بازنگری پراگماتیستی تعریف شهرسازی در ایران بر اساس نظریه داده بنیاد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته شهرسازی، دانشگاه گیلان، دانشکده معماری و هنر، رشت، ایران

2 دانشیارگروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و هنر، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

10.22124/upk.2025.29407.1999

چکیده

بیان مسئله: حدود شش دهه از فعالیت رسمی شهرسازی در ایران می‌گذرد، اما دستاوردهای توسعه شهری متناسب با مدت‌زمان این فعالیت نبوده است. یکی از علل ناکارآمدیِ نظام شهرسازی ایران فقدان تعریف مشخص در چارچوب یک پارادایم نظری صریح است که نتیجه آن ابهام در تعریف، نقش، جایگاه و عملکرد این رشته است.
هدف: پژوهش حاضر جستجوی تعریف شهرسازی را مبتنی بر فلسفه پراگماتیسم موردنظر قرار داده تا بتوان با ارائه مفهومی صریح از شهرسازی، زمینه‌ای واقع‌گرا برای عبور از ابهامات و دستیابی به توسعه شهری فراهم نمود.
روش: پژوهش از نوع کیفی است و در آن از راهبرد نظریه زمینه‌ای برای فهم الگوهای شهرسازی ایران از دیدگاه حرفه‌مندان به‌منظور ارائه تعریف عمل‌گرا و با هدف زمینه‌سازی برون‌رفت از کاستی‌ها استفاده‌شده است.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها از طریق تحلیل داده‌ها پس از کدگذاری 3 مرحله‌ای، به 5 مورد شرایط علی، زمینه‌ای، مداخله‌ای، راهبردها و پیامدها تفکیک و درنهایت مقوله اصلی: «نقص و ناکارآمدی رویکرد برنامه‌ریزی در مسیر توسعه شهری» به دست آمد.
نتیجه‌گیری: بر اساس نتایج، شهرسازی دانشی بین‌رشته‌ای و عمل‌محور است که با رویکردی انتقادی و مردم‌نگارانه به شناخت شهر و تعاملات و کنش‌های ساکنان پرداخته و در چارچوب حکمرانی دموکراتیک و مشارکتی، به توسعه‌ یکپارچه و پایدار شهر و پاسخگویی به مطالبات شهروندان می‌انجامد.
پراگماتیسم می‌تواند به‌عنوان یک پارادایم فلسفی- روش‌شناختی، مبنایی برای بازتعریف شهرسازی و مفاهیم آن در آینده ایران قرارگرفته و زمینه تحولات در نگرش، روش‌ها و الگوهای حاکم را در تناسب با زمینه و مطالبات شهروندان، با هدف دستیابی عمل‌گرایانه به توسعه یکپارچه و پایدار فراهم نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Pragmatic Reconsideration of the Definition of Urban Planning in Iran Based on Grounded Theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Nikpeyma 1
  • Hassan Ahmadi 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Guilan, Rasht ,Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: About six decades have passed since the official activity of urban planning in Iran, but the achievements of urban development have not been commensurate with the duration of this activity. One of the reasons for the inefficiency of the Iranian urban planning system is the lack of a specific definition within the framework of a clear theoretical paradigm, which results in ambiguity in the definition, role, status and performance of this field.
Goals: The present study aims to search for the definition of urban planning based on the philosophy of pragmatism in order to provide a realistic basis for overcoming ambiguities and achieving urban development by presenting a clear concept of urban planning.
Methodology: The research is of a qualitative type and uses the grounded theory strategy to understand Iranian urban planning patterns from the perspective of professionals in order to provide a pragmatic definition and with the aim of providing a basis for overcoming shortcomings.
Result: The findings were separated into 5 categories of causal, contextual, interventional, strategies, and consequences through data analysis after 3-stage coding, and finally the main category: "Defects and inefficiency of the planning approach in the path of urban development" was obtained.
Conclusion: Based on the results, urban planning is an interdisciplinary and action-oriented knowledge that deals with the city and the interactions and actions of residents with a critical and ethnographic approach, and within the framework of democratic and participatory governance, leads to integrated and sustainable development of the city and responsiveness to citizens' demands.
Pragmatism, as a philosophical-methodological paradigm, can serve as a basis for redefining urban planning and its concepts in the future of Iran and provide the basis for changes in the prevailing attitudes, methods, and patterns in proportion to the context and demands of citizens, with the goal of pragmatically achieving integrated and sustainable development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban Development
  • Critical Review
  • Pragmatism
  • Grounded Theory
  • Urban Planning in Iran

