نقش برنامه‌ریزی در به حاشیه رانده شدن تهی‌دستان شهری (خوانش انتقادی بازتولید حاشیه در شهرهای ایران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

2 استادگروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

چکیده

بیان مسئله: برنامه‌ریزی شهری در ایران معمولاً در قامت کنشی فنی و بی‌طرف معرفی می‌شود، در حالی‌ که در بستر پیوند ساختاری میان قدرت، انباشت سرمایه و کنترل اجتماعی عمل می‌کند. این فرایند، نه‌تنها فضا را سامان می‌دهد، بلکه به‌طور فعال در تولید و بازتولید نابرابری فضایی و به‌حاشیه‌رانده شدن تهیدستان شهری نقش دارد. پرسش اصلی این پژوهش آن است که برنامه‌ریزی چگونه در دل منطق‌های اقتصاد سیاسی و سازوکارهای حکمرانی، به ابزاری برای طرد فضایی بدل می‌شود.
هدف: واکاوی انتقادی نقش برنامه‌ریزی در بازتولید حاشیه در شهرهای ایران و تحلیل چگونگی هم‌نشینی قدرت، سرمایه و دانش در شکل‌دهی به قلمروهای رسمی و غیررسمی است.
روش: پژوهش از پارادایم انتقادی و رویکرد کیفی بهره می‌گیرد و با اتکا بر چارچوب نظری اقتصاد سیاسی فضا، حکومت‌مندی و مطالعات جنوب جهانی، اسناد برنامه‌ریزی، سیاست‌گذاری‌های شهری و نهادهای اجرایی پس از انقلاب را با خوانشی انتقادی بررسی می‌کند
یافته‌ها: نظام برنامه‌ریزی ایران از مدرنیزاسیون تکنوکراتیک به حکمرانی با منطق‌های نئولیبرالی و رانتی چرخش کرده است. سازوکارهایی مانند تغییرات گزینشی کاربری زمین، انعطاف‌پذیری مقرراتی و بازآفرینی‌های شهری سودمحور، رانت‌جویی ساختاری را تقویت کرده و طرد فضایی را نهادینه ساخته‌اند. تحلیل پژوهش سه سطح از به‌حاشیه‌رانده‌شدن تهیدستان را آشکار می‌کند: سطح کلانِ پیوند دولت–بازار و سرمایه‌داری رانتی؛ سطح میانیِ برنامه‌ریزی تقلیل‌گرا و شی‌ءانگار؛ و سطح خردِ کنش‌های بقا، سازش و مقاومت تهیدستان شهری.
نتیجه­ گیری: مطالعه بیان می‌کند که برنامه‌ریزی در ایران، همانند بسیاری از شهرهای جنوب جهانی، بیش از آنکه ابزاری برای تحقق عدالت فضایی باشد، سازوکار مدیریت نابرابری و تثبیت مرزهای حاشیه است. با این حال، کنش‌های روزمره فرودستان ظرفیت برساختن اشکال خُردی از سیاست شهری و مقاومت فضایی را در دل نظم‌های طردکننده نشان می‌دهد؛ ظرفیتی که بازاندیشی در الگوهای برنامه‌ریزی و امکان حرکت به‌سوی سیاست‌گذاری مبتنی بر عدالت فضایی را ضروری می‌سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Urban Planning in the marginalizing the Urban Poor (A Critical Reading of the Reproduction of margin in Iranian Cities)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Milad Doostvandi 1
  • Kayoumars Irandoost 2
1 PhD Candidate, Department of urban planning and design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Professor, Department of urban planning and design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The rapid growth of informal settlements and the systematic exclusion of low-income urban populations have become chronic urban issues in Iran. These issues cannot be attributed solely to demographic pressures, housing shortages, or individual choices. Rather, they reflect the complex interplay of a rentier political economy, speculative land markets, neoliberal reforms, and the chronic inefficiencies of the urban planning system. Although global scholarship emphasizes that urban marginality is shaped by power relations and capitalist modes of spatial production, dominant policy discourses in Iran continue to frame informal settlements as purely technical or physical problems. This conceptual misalignment contributes to a continuous cycle in which cities function as arenas for capital accumulation, enabling groups with political and economic power to reshape urban space while displacing or excluding low-income populations. This structural process deepens spatial injustice, exacerbates socio-spatial fragmentation, and entrenches urban poverty. This study aims to critically investigate the multiscale mechanisms through which low-income groups are marginalized in Iranian cities. The analysis focuses on three interrelated levels: the macro level (political economy, state capitalism, and rent-driven accumulation), the meso level (urban planning institutions, land-use regulations, and planning discourses), and the micro level (resistance and adaptive strategies of marginalized residents).
Methodology: Adopting a critical urban studies approach rooted in the political economy of space, this study employs critical analysis, documentary review, policy analysis, and comparative assessment. Data were collected from national reports, statutory plans, urban policy documents, academic studies, and global case literature. 
Results: The study revealed several key findings.1. Macro-level political economy: Iran’s rentier and state-dominated economy, characterized by speculative land markets, the financialization of housing, inflationary cycles, and oil-dependent revenue structures, has transformed housing into a vehicle for capital accumulation rather than a social right. This structural setting pushes low-income households out of formal housing markets and toward peripheral urban areas. .2. Meso-level planning and land governance: Iran’s urban planning system, influenced by technocratic, top-down, and blueprint-based models, has inadvertently exacerbated socio-spatial exclusion. Rigid land-use regulations, costly construction standards, restrictive urban-growth boundaries, and inflexible comprehensive plans increase housing costs, limit mixed-income development, and contribute to urban sprawl and peripheralization. 3. Micro-level strategies and resistance: Residents of informal settlements employ adaptive strategies, such as incremental housing, land appropriation, informal service provision, and community-based networks, to resist displacement and secure their right to the city. These practices demonstrate social innovation yet remain largely unrecognized by formal planning systems.The findings underscore that the drivers of urban marginalization in Iran are structural rather than incidental. Policies focused on physical upgrading, redevelopment, or formalization have proven ineffective because they fail to address the underlying political and economic dynamics of spatial production. The state’s dual role as regulator, owner, developer, and beneficiary of land rents creates conflicts of interest that undermine equity-oriented planning. Furthermore, Iran’s planning system, which is based on imported modernist paradigms, has systematically disregarded the everyday practices, informal economies, and social infrastructures that shape urban life. Compared with other countries, Iran’s process of marginalization is less overtly violent but more structurally persistent; displacement occurs gradually and is often mediated by economic pressures and regulatory exclusion rather than direct eviction. This produces a form of “slow marginalization” that continuously reproduces inequality.
Conclusion: The study concludes that the marginalization of low-income urban residents in Iran is a systemic outcome of the political economy of space rather than a byproduct of informal settlements or individual behavior. Spatial injustice will persist as long as land and housing remain instruments of capital accumulation and planning institutions continue to operate within technocratic and centralized frameworks. Meaningful change requires:
- Redefining the role of the state from a rent-seeking actor to a steward of the public interest;
- Reforming land and housing policies to promote affordability and social equity;
- Integrating incremental and community-driven development into formal planning processes;
- Strengthening local governance and participatory institutions.
Recognizing the “right to the city” as a foundational urban principle is also essential. Without addressing these structural issues, redevelopment projects and physical-upgrading strategies will be unable to curb the expansion of informal settlements or significantly improve the lives of marginalized urban populations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban planning
  • critical thought
  • capital accumulation
  • power
  • informality
  • marginalization

مراجع

Aalbers, M. (2016). The financialization of housing: a political economy approach. Routledge.
Abbasi Taghi Dizej, R. and Pashazadeh, A. (2021). Identifying the Factors Affecting Regional Inequality in Iran. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 11(41), 25-50. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2021.6573
Abdilahi, M. & Rad, F. (2009). Study of Transformation and Structural Impediments of Political Development in Iran. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 10(1), 29-63. (In Persian) Dor:  https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17351901.1388.10.1.2.4
Alalhesabi, M., daneshpour, S. A. and Basiri Mojdehi, R. (2023). Formulation of Place Criticism in Terms of Political Economy; Scrutinizing the "Urban-Relational". Urban Planning Knowledge, 7(1), 1-27. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2022.19448.1640
Amoo, E., & hataminejad, H. (2019). The Pathology of Iranian Land Use Planning. Regional Planning, 9(34), 27-38. (In Persian) Dor: https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22516735.1398.9.34.3.8
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J., Cole, H. Garcia-Lamarca, M. Triguero-Mas, M. Baró, F. ... & Minaya, J. M. (2022). Green gentrification in European and North American cities. Nature communications, 13(1), 3816. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1
Ansari, S., & Partovi, P. (2019). The Roots and Principles of Post-structuralism in Urban Planning. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism(JIAU), 9(2), 195-216. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30475/isau.2019.87942
Azuela, A., & de Antunano, E. (2025). Four Regimes of Informality: Legal Practices and Revolutionary Politics in Twentieth-Century Mexico City. In Informal Cities: Histories of Governance and Inequality in Latin Europe, Latin America, and Colonial North Africa (pp. 27-52). University of Chicago Press.
Azunre, G. A. (2024). An overlooked phenomenon? Reflecting on elite housing informality and its potential sustainability implications. Journal of Planning Literature, 39(3), 365-370. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231225195
Bayat, A. (2021). Revolutionary life: The everyday of the Arab Spring. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Borhani,K., Rafieian,M. and Meshkini,A. (2017). Land Use Change and Political Economy of Space: Developing a Theoretical- Integrated Model. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 18(3), 86-109. (In Persian) Dor: https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17351901.1396.18.3.4.6
Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
Brenner, N. (2009). What is critical urban theory? , City, 13(2–3), 198–207. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902996466
Caldeira, T. P. (2017). Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 3-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658479
Chen, M., & Carré, F. (2020). The informal economy revisited: Examining the past, envisioning the future. Taylor & Francis.
Christophers, B. (2022). Rentier capitalism: Who owns the economy, and who pays for it? London: Verso.
Dadashpoor, H., & Parsaeian, A. (2025). Reproduction of inequality in policies related to informal settlements. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 30(2), 21-35. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2025.397936.673095
Daneshpour, S. A., Kheyroddin, R., Sarrafi, M., & Ashnaiy, T. (2022). The Necessity of the Radical Rethinking of Urban Informality A Critical and Analytical Review of Iran's Urban Planning and Policy Documents. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 15(37), 5-26. (In Persian) Doi: https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2022.3648.1781
Daneshvar, M. (2021). Revealing the Components of the Process of Preparation and Approval of Urban Development Plans Using Multi-Level Situation Analysis Case Study: Mashhad Urban Development Plans. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 14(32), 91-110. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30480/aup.2021.3376.1719
Darkesh, M., & Esterki, S. (2020). Pathology of urban plans from the perspective of the right to the city (Case Study: Navab Urban Plan - Metro Expansion in Bryank Neighborhood). Sociology of Culture and Art, 2(3), 25-1. (In Persian) Doi:  https://doi.org/10.34785/J016.2021.445
Datta, A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in human geography, 5(1), 3-22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565748
Dayarian, N., & Nourian, F. (2022). Legalization: A Look at the Legitimation of Violations in the Construction Phase (Case Study: Megamalls in the City of Tehran, Iran). Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 27(3), 35-44. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2023.345103.672779
De Soto, H. (2007). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. Basic books.
Doucet, B. (2014). A process of change and a changing process: Introduction to the special issue on contemporary gentrification. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 105(2), 125-139. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12075
Ebrahim parvar, M., Majedi, H., & Zarabadi, Z. S. S. (2024). Explanation of the Physical -Spatial Justice Components of a Justice-Oriented City with an Emphasis on the Knowledge - Power Theory, Case Study: the Five Districts of Rasht City. Urban Planning Knowledge, 8(1), 62-86. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2024.25410.1883
Elden, S. (2004). Between Marx and Heidegger: politics, philosophy and Lefebvre's The production of space. Antipode, 36(1), 86-105.  Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00383.x
Eskandari Dorbati, Z., Javaheripour, M., & Torkaman, F. (2023). The phenomenon of space in informal settlements: the lived experience of Imam Hassan mojtaba Bazaar in Nasimshahr (Akbarabad) (1986- 2016). Motaleate Shahri, 12(45), 97-108. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.34785/J011.2022.006
Esmaeeldokht, M., Mansouri, S. & Sheibani, M. (2021). A Comparative Study of Citizens’ Interpretations of the City (Urban Landscape) and Urban Development Plans A Transition from a Traditional landscape to a Modern one in Shiraz. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 18(96), 45-58. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.238222.4597
Esmaeili, M., Nourian, F., & Sheydayi, A. (2024). Reading Conceptual Discourses of Power in Urban Studies and Urban Planning Research. Urban Strategic Thought, 2(1), 1-20. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30479/ust.2024.19890.1138
Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Fallahi, M., Rezapour Ahangar, A., & Alikaei, S. (2023). Conceptualizing of power in urban planning theories. International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability, 5(1), 54-75. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/ijumes.2024.2015773.1176
Farahani, R., Salehi, S., & Parsamehr, M. (2025). The Urban Poverty Discourse in Iran: Discourse Analysis of the Evolution of Government Policies and Ideological Representations Between the Third to the Thirteenth Governments. Quarterly Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 10(34), 83-122. (In Persian) Doi:  https://Doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2025.83910.1688
Fields, D. (2018). Constructing a new asset class: Property-led financial accumulation after the crisis. Economic Geography, 94(2), 118–140. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1397492
Flynn, S. (2022). Equality in the city: Imaginaries of the smart future. intellect.
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Phronetic planning research: Theoretical & methodological reflections. Planning theory & practice, 5(3), 283-306. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000250195
Fontes, L. (2025). Authoritarian neoliberalism, urban peripheries and the rise of the extreme right in Brazil. Urban Studies, 62(15), 2976-2992. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251345749
Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ganjeali, F., & Ghalandarian, I. (2025). Representation of Barriers to the Implementation of Urban Development Plans in Iran: A Systematic Review of Studies (2014–2024). Urban Economics and Planning, 6(2), 242-263. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22034/uep.2025.519229.1633
Ghertner, D. A. (2015). Rule by aesthetics: World-class city making in Delhi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilpin, R. (2000). The challenge of global capitalism: The world economy in the 21st century. Princeton university press.
Goonewardena, K. Kipfer, S. Milgrom, R. & Schmid, C. (2008). Space, difference, everyday life: Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.
Habibi, M. (2001). Dela cite a la ville, Tehran University Press. (In Persian)
Habibi, M. and Tavangar, M. R. (2022). Power and Public Interest: A Critical Analysis of Formulating Public Interest in Urban Development Plans Case Study: Qiam Street, Yazd. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 14(34), 71-92. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30480/aup.2021.3175.1661
Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. New York: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
Healey, P. (2020). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hodjati, H., & Ghorbani, R. (2023). Comparative-Critical review of the basis and process of preparing Comprehensive Plan; Strategic Plan and Structural-Strategic Plan. Urban Planning Knowledge, 7(2), 65-90. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2023.22497.1778
Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press.
Huq, E., & Miraftab, F. (2020). “We are all refugees”: Camps and informal settlements as converging spaces of global displacements. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(3), 351-370. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1776376
Imani Shamloo, j., & Rafieian. M. (2016). Power and Re-definition of Urban Planning Theory (with an Emphasis on Political Economy in Oil-Based Economies, Strategy, 25(3), e124606 .(In Persian) Dor: https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.10283102.1395.25.3.10.4
Imani Shamlou, J., Rafeian, M. & Dadashpour, H. (2016). Urban Speculation and Spatial Segregation (Analysis of Spatial Evolution of Tehran Metropolis in the Context of Oil-Based Economy). Geopolitics Quarterly, 12(41), 104-135. (In Persian)Dor:  https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17354331.1395.12.41.5.1
Immergluck, D. (2022). Red hot city: Housing, race, and exclusion in twenty-first-century Atlanta. University of California Press.
Irandoost, K. (2009). Informal settlements and the myth of marginalization. Tehran: Urban Planning and Processing Company. (In Persian).
Kamete, A. Y. (2017). Governing enclaves of informality: Unscrambling the logic of the camp in urban Zimbabwe. Geoforum, 81, 76-86. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.012
Kanooni, R., Hataminejad, H., Pourahmad, A., & zanganeh Shahraki, S. (2023). The implications of Bruno Latour's actant-network theory in urban planning with an emphasis on informal settlements. Urban Planning Knowledge, 7(1), 28-51. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2023.22901.1802
Kheyroddin, R. (2010). A geo-referenciel analysis on urban governance policies in Tehran metropolis (The years 1993-2007) Toward urban integration or spatial segregation?. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 2(42), 71-82. (In Persian)  https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1389.2.42.7.6
Lees, L. (2016). Gentrification, race, and ethnicity: Towards a global research agenda? City & Community, 15(3), 208-214.  Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1111/cico.12185
Lees, L. Shin, H. B. & López-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell
Lefebvre, H. (1996), Writings on Cities, translate by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas, Blackwell.
MalekAfzali, A. A., & ghasemsharifi, T. (2019). Rethinking planning theory and practice: a glimmer of light for prospects of integrated planning to combat complex urban realities. Geography and Human Relationships, 2(3), 292-308. (In Persian) Dor: https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1398.2.3.17.9
Malekpourasl, B., & Joudi-Gollor, P. (2015). Re-exploring of People in Collaborative Planning through the Mediation of the Beginning of Politics Concept. Political and International Approaches, 6(3), 117-142.
Marcuse, P., & Madden, D. (2024). In defense of housing: The politics of crisis. Verso Books.
Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2-3), 185-197. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177
Marcuse, P. (2011). The three historic currents of city planning. The new Blackwell companion to the city, edited by Gary Bridge and Sophie Watson. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 643–55.
Mashhadi Moghadam, S. N., & Rafieian, M. (2019). If  Foucault were an urban planner: An epistemology of power in planning theories. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6(1), 1592065. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1592065
McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: Politics, crisis, and the city. Planning theory & practice, 13(1), 89-108. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.649951
Miraftab, F., & Huq, E. (2024). Urbanizing social reproduction:(Re) thinking the politics of care in capitalist urban development. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 42(2), 234-253. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758241230179
Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the Global South. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32–50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099297
Mitchell, D. (1995). The end of public space? People’s Park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(1), 108–133. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01797.x
Mohammadi Tabaei, M., Malekafzali, A. A., & Boochani, M. H. (2023). Analysis of the Conflict of Stakeholders’ Power and Interest in the Brown Fields Redevelopment Planning (Poshte Garajha’s Brown Fields Redevelopment). Urban Economics and Planning, 4(1), 144-157. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22034/uep.2023.385230.1328
Muir, J. (2004). Public participation in area‐based urban regeneration programmes. Housing Studies, 19(6), 947-966.  Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267303042000293026
Myers, G. (2011). African cities: Alternative visions of urban theory and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Nadeem, G. F., Seyedalhosseini, S. M., Hanaee, T. & Sarvari, H. (2023). Identifying the informal settlements’ physical development principles as a context-based pattern using the Meta-synthesis method. Urban Planning Knowledge, 7(2), 91-110. (In Persian) Doi:  https://Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2023.22806.1801
Nazari, N., & Farhadi, M. (2022). The Role of Government in Urban Marginalizing (the case of Kermanshah). Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 16(2), 72-96. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22034/jss.2023.542187.1619
Nejati, N., Sarrafi, M. & Najafzadeh, R. (2021). Explanation of the Role of Power-knowledge in the Spatial Planning with Emphasis on Disciplinary Power and Bio-Power. Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(2), 133-151. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2021.18399.1597
Nejati, N., Sarrafi, M., & Najafzadeh, R. (2021). Insurgency planning in gray spaces (Case Study: Abkooh Neighborhood in Mashhad). Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 26(2), 67-79. (In Persian) Doi:  https://Doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2022.332766.672708
Nezhadbahram, Z., & Jalili, S. M. (2021). Explanation of “Urban Power” and Its Effects on the Development Process of Tehran City. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 13(33), 269-280. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2020.208096.2037
Nikbin, A., Kkazemian, G., & Sharifzadegan, M. H. (2023). Investigating the Four Dimensions of Power in Mega Mall Development Case Study: District 1 of Tehran Metropolis. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 16(41), 5-21. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30480/aup.2022.4471.1976
Nkula-Wenz, L., Cirolia, L. & Berrisford, S. (2023). Corruption in urban planning, a guide for professional and trainee planners. Transparency International
Nobahar, E., & Ghorbani, F. (2021). Spatial Causality between Migration, Income Inequality and Poverty in Iranian Cities. Economic Growth and Development Research, 11(43), 102-83. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30473/egdr.2020.49894.5529
Nouripour sedehi, M., & Ahmadi, H. (2025). Providing outflow soloutions of the harms caused by the transformation of urban retails in the city; Case study: District 2 of Rasht. Quarterly Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 10(32), 91-138. (In Persian) Doi: https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2024.78004.1614
Oosterlynck, S., Beeckmans, L., Bassens, D., Derudder, B., Segaert, B., & Braeckmans, L. (Eds.). (2019). The city as a global political actor. London: Routledge.
Oskouee Aras, A., & Azar, A. (2023). A Meta-Analysis of Researches Conducted on the Quality of Urban Life in Informal Settlements in Iran. Urban Planning Knowledge, 7(3), 67-89. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2023.22756.1796
Perlman, J. (2010). Favela: Four decades of living on the edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford University Press.
Pottinger-Glass, C., & Pfeffer, K. (2020). A city for whom? Marginalization and the production of space in contemporary Bangalore, India. In Handbook of quality of life and sustainability (pp. 295-315). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Purcell, M. (2006). Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban studies, 43(11), 1921-1941. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1080=00420980600897826
Purcell, M. (2013). The right to the city: the struggle for democracy in the urban public realm. Policy & Politics, 41(3), 311-327. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655639
Rafieian, M., Taghvaee, A. A., & shahmohamadeian, H. (2018). Analysis of relation of power in the planning process of urban development projects. Case study: 17 shahrivar Street Tehran. Geography and Development, 16(52), 97-116. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2018.4133
Rafieian, M., & Kianfar, A. (2019). Understanding ‘Gray spaces’: The position of power in the process of relations of the informal settlements (study: Razavie District). Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 24(1), 5-16. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2019.271919.672185
Rezaei, M., Afaghpoor, A., & MalekpourAsl,, B. (2025). An analysis of urban development plan regulations influencing housing construction trends in different district of Tehran. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 18(49), 121-151. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30480/aup.2025.5705.2224
Rolnik, R. (2013). Late neoliberalism: The financialization of homeownership and housing rights. International journal of urban and regional research, 37(3), 1058-1066. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12062
Rolnik, R. (2019). Urban Warfare. Housing under the Empire of Finance. Londres: Verso.
Roshani, S., & Sarrafi, M. (2021). The Evolution of Urban Planning and Its Connections with the Formulation of the Question of Iran in the New Knowledge System. Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(3), 91-106. (In Persian) Doi:  https://Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2021.19745.1647
Roy, A., & AlSayyad, N. (Eds.). (2004). Urban Informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lexington Books.
Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689
Roy, A. (2009). The 21st-century metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43(6), 819–830. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701809665
Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning theory, 8(1), 76-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099299
Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x
Roy, A. (2012). Urban Informality: The Production of Space and Practice of Planning', in Randall Crane, and Rachel Weber (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning, Oxford Handbooks.
Salaripour, A., & Talebi Somesaraei, M. (2025). Developing a Conceptual-operational model of Critical Urbanism Pedagogy: A Case study of the creative city of Rasht, Iran. Motaleate Shahri, 14(55), 19-34. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22034/urbs.2025.142096.5080
Sarrafi, M. (2025). The problematization of informality in Iran; Structural violence in the production of an anti-life space for the underprivileged. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 17(46), 4-23. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30480/aup.2025.5597.2203
Sarrafi, M., Tavakolinia, J. & Chamani-Moghadm, M. (2014). Planners’ Position in the Iranian Urban Planning Process. Motaleate Shahri, 3(12), 19-32.
Sarvar, R., Darvish, B. & Khaliji, M. A. (2021). Political economy and integrated greenbelt management of Tehran metropolitan area. Urban Economics, 6(1), 27-40. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22108/ue.2022.134331.1220
Shams pouya, M. K., Tavakolinia, J., Sarrafi, M., & Fanni, Z. (2018). An analysis on the development plans and urban land policies in Tehran metropolis with emphasis on good land governance approach. Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 26(104), 57-76. (In Persian) Doi:  https://Doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2018.30518
Sharifzadegan, M., & Rostami, M. (2024). Meta-Analysis: The Relationship between Housing Planning and Urban Development Plans in Iran. Quarterly Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 9(31), 107-144. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2024.79715.1637
Shatkin, G. (2016). The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia. Cities, 53, 141-149.  Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.015
Shin, H. B., Lees, L., & López-Morales, E. (2016). Introduction: Locating gentrification in the global east. Urban Studies, 53(3), 455-470. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1177/0042098015620337
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations: Volume One. London.
Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.
Soja, E. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
Song, L. K. (2016). Planning with urban informality: a case for inclusion, co-production and reiteration. International Development Planning Review, 38(4), 359-381. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2016.21
Sowgat, T., Wang, Y. P., & McWilliams, C. (2017). Pro-poorness of planning policies in Bangladesh: the case of Khulna city. International Planning Studies, 22(2), 145-160. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2016.1220287
Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International journal of urban and regional research, 33(3), 601-620. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
Taherian, N., & Parsi, H. (2023). The Dynamism of the Political Economy of Space, Physical Imbalance and Visual Disturbance (Case Study: Shahrdari Street from Tajrish Square to Quds Square). MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape, 15(63), 52-69. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2023.364363.2206
Tavakolinia, J., & Zarghami, S. (2018). Pathology of Fifth and Sixth National Plans regarding to housing supply for urban low income groups. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 5(16), 47-82. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22080/shahr.2018.2012
The Parliament Research Center (2019), Report on the Causes of Persistent Poverty in Iran and Suggestions for Escaping Poverty. (In Persian)
The Parliament Research Center (2020), Requirements for Realizing the Second Step of the Revolution (Housing and Urban Development Section). (In Persian)
The Parliament Research Center (2022), Report on Marginal Settlement (Informal Settlement) in Iran; Approaches, Policies and Measures. (In Persian)
Vafaei, E., & Geraeinejad, G. (2022). Finding the Root of the Pathos in the Planning System of Iran: 5-why Technique. Program and Development Research, 3(2), 179-203. (In Persian) Doi:  https://Doi.org/10.22034/pbr.2022.348655.1243
Vaziri Zadeh, A., & Haghshenas Gorgani, N. (2023). Questioning the Housing Gap in Iran Understanding the Housing Gap for Low-Income Households in Iran (based on the political economy approach). Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 16(41), 45-71. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.30480/aup.2023.4266.1928
Vosoughi, S., & Nourian, F. (2025). The role of power in the reproduction of elite informality in the urban planning system: ‎A discourse analysis of vested rights in the revision of the Samen district plan, ‎Mashhad. Motaleate Shahri, 14(55), 35-50. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22034/urbs.2025.141880.5073
Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11), 2259–2275.  Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598
Yiftachel, O. (1998). Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of planning literature, 12(4), 395-406. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229801200401
Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on ‘gray cities’: The coming of urban apartheid? Planning Theory, 8(1), 88–100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099300
Zandieh, S., & Sarrafi, M. (2022). Toward a Framework for Conceptualizing Public Interest in Spatial Planning. Quarterly Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 7(22), 1-43. (In Persian) Doi: https://Doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2022.69943.1475
دانش شهرسازی
دوره 10، شماره 2
تیر 1405
صفحه 42-74

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 10 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 08 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 15 خرداد 1405

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار