental pollution in urban areas are particularly significant. In this context, it can be argued that the root cause of many urban environmental problems is excessive energy consumption, especially the reliance on non-renewable energy sources. Two major crises currently threaten the future of humanity: the depletion of fossil fuel resources and the environmental degradation caused by the indiscriminate use of these fuels. Buildings account for approximately 40% of primary energy consumption, 70% of electricity consumption, and 36% of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. The publication of such statistics has encouraged governments, particularly in developed countries, to adopt innovative approaches in the construction sector, among which zero-energy and zero-carbon buildings have emerged as important solutions. In Iran, energy consumption, particularly in the building sector, also presents significant and noteworthy challenges.
Methodology: This research was conducted using a descriptive–analytical approach based on both library and field research methods. To achieve the research objectives, the study was carried out in two stages. In the first stage, which involved a review of the theoretical literature, an effort was made to compile the latest scientific findings, theoretical foundations, indicators, and criteria relevant to the research. In the second stage, field data were collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire and subsequently analyzed using SPSS software. 
To develop the questionnaire items, eight indicators were considered: reduction of heat exchange, thermal performance of windows, green roofs, carbon dioxide emissions, wind energy utilization, water energy utilization, solar energy utilization, and energy consumption. Following the collection of citizens’ opinions regarding these indicators, the data were analyzed in SPSS using a one-sample t-test to assess the current status of the indicators in the study area and an ANOVA test to compare neighborhoods in terms of the selected indicators and variables. In addition, neighborhoods were ranked according to zero-carbon housing indicators using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Results: The results of the ANOVA analysis, conducted to compare neighborhoods in terms of zero-carbon housing indicators, indicate that Neighborhood 1 achieved the most favorable conditions among the studied neighborhoods. Comparisons with the remaining neighborhoods revealed consistently lower performance levels, suggesting that Neighborhood 1 demonstrates the highest degree of compatibility with zero-carbon housing indicators. In contrast, Shahrek Neighborhood exhibited the least favorable performance across the evaluated indicators. The comparative results show that this neighborhood performed significantly worse than the other neighborhoods with respect to the eight selected indicators and therefore represents the weakest area in terms of compatibility with zero-carbon housing criteria.
Discussion: The analysis of the research data was conducted in three stages. The first stage involved a descriptive analysis of respondents’ characteristics, while the second focused on a descriptive examination of their responses. In the third stage, inferential statistical analyses were performed. Initially, a one-sample t-test was employed to evaluate the status of the selected indicators. Based on the findings, residential buildings in the Pardisan area of Qom demonstrated relatively favorable conditions in terms of wall thermal capacity, energy consumption, and solar energy utilization. However, with regard to the remaining indicators examined in this study, the buildings did not achieve acceptable levels of compliance with zero-carbon housing standards.
Conclusion: This study was conducted to evaluate the condition of residential buildings and housing units in District 8 of Qom City in terms of their compatibility with zero-carbon housing indicators and criteria. Due to the limited availability of objective data, field data were collected through a questionnaire survey.  A one-sample t-test was used to assess the degree of compliance of residential buildings with zero-carbon housing standards. The findings indicated that wall thermal capacity (2.8), energy consumption (9.7), and solar energy utilization (4.9) demonstrated relatively favorable conditions compared with the other indicators examined. Furthermore, the results of the ANOVA analysis comparing neighborhoods in terms of compatibility with zero-carbon housing indicators confirmed the favorable condition of Neighborhood 1 and the unfavorable condition of Shahrek Neighborhood relative to the other twelve neighborhoods within the study area. These findings highlight significant spatial disparities in the implementation of zero-carbon housing principles across the neighborhoods of District 8 of Qom.           

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • zero-carbon housing
  • t-test
  • ANOVA
  • Pardisan
  • and Qom city
Amani, N., & Moghaddas Mashhad, M. (2020). Feasibility study of constructing zero-energy buildings in Iran’s cold and semi-arid climate: A case study of Mashhad city. Environmental Science and Technology, 22(5), 57–71. URL: https://sid.ir/paper/392122/fa (In Persian)
Ascione, F., Bianco, N., De Masi, R. F., Dousi, M., Hionidis, S., Kaliakos. S., Mastrapostoli, E., Nomikos, M., Santamouris, M., Synnefa, A.,Vanoli, G. P., & Vassilakopoulou, K. (2016), Design and performance analysis of a zero-energy settlement in Greece, Int Jnl of Low-Carbon Technologies, 12(2), 141–161.  Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.004
Asghari, A., Ebrahimi Asl, H., Maleki Gavgani, A., & Sattari Sarbanqali, H. (2021). Assessment of a sustainable urban neighborhood with zero-energy buildings: The case of Valiasr neighborhood, Tabriz. Journal of Sustainable City, 4(2), 91–106.  DOI: 20.1001.1.24766631.1400.4.2.5.9 (In Persian)
Attia S. (2018). Evolution of definitions and approaches, Net zero energy buildings (NZEB), Butterworth-Heinemann, 21–51. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812461-1.00002-2
Avazali Pour Haghighatparast, S., Taghizadeh, Y., & Zabihi, H. (2019). Designing a vernacular pattern in hot            and arid climates to reduce energy consumption in the residential sector: A case study of Yazd city. Environmental Science and Technology, 21(3), 227–236. https://sid.ir/paper/360859/fa (In Persian)
Brunetta, G., Caldarice, O., Tollin, N. & Casals Jordi Morató, M.R. (2019). Urban Resilience for Risk and Adaptation Governance Theory and Practice, Published of Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8
D’Agostino, D. & Parker, D. (2018). Data on cost-optimal Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) across Europe, Data in Brief, Vol.17, pp.1168–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.02.038
Diaz-Sarachaga, J.M., (2019) Analysis of the Global Resilience Assessment Frameworks for the Urban Realm, ICSD 5th International Conference on Sustainable Development, 17-21, Belgrade. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332511634_Analysis_of_the_Global_Resilience_Assessment_Frameworks_for_the_Urban_Realm
Esbensen T. V. & Korsgaard V. (1977). Dimensioning of the solar heating system in the zero energy house in Denmark. Sol Energy 1977, 19, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(77)90058-5
European Commission. (2024a). Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings (recast). Official Journal of the European Union.
European Commission. (2024b). Energy Performance of Buildings Directive: Towards Zero-Emission Standards. Official Journal of the EU.
Hoxha, V., Shala, A., & Dahiri, K. (2024). Transitioning to Net Zero Carbon Buildings: A Review of Current Challenges and Future Opportunities in Urban Environments. Journal of Sustainable Development, 17(1), 45-62.
IEA. (2021). Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. International Energy Agency.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach. IEA Publications.
Jan Zadeh, A., & Zandieh, M. (2016). Feasibility of designing a zero-energy neighborhood unit in Qazvin. Energy Policy and Planning Research, 2(3), 103–132. (In Persian) https://sid.ir/paper/266321/fa
Kheiri, R., Ghasemi Sichani, M., & Khodabakhshian, M. (2016). Designing a house based on zero-energy theory: A case study of Isfahan city. In Proceedings of the Biennial Conference on Society and Contemporary Architecture. (In Persian) https://sid.ir/paper/874220/fa
Laustsen J. (2008). Energy efficiency requirements in building codes, energy efficiency policies for new buildings, International Energy Agency (IEA),477–488.
Marszal, A. J.; Heiselberg, P.; Bourrelle, J. S.; Musall, E.; Voss, K; Sartori, I. and A. Napolitano (2011), “Zero Energy Building–A review of definitions and calculation methodologies”, Energy and Buildings, 979, 4-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.022
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2020). Embodied carbon mitigation and life cycle assessment in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 206, 109634.
Wang, J., & Zuo, K. (2025). Urban Housing and the Zero-Carbon Transition: Integrated Strategies for Sustainable Cities. Urban Planning and Architecture Review, 12(2), 112-128.
Wells, L. & Rismanchi, B. & Aye, L. (2018) A review of Net Zero Energy Buildings with reflections on the Australian context, Energy and Buildings, Vol.158, pp.616–628. DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.055
World Green Building Council. (2023). Advancing Net Zero: Whole Life Carbon Vision. London: WGBC.
Yang, X., & Jian, Y. (2019). Urban building energy modelling and sustainable neighborhood design. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 101558.
Zhang, J. & Zhou, N. & Hinge, A. Feng, W. & Zhang, S. (2016) Governance strategies to achieve zeroenergy buildings in China, Build Res Inf 2016, Vol.44: pp. 604–618. 10.1080/09613218.2016.1157345