مراجع

Alexander, E. R. (2005). What Do Planners Need to Know? Identifying Needed Competencies, Methods and Skills. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22(2), 91–106.
Alexander, E. R. (2014). Planning or e-Planning? Implications for Theory, Education and Practice, International Journal of E-Planning Research, IGI Global, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2014010101
Alexander, E. R. (2016). There is no planning—only planning practices: Notes for spatial planning theories. Planning Theory, 15(1), 91-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215594617
Alexander, E. R. (2022). Advanced Introduction to Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 21(1), 101-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095221997085
Barati, N. (2006). Challenges have to be faced in the context of urbanism in Iran at the beginning of the 21th century. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 3(6), 5-29. (In Persian)
Barati, N., Mohaghegh Montazeri, M., & Nikpeyma, M. (2020). Rethinking the Conceptual Challenge between Plan and Design in the Discourse of Iran's Urban Development: From Education to Practice. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(4), 15-32. (In Persian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.14423.1289
Batty, S. E. (2006). Planning for Sustainable Development in Britain: A Pragmatic Approach. The Town Planning Review, 77(1), 29–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.77.1.3
Beauregard, R. A. (2020). Advanced introduction to planning theory (M. Rafieian & M. Ghazaie, Trans.). Tehran: Agah. (In Persian)
Beauregard, R. A. (2021). Hybrid pragmatisms. Urban Geography, 42(10), 1394–1396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1940710
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The social construction of reality. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 110-122). Routledge.
Bond, S. (2011). Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’ moving beyond the agonistic–communicative divide. Planning Theory, 10(2), 161-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210383081
Bridge, Gary. (2014). On Marxism, Pragmatism and Critical Urban Studies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1644-1659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12057
Chike, A. B. (2020). An Evaluation of William James’ Pragmatic Concept of Truth. African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 4(4), 11-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52589/AJSSHR-RA80JGIL
Creswell, J. W. (2005), Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.
Dadashpour, H., & Yazdanian, A. (2019). How to Read the Space? From Phenomenological To the Critical Reading of Space. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(2), 1-14. (In Persian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2019.14084.1266
Davoudi, S. (2015). Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14(3), 316-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215575919
De Leo, D., & Forester, J. (2017). Reimagining planning: moving from reflective practice to deliberative practice-a first exploration in the Italian context. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(2), 202-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1284254
Dorstewitz, Philipp. (2008). Reconstructing Rationality: Agency and inquiry in John Dewey’s project as a foundation for social and urban planning. PhD Thesis submitted to the Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method at the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Eagleton, T. (2024). Culture (A. Salehi, Trans.). Tehran: Lahita. (In Persian)
Forester, J. (1987). Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(3), 303-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368708976450
Forester, J. (1999). Reflections on the future understanding of planning practice. International Planning Studies, 4(2), 175–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563479908721734
Forester, J. (2012). From Good Intentions to A Critical Pragmatism. In Randall Crane, and Rachel Weber (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning, Oxford Handbooks.
Forester, J. (2013). On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning Theory, 12(1), 5-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212448750
Forester, John. (2017). On the Evolution of a Critical Pragmatism. In “Encounters in Planning Thought” book. Published by Routledge.
Friedmann, J. (2015). Insurgencies: Essays in planning theory (M. Rafieian & M. Nazari, Trans.). Tehran: Arman-Shahr. (In Persian)
Furlong, K., Carré, M.-N., & Guerrero, T. A. (2017). Urban service provision: Insights from pragmatism and ethics. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(12), 2800-2812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17734547
Glaser, B. G & A. Strauss. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago: Aldine.
Gustafson, J. M. (2020). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (F. Majidi, Trans.). Tehran: Elmi-Farhangi. (In Persian)
Hall, D. (2014). Planning and pragmatism: an introductory outline particularly involving the elimination of goal-achievement in the planning process. Lincoln Planning Review, 6(1-2), 25-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34900/lpr.v6i1-2.833
Harrison, P. (2002). A pragmatic attitude to planning. Planning futures: New directions for planning theory, 157-171.
Healey, P. (2009). The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 277-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08325175
Heisenberg, W. (2011). Physics and beyond (H. Masoumi-Hamedani, Trans.). Tehran: Iran University Press. (In Persian)
Hoch, C. (1996). What do Planners do in the United States? In Explorations in Planning Theory, edited by Seymour J. Mandelbaum, Luigi Mazza, and Robert W.Burchell, 225-240. New Brunwich, NJ: CUPR Press.
Hoch, C. (1996-b). 'A Pragmatic Inquiry about Planning and Power', in Seymour J. Mandelbaum, Luigi Mazza and Robert W. Burchell (eds), Explorations in Planning Theory, New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, pp. 30-44.
Hoch, C. (2016). Utopia, scenario and plan: A pragmatic integration. Planning Theory, 15(1), 6-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213518641
Hoch, C. J. (1984-a). Pragmatism, Planning, and Power. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 4(2), 86-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X8400400203
Hoch, C. J. (1984-b). Doing Good and Being Right the Pragmatic Connection in Planning Theory, Journal of the American Planning Association, 50:3, 335-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368408976600
Hoch, C. J. (2007). Pragmatic Communicative Action Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(3), 272-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X06295029
Hoch, C. J. (2017). Pragmatism and Plan-Making. In “Encounters in Planning Thought” book. Published by Routledge.
Holden, M., & Scerri, A. (2015). Justification, compromise and test: Developing a pragmatic sociology of critique to understand the outcomes of urban redevelopment. Planning Theory, 14(4), 360-383.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214530701
Innes, J. E. (2004). Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning theory, 3(1), 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095204042315
Jon, I. (2020). Pragmatism and contemporary planning theory: Going beyond a communicative approach. In J. Wills & R. W. Lake (Eds.), The power of pragmatism: Knowledge production and social inquiry (1st ed., pp. 228–243). Manchester University Press.
Kato, S., & Ahern, J. (2008). ‘Learning by doing’: adaptive planning as a strategy to address uncertainty in planning. Journal of environmental planning and management, 51(4), 543-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560802117028
Katouzian, H. (2023). Iranian history and politics: The dialectic of state and society (A. Tayeb, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. (In Persian)
Lieto, L. (2024). Normative ecologies of planning: Understanding norms in action. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(2), 864-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X211021150
Lord, A. (2014). Towards a non-theoretical understanding of planning. Planning Theory, 13(1), 26-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213477642
Maani, D. (1969). A Look at the Causes of the Growing Importance of Public Planning in Recent Centuries. Human Environment Journal, 1, 43-49. (In Persian)
MalekpourAsl, B., & Mousavi Khorshidi, R. (2022). The Transformation of Planning Theories: "Paradigm Shift" or "Evolution of Theories"? or Evolution of Theories? A Brief Critique of the Situation of Planning Theories in Iran. Soffeh, 32(1), 85-114. (In Persian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.52547/SOFEH.32.1.85
McGreevy, M. P. (2018). Complexity as the telos of postmodern planning and design: Designing better cities from the bottom-up. Planning Theory, 17(3), 355-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095217711473
Meck, Stuart. (1991). The Two Cultures of Planning: Toward the New Pragmatism. Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 43:7, 3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.1991.10395761
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of economic development, environment and people, 7(1), 23-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571
Mohammadpour, A. (2013). Qualitative Research Method- Counter Method 1: The Logic and Design in Qualitative Methodology. Tehran: Jameshenasan. (In Persian)
Olesen, Kristian. (2018). Teaching planning theory as planner roles in urban planning education, Higher Education Pedagogies, 3:1, 302-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1425098
Pansardi, P., & Bindi, M. (2021). The new concepts of power? Power-over, power-to and power-with. In Essays on Evolutions in the Study of Political Power (pp. 51-71). Routledge.
Piran, P. (2009). Characteristics of the Collective Personality of Iranians or Mechanisms of Survival (Self-Critique). Ayin Journal, 26-27, 15-19. (In Persian)
Rafieian, M., Ghasemi, I., & Nouzari, K. (2019). A New Formulation of the Concept of the Spatial Justice Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Tehrān City. Urban planning knowledge, 3(3), 21-44. (In Persian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2019.14284.1281
Roshani, S., & Sarrafi, M. (2021). The Evolution of Urban Planning and Its Connections with the Formulation of the Question of Iran in the New Knowledge System. Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(3), 91-106. (In Persian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2021.19745.1647
Rostami, P. (2017). Critique of Wittgenstein’s family resemblance criticisms to the Aristotelian definitions. Logical Studies, 8(2), 69-96. (In Persian)
Rydin, Yvonne. (2025). Planning without Growth. Policy Press.
Schön, D. A. (1982). Some of what a planner knows a case study of knowing-in-practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(3), 351-364.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976184
Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.
Schoneboom, A., Slade, J., Tait, M., & Vigar, G. (2022). What Town Planners Do: Exploring Planning Practices and the Public Interest Through Workplace Ethnographies. Policy Press.
Shokri Yazdanabad, S., & Rafieian, M. (2024). The Role of Interactive Planning in Today's Urban Planning Field as Perceived By Professionals. Naqshejahan, 14(3), 81-104. (In Persian)
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2021). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (E. Afshar, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. (In Persian)
Talisse, R. B., & Aikin, S. F. (2008). Pragmatism: A guide for the perplexed (H. Golshahi, Trans.). Tehran: Elmi-Farhangi. (In Persian)
Verma, N. (1996). Pragmatic Rationality and Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(1), 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9601600102
Vickers, G. (Ed.). (1968). Value Systems and Social Process (1st ed.). Routledge.
Vidyarthi, S. (2020). Charles Hoch: A pesky pragmatist. Planning Theory, 19(4), 445-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219881858
Watson, V. (2002). Do We Learn from Planning Practice? The Contribution of the Practice Movement to Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(2), 178-187.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X02238446
Zali, N. (2013). Deconstruction of the Planning Process in the 21st Century. European Spatial Research and Policy, 20(2), 87-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/esrp-2013-0012
 
دانش شهرسازی
دوره 8، شماره 4
1403
صفحه 21-42

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 16 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 23 مهر 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار